Council of Europe – AI as a risk to enhance discrimination – Pre 06 2019: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
== People ==  
== People ==  
Prof. Borgesius, Prof. Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, Professor of Law, Radboud University, NL (moderator)
Prof. Borgesius, Prof. Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, Professor of Law, Radboud University, NL (moderator)
Kirsi Pimiä, Anti-Discrimination Ombudsman, Finland
Kirsi Pimiä, Anti-Discrimination Ombudsman, Finland
Tanya O’Carroll, Director, Amnesty Tech, Amnesty International
Tanya O’Carroll, Director, Amnesty Tech, Amnesty International
Meeri Haataja, CEO & Co-Founder, Saidot.ai
Meeri Haataja, CEO & Co-Founder, Saidot.ai
Menno Ettemma, Policy Officer, Inclusion and Anti-Discrimination, Council of Europe
Menno Ettemma, Policy Officer, Inclusion and Anti-Discrimination, Council of Europe




[[Category:2019]][[Category:Sessions 2019]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Side events 2019]][[Category:Human rights 2019]]
[[Category:2019]][[Category:Sessions 2019]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Side events 2019]][[Category:Human rights 2019]]

Revision as of 16:12, 26 April 2019

Consolidated programme 2019 overview

To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page


Final title of the session: Please send the final title until latest to wiki@eurodig.org. Do not edit the title of the page at the wiki on your own. The link to your session may otherwise disappear.

Working title: Council of Europe – AI as a risk to enhance discrimination

Session teaser

Until .

Session description

AI can have discriminatory effects, for instance because of data based on biased human decisions. In the public and private sector, AI-enabled decisions are made in many key areas of life – recruitment, admission to universities, credit, insurance, eligibility for pension payments, housing assistance, or unemployment benefits, predictive policing, judicial decisions and many more. Many small decisions, taken together, can have large effects. Non-discrimination law and data protection law, if effectively enforced could address AI-driven discrimination. However, there is a deficit of awareness law enforcement and monitoring bodies and the general public. AI also enables new types of unfair differentiation or discrimination that escape current laws. Most non-discrimination statutes only apply to discrimination on the basis of protected characteristics, such as skin color while AI system invents new classes, which do not correlate with protected characteristics, to differentiate between people. We probably need additional regulation to protect fairness and human rights in the area of AI. But is regulating AI in general the right approach, as the use of AI systems is too varied for one set of rules. In different sectors, different values are at stake, and different problems arise. Therefore, sector-specific rules should be considered. The community of industry, public authorities and civil society should address this issue in the current Internet governance debate.

Format

Until .

Pre-events should give the opportunity to create synergies with 3 rd parties i.e. Dynamic Coalitions, Partners. No session principles apply. They are held on day zero in parallel to setting up the venue for EuroDIG. We provide limited technical support.

Let us know here what you want to do.

Further reading

Until .

Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. Example for an external link: Main page of EuroDIG

People

Prof. Borgesius, Prof. Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, Professor of Law, Radboud University, NL (moderator)

Kirsi Pimiä, Anti-Discrimination Ombudsman, Finland

Tanya O’Carroll, Director, Amnesty Tech, Amnesty International

Meeri Haataja, CEO & Co-Founder, Saidot.ai

Menno Ettemma, Policy Officer, Inclusion and Anti-Discrimination, Council of Europe