How do transnational data flows affect users’ trust? – PL 1 Part 2 2016: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 49: Line 49:
[https://arkadin-emea.adobeconnect.com/telemak_140436_eurodig_gold/ Find the link here]
[https://arkadin-emea.adobeconnect.com/telemak_140436_eurodig_gold/ Find the link here]


== Final report ==   
== Messages ==   
* There is no trade-off between Privacy & Security
* There is no trade-off between Privacy & Security
* Security needs to be a collaborative effort / Subsidiarity works: intervene at the least intrusive level possible!
* Security needs to be a collaborative effort / Subsidiarity works: intervene at the least intrusive level possible!

Revision as of 09:25, 17 June 2016


Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.


To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page

Session teaser

We take up the discussion where the morning session ended and re-visit the more controversial issues. [Open discussion format – NO Panelists!]

Session description

We continue the discussion started in the morning session [[1]]and dive deeper into the more controversial issues.

Keywords

Big Data, Transnational Data Flows, International agreements, data-related technologies, algorithmic technology and decision making, artificial intelligence, privacy, security, user trust, innovation, European economic divide

Format

Please try new interactive formats out. EuroDIG is about dialogue not about statements.

Further reading

Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, only links to external resources are possible.

People

  • Focal Point: Thomas Grob, Deutsche Telekom AG, Germany/Switzerland
  • Key participants: Everyone interested in continuing the discussion.
  • Moderator: Frederic Donck (ISOC)
  • Remote moderator: Allon Bar
  • Org team
  • Ana Kakalashvili, GIZ GmbH, Georgia/Germany
  • Marco Pancini, Google, Belgium
  • Frédéric Donck, ISOC, Belgium
  • Karen McCabe, IEEE, USA
  • Justin Caso, IEEE, USA
  • Reporter: Thomas Grob (Deutsche Telekom AG)

Current discussion

See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page.

Conference call. Schedules and minutes

  • dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
  • short summary of calls or email exchange
  • be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you
  • use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize and publish the discussion process

Mailing list

Contact: pl1@eurodig.org

Remote participation

Find the link here

Messages

  • There is no trade-off between Privacy & Security
  • Security needs to be a collaborative effort / Subsidiarity works: intervene at the least intrusive level possible!
  • The multistakeholder model offers the tools to solve complex issues – approach needs to be open, transparent, inclusive, accountable – needs active engagement; we need to do more!
  • Transparency and Openness are meaningless, if people do not understand what is being disclosed or in case there is no alternative option.
  • Openness requires shared responsibility: companies and governments may not solely and completely be held responsible for what people do online.

Session twitter hashtag

Hashtag: #eurodig16 #trust