Critical Internet literacy – WS 10 2017

From EuroDIG Wiki
Revision as of 14:58, 23 May 2017 by LeeH (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Critical internet literacy – WS 10 2017

Programme overview 2017 Consolidated programme 2018 overview

To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page


Final title of the session: Please send the final title until latest to wiki@eurodig.org. Do not edit the title of the page at the wiki on your own. The link to your session may otherwise disappear.

Session teaser

Developing a rationale and strategy to develop competences on Internet Literacy in times of crisis such as ours: fake news, propaganda, radicalization, rumours and hoaxes, ...

Keywords

Internet literacy, fake news, Big-data analytics, Internet of Things, best practices, training, online freedom, privacy, identity

Session description

There is a need to develop a rationale and strategy to develop competences on Internet literacy in times of crisis such as ours: fake news, propaganda, radicalization, rumours and hoaxes and so on. This can be a threat to full citizenship online and is starting to damage our trust in the Internet and the legitimacy of its governance. In and beyond formal school education, critical Internet literacy is necessary for the digital transformation of young people and adults to:

  • assess the main social and legal issues that affect their digital transformation (online freedoms, privacy, identity),
  • decide and make choices, in a creative and critical thinking manner, which affect their values,
  • understand the way the Internet is managed and owned.

Outcome

The outcome of this workshop is to decide on a way forward on how to reach out to citizens in order to provide them with “Critical Internet Literacy 101” information and skills to enable them to shape their digital identities and collective belief and culture in the Internet of the future.

Agenda

1. What is “critical” Internet literacy?

  • Kimmo Aulake, Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland
  • Vincent Bonnet, European Bureau of Library, Information and Documentation Associations (EBLIDA)
  • Indrek Ibrus, Tallinn University, Estonia

2. Best practices

  • Xianhong Hu, UNESCO
  • Pascale Serrier, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
  • Vitor Tome, Universidade do Algarve

3. Way forward

  • Peter Krantz, International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA)
  • Yves Matthieu, Missions Publiques
  • Cristina Monti, European Commission (TBC)
  • Siobhan Montgomery, Council of Europe

4. Concluding remarks

  • Divina Frau-Meigs, Savoir*Devenir (rapporteur)

Format

Moderated dialogue with a limited number of panelists and wrap-up on the following:

  • What is «critical Internet literacy» ?,
  • Best practices,
  • Way forward – what and how do we get there?

Further reading

Until 30 April 2017. Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. Example for an external link: Main page of EuroDIG

Digitisation and Culture, Council of Europe

People

Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.

  • Focal Point: Divina Frau-Meigs (Savoir*Devenir/Know*ing), Kathrin Merkle (Council of Europe)

Focal Points take over the responsibility and lead of the session organisation. Focal Points are kindly requested to observe EuroDIG's session principles. Focal Points work in close cooperation with the respective Subject Matter Expert (SME) and the EuroDIG Secretariat.

  • Subject Matter Expert (SME)

SMEs are responsible for the clustering of submissions into a thematic category they have an expertise in. They define subtopics and identify submissions which fall under this subtopic. The aim is to verify submissions which can be merged in one session. In the course of the session organising process SMEs will serve as a mentor for the respective category by supporting all Focal Points.

  • Key Participants (for workshop) or Panellists (for plenary)

Until 15 May 2017. Key Participants (workshop) are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session – not necessarily on stage. Key Participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Panellist (plenary) will be selected and assigned by the org team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance. Panellists should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Please provide short CV’s of the Key Participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.

  • Moderator: Lee Hibbard (Council of Europe)

The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers. Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.

  • Remote Moderator: Zakir Syed (ICANN)

The Remote Moderator is in charge of facilitating participation via digital channels such as WebEx and social medial (Twitter, facebook). Remote Moderators monitor and moderate the social media channels and the participants via WebEX and forward questions to the session moderator. Please contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a remote moderator.

  • Organising Team (Org Team): Divina Frau-Meigs (Savoir*Devenir/Know*ing), Kathrin Merkle (Council of Europe), Lee Hibbard (Council of Europe), Zakir Syed (ICANN), Stephen Wyber (International Federation of Library Associations - IFLA), Pascale Garreau (Savoir*Devenir)

The Org Team is a group of people shaping the session. Org Teams are open and every interested individual can become a member.

  • Reporter

Until 15 May 2017. The Reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:

  • are summarised on a slide and presented to the audience at the end of each session
  • relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
  • are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
  • are in (rough) consensus with the audience
  • are to be submitted to the secretariat within 48 hours after the session took place

Please provide short CV of the reporter of your session at the Wiki or link to another source and contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a reporter.

Current discussion, conference calls, schedules and minutes

See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page. Please use this page to publish:

  • dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
  • short summary of calls or email exchange

Please be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you. Use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize the discussion process.

Contact

Get in contact with the Org Team by sending an email.

Video record

Will be provided here after the event.

Transcript

Will be provided here after the event.

Messages

Please provide a short summary from the outcome of your session. Bullet points are fine.