Criminal justice in cyberspace – more of everything? – WS 11 2019: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:


== Further reading ==  
== Further reading ==  
EU [https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/criminal-justice/e-evidence-cross-border-access-electronic-evidence_en E-Evidence Proposal] 
*EU [https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/criminal-justice/e-evidence-cross-border-access-electronic-evidence_en E-Evidence Proposal] 
[https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/the-budapest-convention Budapest Convention on Cybercrime]
*[https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/the-budapest-convention Budapest Convention on Cybercrime]
[https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/t-cy-drafting-group Second Draft Protocol] to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
*[https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/t-cy-drafting-group Second Draft Protocol] to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
[https://gdpr-info.eu/ General Data Protection Regulation]
*[https://gdpr-info.eu/ General Data Protection Regulation]
Council of Europe work on [https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/tb Transborder Access to Data]
*Council of Europe work on [https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/tb Transborder Access to Data]
Human rights approach to cybercrime – [https://rm.coe.int/conditions-and-safeguards-under-article-15-of-the-convention-on-cyberc/16808f1e39 Example from the Eastern Partnership countries]
*Human rights approach to cybercrime – [https://rm.coe.int/conditions-and-safeguards-under-article-15-of-the-convention-on-cyberc/16808f1e39 Example from the Eastern Partnership countries]
[https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence Council of Europe and Artificial Intelligence]
*[https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence Council of Europe and Artificial Intelligence]
Europol [https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/internet-organised-crime-threat-assessment Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment (iOCTA)]
*Europol [https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/internet-organised-crime-threat-assessment Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment (iOCTA)]


== People ==  
== People ==  

Revision as of 11:42, 23 May 2019

Consolidated programme 2019 overview

Title: Criminal justice in cyberspace – more of everything?

Proposals assigned to this session: ID 35, 36, 39, 130, 200, 204, 206 – list of all proposals as pdf

You are invited to become a member of the session Org Team! By joining an Org Team you agree to that your name and affiliation will be published at the respective wiki page of the session for transparency reasons. Please subscribe to the session mailing list and answer the email that will be send to you requesting your confirmation of subscription.

Session teaser

The session will look into aspects of criminal justice in cyberspace from the perspective of applicable regulations, access to evidence and human rights, public-private cooperation and technical aspects of investigations.

The discussion will revolve around recent legislative initiatives from the EU and the Council of Europe addressing cooperation on cybercrime and electronic evidence, seek various perspectives on public-private cooperation, weight on human rights issues of access to electronic evidence in light of GDPR, and will attempt to provide a brief outlook on technical aspects of cybercrime investigations with particular focus on AI.

Session description

Until .

Always use your own words to describe the session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.

Format

Until .

Please try out new interactive formats. EuroDIG is about dialogue not about statements, presentations and speeches. Workshops should not be organised as a small plenary.

Further reading

People

Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.

Focal Point

  • Giorgi Jokhadze, Council of Europe

Organising Team (Org Team) List them here as they sign up.

  • Zoey Barthelemy
  • Tjabbe Bos
  • Nertil Berdufi, University College Beder
  • Irina Drexler, Council of Europe
  • Desara Dushi, SEEDIG Programme Committee
  • Catherine Garcia-van Hoogstraten, Centre of Expertise Cyber Security- Cybersecurity for SMEs, The Hague University of Applied Sciences (THUAS)
  • Kristina Olausson, ETNO - European Telecommunications Network Operators' Association
  • Corien van Pinxteren

Key Participants

  • Lise Fuhr, Director General, European Telecommunications Network – Link to profile
  • Markko Kunnapu, Advisor to the Ministry of Justice of Estonia, Member of the Cybercrime Convention Committee Bureau - LinkedIn
  • Acadia Senese, Legal Counsel, Law Enforcement & Information Security, Google - LinkedIn
  • Gregory Mounier, Head of Outreach at European Cybercrime Centre (EC3), EUROPOL - LinkedIn
  • Participant from academia/civil society (TBC)

Moderator The session will have two moderators:

  • Tatiana Tropina, Senior Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, LinkedIn
  • Irina Drexler, Cybercrime Programme Office of the Council of Europe, LinkedIn

Remote Moderator

Trained remote moderators will be assigned on the spot by the EuroDIG secretariat to each session.

Reporter

  • Andrijana Gavrilovic, Geneva Internet Platform

The Reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:

  • are summarised on a slide and presented to the audience at the end of each session
  • relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
  • are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
  • are in (rough) consensus with the audience

Current discussion, conference calls, schedules and minutes

The discussions in the Org Team for the session took part primarily as email exchanges on the mailing list for the Workshop, with several major milestones:

  • On 18.03.19, the initial sequence of topics and work-plan for Org Team was suggested and discussed; further, call for speakers/key participants was launched and responses from the Org Team collated;
  • On 06.04.19, the sequence of themes was further refined and identity of potential speakers discussed; communications with Org Team on these matters were summarized on 17.04.19;
  • Session title was established through Doodle poll on 14.04.19;
  • Session description and format communicated and discussed on 12.05.19;
  • Individual communications with key participants and potential speakers still ongoing.

Messages

A short summary of the session will be provided by the Reporter.

Video record

Will be provided here after the event.

Transcript

Will be provided here after the event.