How can the open Internet coexist with new IP services? – PL 03 2015: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
(21 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
----
'''Open call for input: comment on our [http://www.eurodig.org/eurodig-2015/net-neutrality-statement/# multistakeholder draft statement on net neutrality]'''
----
----
----
'''Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.'''
'''Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.'''
Line 12: Line 8:
== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  


'''[http://www.eurodig.org/eurodig-2015/net-neutrality-statement/# Open call for input on our net neutrality draft statement!]'''
'''[http://www.eurodig.org/archives/eurodig15/net-neutrality-statement/ See the net neutrality statement]'''
See the [http://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Net_neutrality discussion tab at the top of the page]
and also check the [http://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Net_neutrality discussion tab at the top of the page]


== Keywords ==
== Keywords ==
Line 19: Line 15:


== Further reading ==  
== Further reading ==  
Deadline 30. April 2015
*[https://ourinternet.org/publication/net-neutrality-reflections-on-the-current-debate/ Net Neutrality: Reflections on the Current Debate]
*[http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/Traffic%20Management%20Investigation%20BEREC_2.pdf BEREC and European Commission Report on A view of traffic management and other practices resulting in restrictions to the open Internet in Europe]
*[https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/media/cdmsi/CDMSI%282013%29Misc19_en.pdf Council of Europe CDMSI Paper on Protecting Human Rights through Network Neutrality: Furthering Internet Users’ Interest, Modernising Human Rights and Safeguarding the Open Internet]
*[http://nebula.wsimg.com/c65488b3edff49adc2dba84e344591bd?AccessKeyId=B45063449B96D27B8F85&disposition=0 IGF Dynamic Coalition Reports on The Value of Network Neutrality for the Internet of Tomorrow]
*[http://www.networkneutrality.info/sources.html IGF Dynamic Coalition Reports on Network Neutrality: an Ongoing Regulatory Debate]
*[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2014/518751/IPOL_STU%282014%29518751_EN.pdf EU Parliament IMCO Report on Net Neutrality Revisited: Challenges and Responses in the EU and the US]
*[http://www.internetsociety.org/doc/value-openness-sustainable-internet ISOC White Paper on The Value of Openness for a Sustainable Internet]
*[http://www.ceps.be/system/files/SR104_AR_NetNeutrality.pdf Renda, Andrea. Antitrust, Regulation and the Neutrality Trap: A plea for a smart, evidence-based internet policy]
 
== People ==  
== People ==  
*'''Focal Point''': Frédéric Donck
*'''Focal Point''': Frédéric Donck
Line 27: Line 31:
**Thomas Grob
**Thomas Grob
**Yasen Gyurov  
**Yasen Gyurov  
**Lorena Jaume-Palasi (Eurodig Sec.)
**Lorena Jaume-Palasi, Eurodig
**Gonzalo Lopez Barajashude
**Gonzalo Lopez Barajashude
**Wouter Gekiere
**Anne-Catherine Berg
**Erika Mann
**Erika Mann
**Andy O'Donnell
**Andy O'Donnell
Line 34: Line 40:
**Konstantinos Komaitis
**Konstantinos Komaitis
**Nebojsa Regoje
**Nebojsa Regoje
*'''Key participants'''|'''Panelists''': (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
*'''Key participants'''|'''Panelists''':  
*'''Moderator''': (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
**Amelia Andersdotter, FITUG
**Luca Belli, Center for Technology & Society @ Fundaçao Getulio Vargas
**Eva Paunova, Member of the European Parliament
**Frode Sørensen, Norwegian Communications Authority (Nkom)
**Christoph Steck, Telefónica
*'''Moderator''': Frédéric Donck, ISOC Europe
*'''Reporter''': (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
*'''Reporter''': (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
*'''Remote moderator''': (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
*'''Remote moderator''': Lianna Galstyan, ISOC Armenia


== Current discussion ==
== Current discussion ==
Line 45: Line 56:
Contact: pl3@eurodig.org
Contact: pl3@eurodig.org


