How can the open Internet coexist with new IP services? – PL 03 2015: Difference between revisions
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
*[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2014/518751/IPOL_STU%282014%29518751_EN.pdf EU Parliament IMCO Report on Net Neutrality Revisited: Challenges and Responses in the EU and the US] | *[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2014/518751/IPOL_STU%282014%29518751_EN.pdf EU Parliament IMCO Report on Net Neutrality Revisited: Challenges and Responses in the EU and the US] | ||
*[http://www.internetsociety.org/doc/value-openness-sustainable-internet ISOC White Paper on The Value of Openness for a Sustainable Internet] | *[http://www.internetsociety.org/doc/value-openness-sustainable-internet ISOC White Paper on The Value of Openness for a Sustainable Internet] | ||
*[http://www.ceps.be/system/files/SR104_AR_NetNeutrality.pdf Renda, Andrea. Antitrust, Regulation and the Neutrality Trap: | *[http://www.ceps.be/system/files/SR104_AR_NetNeutrality.pdf Renda, Andrea. Antitrust, Regulation and the Neutrality Trap: A plea for a smart, evidence-based internet policy] | ||
A plea for a smart, evidence-based internet policy] | |||
== People == | == People == | ||
Revision as of 20:03, 26 May 2015
Open call for input: comment on our multistakeholder draft statement on net neutrality
Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.
This session intends to open the NN Pandora box and clarifies issues per angles and/or perspectives which will include end-users, Human Rights, businesses, technology, commonly agreed definitions and principles
Session description
Open call for input on our net neutrality draft statement! See the discussion tab at the top of the page
Keywords
end-users, human rights, businesses, technology, common definitions and agreed principles, net neutrality
Further reading
- Net Neutrality: Reflections on the Current Debate
- BEREC and European Commission Report on A view of traffic management and other practices resulting in restrictions to the open Internet in Europe
- Council of Europe CDMSI Paper on Protecting Human Rights through Network Neutrality: Furthering Internet Users’ Interest, Modernising Human Rights and Safeguarding the Open Internet
- IGF Dynamic Coalition Reports on The Value of Network Neutrality for the Internet of Tomorrow
- IGF Dynamic Coalition Reports on Network Neutrality: an Ongoing Regulatory Debate
- EU Parliament IMCO Report on Net Neutrality Revisited: Challenges and Responses in the EU and the US
- ISOC White Paper on The Value of Openness for a Sustainable Internet
- Renda, Andrea. Antitrust, Regulation and the Neutrality Trap: A plea for a smart, evidence-based internet policy
People
- Focal Point: Frédéric Donck
- Org team:
- Luca Belli
- Mat Ford
- Thomas Grob
- Yasen Gyurov
- Lorena Jaume-Palasi (Eurodig Sec.)
- Gonzalo Lopez Barajashude
- Erika Mann
- Andy O'Donnell
- Michael Kende
- Konstantinos Komaitis
- Nebojsa Regoje
- Key participants|Panelists: (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
- Moderator: (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
- Reporter: (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
- Remote moderator: (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
Current discussion
See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page
Mailing list
Contact: pl3@eurodig.org
Live stream / remote participation
Final report
Session twitter hashtag
Hashtag: #eurodigNN