Difference between revisions of "Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network – Flash 03 2017"

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
{{Sessionadvice01}}
 
{{Sessionadvice01}}
 
== Session teaser ==
 
== Session teaser ==
'''Until 10 May 2017.'''
+
Internet & Jurisdiction’s Flash Session aims to give insight into the fundamental questions underlying each of Internet & Jurisdiction’s three programs:<br />
 +
[[File:Data Content Domains Programs Questions Internet Jurisdiction.png]]
  
 
== Keywords ==
 
== Keywords ==
'''Until 10 May 2017.''' They will be used as hash tags for easy searching on the wiki
+
Jurisdiction, user data, content removals, DNS, transnational governance
  
 
== Session description ==  
 
== Session description ==  
'''Until 20 May 2017.'''
+
Jurisdiction is a topic that is increasingly high on the Internet Governance agenda. However, understanding the multitude of cross-cutting jurisdictional challenges on the internet can be difficult. Join Internet & Jurisdiction for a Flash Session for a brief outline of current jurisdictional dynamics and a better understanding of the fundamental questions underlying each of Internet & Jurisdiction’s three programs.
Always use your own words to describe your session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.
+
 
 +
[http://www.internetjurisdiction.net/work/data-jurisdiction DATA & JURISDICTION] - How can transnational data flows and the protection of privacy be reconciled with lawful access requirements to address crime?
 +
Criminal investigations increasingly require access to information about users and digital evidence stored by private companies in jurisdictions outside of the requesting country. Existing systems for cross-border user data requests are under stress, and the problem is compounded by the difficulties of determining location and jurisdictional nexus in investigations. What are the necessary safeguards and procedures to establish viable and scalable frameworks?
 +
 
 +
[http://www.internetjurisdiction.net/work/content-jurisdiction CONTENT & JURISDICTION] - How can we manage globally-available content in light of the diversity of local laws and norms applicable on the internet?
 +
Content legal in one country can be illegal in another. Protecting freedom of expression and other human rights when dealing with hate speech, harassment, security threats, incitation to violence, and discrimination on the internet is a major challenge when several jurisdictions are involved. How can current practices be improved in terms of transparency and due process across borders?
 +
 
 +
[http://www.internetjurisdiction.net/work/domains-jurisdiction DOMAINS & JURISDICTION] - How can the neutrality of the internet’s technical layer be preserved when national laws are applied to the Domain Name System?
 +
Cross-border domain suspension requests are increasingly sent to technical operators based on the content or activities of underlying websites. Such measures have global impact by nature and therefore require strong procedural guarantees to ensure proportionality. Common vernacular must also be agreed upon between the technical and policymaking communities to permit fruitful discussions. What are the criteria for abuses that justify domain suspension, and how can the transparency of such requests be increased?
  
 
== Format ==  
 
== Format ==  
'''Until 20 May 2017.''' Please try out new interactive formats.
+
Flash session
  
 
== Further reading ==  
 
== Further reading ==  
'''Until 20 May 2017.''' Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible.  
+
[http://www.internetjurisdiction.net/uploads/pdfs/Papers/Data-Jurisdiction-Program-Paper.pdf Data & Jurisdiction Framing Paper]
Example for an external link: [http://www.eurodig.org/ Main page of EuroDIG]
+
[http://www.internetjurisdiction.net/uploads/pdfs/Papers/Content-Jurisdiction-Program-Paper.pdf Content & Jurisdiction Framing Paper]
 +
[http://www.internetjurisdiction.net/uploads/pdfs/Papers/Domains-Jurisdiction-Program-Paper.pdf Domains & Jurisdiction Framing Paper]
  
 
== People ==  
 
== People ==  
'''Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.'''
+
[http://www.internetjurisdiction.net/about/secretariat/ Internet & Jurisdiction Secretariat]
  
  
 
[[Category:2017]][[Category:Sessions 2017]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Flash 2017]]
 
[[Category:2017]][[Category:Sessions 2017]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Flash 2017]]

Revision as of 21:27, 15 May 2017

Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network – Flash 03 2017

Programme overview 2017 Consolidated programme 2018 overview

To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page


Final title of the session: Please send the final title until latest to wiki@eurodig.org. Do not edit the title of the page at the wiki on your own. The link to your session may otherwise disappear.

Session teaser

Internet & Jurisdiction’s Flash Session aims to give insight into the fundamental questions underlying each of Internet & Jurisdiction’s three programs:
Data Content Domains Programs Questions Internet Jurisdiction.png

Keywords

Jurisdiction, user data, content removals, DNS, transnational governance

Session description

Jurisdiction is a topic that is increasingly high on the Internet Governance agenda. However, understanding the multitude of cross-cutting jurisdictional challenges on the internet can be difficult. Join Internet & Jurisdiction for a Flash Session for a brief outline of current jurisdictional dynamics and a better understanding of the fundamental questions underlying each of Internet & Jurisdiction’s three programs.

DATA & JURISDICTION - How can transnational data flows and the protection of privacy be reconciled with lawful access requirements to address crime? Criminal investigations increasingly require access to information about users and digital evidence stored by private companies in jurisdictions outside of the requesting country. Existing systems for cross-border user data requests are under stress, and the problem is compounded by the difficulties of determining location and jurisdictional nexus in investigations. What are the necessary safeguards and procedures to establish viable and scalable frameworks?

CONTENT & JURISDICTION - How can we manage globally-available content in light of the diversity of local laws and norms applicable on the internet? Content legal in one country can be illegal in another. Protecting freedom of expression and other human rights when dealing with hate speech, harassment, security threats, incitation to violence, and discrimination on the internet is a major challenge when several jurisdictions are involved. How can current practices be improved in terms of transparency and due process across borders?

DOMAINS & JURISDICTION - How can the neutrality of the internet’s technical layer be preserved when national laws are applied to the Domain Name System? Cross-border domain suspension requests are increasingly sent to technical operators based on the content or activities of underlying websites. Such measures have global impact by nature and therefore require strong procedural guarantees to ensure proportionality. Common vernacular must also be agreed upon between the technical and policymaking communities to permit fruitful discussions. What are the criteria for abuses that justify domain suspension, and how can the transparency of such requests be increased?

Format

Flash session

Further reading

Data & Jurisdiction Framing Paper Content & Jurisdiction Framing Paper Domains & Jurisdiction Framing Paper

People

Internet & Jurisdiction Secretariat