== Live stream / remote participation ==  
== Video record ==
== Final report ==
[https://youtu.be/gP4RbqjxYjk Video record]
 
== Final report ==
*The session began with discussion that "network neutrality" is not well-defined and this leaves a good bit of room for disagreement about what is being discussed.
*There was general agreement that the Internet is a "network of networks", but a key question raised in the context of the discussion was whether discussion is about a single "intranet" network within a single operator, or about the larger "network of networks.
*Similarly, there was concern about how you define "specialized services" and whether they were in fact separate from the Internet or whether they represented a prioritized level of service.
*Concerns were raised that the technical processes used for "traffic management" such as deep packet inspection (DPI) threaten human rights such as freedom of expression due to the fact that the content needs to be inspected.
*The panel had a lengthy discussion of the impact of competition on the investment in and availability of higher-speed network services. There were very different views with some believing competition was critical while others saying the impact was overrated.
*There was a brief discussion of "zero rating" with again widely-diverging viewpoints. Some viewed zero rating as a threat to freedom of expression while others dismissed it as a simple commercial business practice.
 
== Session twitter hashtag ==   
== Session twitter hashtag ==   
Hashtag: #eurodigNN
Hashtag: #eurodigNN


[[Category:Sessions 2015]][[Category:Innovation and economic development]]
[[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Sessions 2015]][[Category:Innovation and economic development]][[Category:Innovation and economic development 2015]]

Revision as of 12:45, 17 December 2015


Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.


Session teaser

This session intends to open the NN Pandora box and clarifies issues per angles and/or perspectives which will include end-users, Human Rights, businesses, technology, commonly agreed definitions and principles

Session description

See the net neutrality statement and also check the discussion tab at the top of the page

Keywords

end-users, human rights, businesses, technology, common definitions and agreed principles, net neutrality

Further reading

People

  • Focal Point: Frédéric Donck
  • Org team:
    • Luca Belli
    • Mat Ford
    • Thomas Grob
    • Yasen Gyurov
    • Lorena Jaume-Palasi, Eurodig
    • Gonzalo Lopez Barajashude
    • Wouter Gekiere
    • Anne-Catherine Berg
    • Erika Mann
    • Andy O'Donnell
    • Michael Kende
    • Konstantinos Komaitis
    • Nebojsa Regoje
  • Key participants|Panelists:
    • Amelia Andersdotter, FITUG
    • Luca Belli, Center for Technology & Society @ Fundaçao Getulio Vargas
    • Eva Paunova, Member of the European Parliament
    • Frode Sørensen, Norwegian Communications Authority (Nkom)
    • Christoph Steck, Telefónica
  • Moderator: Frédéric Donck, ISOC Europe
  • Reporter: (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
  • Remote moderator: Lianna Galstyan, ISOC Armenia

Current discussion

See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page

Mailing list

Contact: pl3@eurodig.org

Video record

Video record

Final report

  • The session began with discussion that "network neutrality" is not well-defined and this leaves a good bit of room for disagreement about what is being discussed.
  • There was general agreement that the Internet is a "network of networks", but a key question raised in the context of the discussion was whether discussion is about a single "intranet" network within a single operator, or about the larger "network of networks.
  • Similarly, there was concern about how you define "specialized services" and whether they were in fact separate from the Internet or whether they represented a prioritized level of service.
  • Concerns were raised that the technical processes used for "traffic management" such as deep packet inspection (DPI) threaten human rights such as freedom of expression due to the fact that the content needs to be inspected.
  • The panel had a lengthy discussion of the impact of competition on the investment in and availability of higher-speed network services. There were very different views with some believing competition was critical while others saying the impact was overrated.
  • There was a brief discussion of "zero rating" with again widely-diverging viewpoints. Some viewed zero rating as a threat to freedom of expression while others dismissed it as a simple commercial business practice.

Session twitter hashtag

Hashtag: #eurodigNN