DNS Abuse – the consequences of definitions – Pre 03 2022: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
20 June 2021 | 11:15 - 12:45 CEST (TBC) | SISSA Main Auditorium <br />
20 June 2022 | 11:15 - 12:45 CEST | FabLab / Fibonacci | [[image:Icons_live_20px.png | Video recording | link=https://youtu.be/vUuaXXsRdD4?t=1071]]<br />
[[Consolidated_programme_2022#day-0|'''Consolidated programme 2022 overview / Day 0''']]<br /><br />
[[Consolidated_programme_2022#day-0|'''Consolidated programme 2022 overview / Day 0''']]<br /><br />
{{Sessionadvice-Pre-2022}}
Working title: <big>'''Dynamic Coalition on Data and Trust''' (DC-DT)</big><br /><br />
== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
In recent years, internet governance communities have been debating how to define 'DNS Abuse'. The issue remains contested, and consensus seems elusive. But why does it matter how you define the term? What are the consequences for the different stakeholders? Where is the common ground between the various viewpoints? Join this session to find out.


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  
Always use your own words to describe your session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.
This round table discussion will bring together diverse stakeholder voices to debate the consequences of a definition: DNS Abuse.
 
The DNS industry defines the term narrowly, drawing bright lines between the technical function of the DNS and issues relating to online content. The Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network has produced an influential toolkit for report handling, which provides practical guidance for DNS registries, registrars, hosting providers and reporters of abuse.
 
In January 2022, the European Commission published a report by the Fasano Paulovics law firm and the University of Grenoble, which defined DNS Abuse broadly, as "any activity that makes use of domain names or the DNS protocol to carry out harmful or illegal activity." The report contained detailed empirical evidence, and made recommendations for policy makers and industry.
 
The session will hear from advocates of the various definitions of DNS Abuse, and through structured discussion, identify critiques and consequences of the differing approaches, and explore areas of common ground for future actions.  


== Format ==  
== Format ==  
Pre-events should give the opportunity to create synergies with 3 rd parties i.e. Dynamic Coalitions, Partners. No session principles apply. They are held on day zero in parallel to setting up the venue for EuroDIG. We provide limited technical support.
The session will be held online only, allowing for inclusive participation and debate. There will be up to 3 introductory speakers, and a moderated discussion among all participants.  
 
Let us know here what you want to do.


== Further reading ==  
== Further reading ==  
Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. Example for an external link: [http://www.eurodig.org/ Main page of EuroDIG]
*Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network, Toolkit, DNS Level Actions to Address Abuses https://www.internetjurisdiction.net/domains/toolkit
*European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Paulovics, I., Duda, A., Korczynski, M., Study on Domain Name System (DNS) abuse, 2022, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/616244
*CENTR publishes comment on the European Commission's DNS Abuse study https://centr.org/news/news/comment-dns-abuse-study.html


== People ==  
== People ==  
Key participants:
'''Session organisers:'''
*Emily Taylor, CEO, Oxford Information Labs.
*Carolina Caeiro, Senior Policy and Governance Specialist, Oxford Information Labs.
*Regina Fuchsová, Regional Manager Central Europe, EURid.
 
'''Moderation:'''
 
*Emily Taylor, CEO, Oxford Information Labs.


Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.
'''Key participants:'''


Example for a list:
*Peter Van Roste, General Manager, CENTR.
*Person 1
*Lisa-Maria Neudert, Doctoral Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute. Fellow, Weizenbaum Institut.
*Person 2
*Jeffrey Bedser, Executive Chair, iThreat. 
*Sameh Mannai, Data Scientist, EURid.
*Gemma Carolillo, Acting Head of Unit, Next Generation Internet, European Commission.


[[Category:2022]][[Category:Sessions 2022]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Side events 2022]][[Category:Cross cutting/other issues 2022]]
[[Category:2022]][[Category:Sessions 2022]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Side events 2022]][[Category:Cross cutting/other issues 2022]]

Latest revision as of 10:42, 4 July 2022

20 June 2022 | 11:15 - 12:45 CEST | FabLab / Fibonacci | Video recording
Consolidated programme 2022 overview / Day 0

Session teaser

In recent years, internet governance communities have been debating how to define 'DNS Abuse'. The issue remains contested, and consensus seems elusive. But why does it matter how you define the term? What are the consequences for the different stakeholders? Where is the common ground between the various viewpoints? Join this session to find out.

Session description

This round table discussion will bring together diverse stakeholder voices to debate the consequences of a definition: DNS Abuse.

The DNS industry defines the term narrowly, drawing bright lines between the technical function of the DNS and issues relating to online content. The Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network has produced an influential toolkit for report handling, which provides practical guidance for DNS registries, registrars, hosting providers and reporters of abuse.

In January 2022, the European Commission published a report by the Fasano Paulovics law firm and the University of Grenoble, which defined DNS Abuse broadly, as "any activity that makes use of domain names or the DNS protocol to carry out harmful or illegal activity." The report contained detailed empirical evidence, and made recommendations for policy makers and industry.

The session will hear from advocates of the various definitions of DNS Abuse, and through structured discussion, identify critiques and consequences of the differing approaches, and explore areas of common ground for future actions.

Format

The session will be held online only, allowing for inclusive participation and debate. There will be up to 3 introductory speakers, and a moderated discussion among all participants.

Further reading

People

Session organisers:

  • Emily Taylor, CEO, Oxford Information Labs.
  • Carolina Caeiro, Senior Policy and Governance Specialist, Oxford Information Labs.
  • Regina Fuchsová, Regional Manager Central Europe, EURid.

Moderation:

  • Emily Taylor, CEO, Oxford Information Labs.

Key participants:

  • Peter Van Roste, General Manager, CENTR.
  • Lisa-Maria Neudert, Doctoral Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute. Fellow, Weizenbaum Institut.
  • Jeffrey Bedser, Executive Chair, iThreat.
  • Sameh Mannai, Data Scientist, EURid.
  • Gemma Carolillo, Acting Head of Unit, Next Generation Internet, European Commission.