Global digital governance – can technical solutions respond to policy questions? – PL 01 2019
Final title of the session: Please send the final title until 15 April 2019 latest to email@example.com. Do not edit the title of the page at the wiki on your own. The link to your session may otherwise disappear.
Working title: Global digital governance – can technical solutions respond to policy questions?
Proposals assigned to this session: ID 93, 140, 142, 148, 159, 162, 171, Paris call – list of all proposals as pdf
You are invited to become a member of the session Org Team! By joining an Org Team you agree to that your name and affiliation will be published at the respective wiki page of the session for transparency reasons. Please subscribe to the session mailing list and answer the email that will be send to you requesting your confirmation of subscription.
Focal point for this session is Maarten Botterman email. If you would just like to leave a comment feel free to use the discussion-page here at the wiki, or email Maarten directly. Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org to get access to the wiki.
Can we find technical solutions for political issues? And what political action is needed to be able to embrace new technical solutions to be sustainable, supportive of human dignity and contributing to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? This, and more, will be discussed by a multistakeholder panel, with participation of all in the room.
In recent years a number of high-level political initiatives have contributed to the further evolution of the Internet Governance Ecosystem and its political framework. Examples are the „London Process” with its Global Cybersecurity Conference, the Global Commission on Stability in Cyberspace, the Paris Call for Trust and Security in Cyberspace, the UN High Level Panel on Digital Cooperation and industry led initiatives as the Tech Accord (Microsoft), the Charter of Trust (Siemens) and the Contract for the Web (W3C).
All of those initiatives are supporting the multistakeholder approach and have developed new forms of interaction among governments, business, civil society and the technical community. However, with latest developments in fields like artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, cloud computing and blockchain, there is a growing need to go beyond the traditional multistakeholder cooperation and to deepen the interaction among law makers and code makers.
Can we find technical solutions for political issues? And what political action is needed to be able to embrace new technical solutions to be sustainable, supportive of human dignity and contributing to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? Do we need new forms of policy development and decision making if it comes to issues like cybersecurity and lethal autonomous weapon system, like digital trade and sustainable digital development as well as the protection of freedom of expression and privacy in the digital age? And how can new intergovernmental projects as the Global Compact, the G20 Osaka Fast Track or the two new cybersecurity groups under the 1st Committee of the UN General Assembly contribute to a secure, free, open and stable Internet?
The panel of esteemed thought and action leaders in the field is invited to leapfrog to the future in 2030, and add their description of that future including a statement of what, most importantly, needed to happen in 2020 to make this possible.
Based on this, the panel will engage which each other with the aim to end up with a top three recommendations for action in the coming year, to help ensure we are moving towards a future we want.
Following the "lightning talk" by Jonathan and Jaya, a panel of 4 people from different stakeholder groups will be invited by the two co-moderators to lead in a discussion, to which all participants in the room are invited to contribute. By putting the perspective on 2030, and "looking back from the future" to what needs to be done today to work towards the best possible future tomorrow, this session will be of interest to policy makers and all that are to contribute to making a future we want happen!
Panelists (all confirmed):
- Mattia Fantinati (State Secretary for Public Administration, Italy): government perspective;
- Anriette Esterhuysen (former CEO of APC, Member of GCSC): civil society perspective;
- Bill Woodcock Woodcock (executive director of Packet Clearing House, Member of GCSC): technical community perspective;
- Jaya Baloo (Chief Information Security Officer KNP): business perspective.
The session will be moderated by Emily Taylor (Oxford Information Labs) and Maarten Botterman (GNKS). Jonathan Cave will join as resource to the panel. Moderators will invite interaction with other EuroDIG participants in the room.
Until 30 April 2019.
Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. Example for an external link: Website of EuroDIG
Until 15 May 2019.
Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.
- Maarten Botterman / GNKS Consult, ICANN Board
Organising Team (Org Team) List them here as they sign up.
- Andrea Beccalli, ICANN
- Ayden Férdeline, Technology Policy Fellow, Mozilla
- Kristina Olausson, ETNO - European Telecommunications Network Operators' Association
- Arnold van Rhijn, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy of the Netherlands
- Marjolijn Bonthuis, Deputy director ECP, information society platform & coordinator NLIGF
- Wout de Natris, De Natris Consult
- Adam Peake, ICANN
- Emily Taylor, Oxford Information Labs and Chatham House
The session will be co-moderated by Emily Taylor and Maarten Botterman. The moderators will facilitate the session, including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants.
Trained remote moderators will be assigned on the spot by the EuroDIG secretariat to each session.
- Stefania Grottola, Geneva Internet Platform
Reporters will be assigned by the EuroDIG secretariat in cooperation with the Geneva Internet Platform. The Reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:
- are summarised on a slide and presented to the audience at the end of each session
- relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
- are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
- are in (rough) consensus with the audience
Current discussion, conference calls, schedules and minutes
See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page. Please use this page to publish:
- dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
- short summary of calls or email exchange
Please be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you. Use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize the discussion process.
A short summary of the session will be provided by the Reporter.
Will be provided here after the event.
Will be provided here after the event.