List of proposals for EuroDIG 2023: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 154: Line 154:
|- id="prop_64"
|- id="prop_64"
| 64'''*''' || not assigned yet || Jörn Erbguth || EuroDIG || Civil society || || || <span class="table-squares-23 hu-ri">n</span> || || <span class="table-squares-23 m-a-c">n</span> || || || || When Elon Musik published the “Twitter files”, it created some controversy. Having discussed content moderation and possible bias of social media platforms over years, we should see it as an opportunity to look at the insights of a social media content moderation team. We see how content moderation and shadow banning of accounts work. We see how the collaboration with governments was done. The main question should not be, did we agree with the content that was removed, or do we like the people that were silenced. We know, a new owner can have different preferences and other governments can request to take down other content. We should rather ask ourselves, should a social media platform work this way? Do we need more transparency? What are the standards we should hold platforms accountable to? Will the coming Digital Services Act DSA create more transparency? Will the DSA offer an effective means of legal redress when such measures are being taken but not justified?
| 64'''*''' || not assigned yet || Jörn Erbguth || EuroDIG || Civil society || || || <span class="table-squares-23 hu-ri">n</span> || || <span class="table-squares-23 m-a-c">n</span> || || || || When Elon Musik published the “Twitter files”, it created some controversy. Having discussed content moderation and possible bias of social media platforms over years, we should see it as an opportunity to look at the insights of a social media content moderation team. We see how content moderation and shadow banning of accounts work. We see how the collaboration with governments was done. The main question should not be, did we agree with the content that was removed, or do we like the people that were silenced. We know, a new owner can have different preferences and other governments can request to take down other content. We should rather ask ourselves, should a social media platform work this way? Do we need more transparency? What are the standards we should hold platforms accountable to? Will the coming Digital Services Act DSA create more transparency? Will the DSA offer an effective means of legal redress when such measures are being taken but not justified?
|- id="prop_65"
| 65'''*''' || not assigned yet || Rodica Ciochina || Council of Europe || Intergovernmental organisation || || || || || || || || || AI and Environment:  AI is improving the ways we live, work and solve problems. It can also help us fight climate change and protect the environment. The technology has the potential to accelerate global efforts to protect the environment and conserve resources by, for example, reducing energy emissions, CO2 removal, helping develop greener transportation networks, monitoring deforestation, managing natural hazards and predicting extreme weather conditions. With more than two-thirds of the world’s population predicted to live in urban spaces, AI could play a key role in improving spatial use, greening cities and managing energy in the near future. But it also comes at a cost to the planet, as AI is highly energy-consuming. To truly benefit from the technology’s potential to find solutions to environmental challenges, we also need a better understanding of AI’s growing carbon footprint.
| 65'''*''' || not assigned yet || Rodica Ciochina || Council of Europe || Intergovernmental organisation || || || || || || || || || AI and Environment:  AI is improving the ways we live, work and solve problems. It can also help us fight climate change and protect the environment. The technology has the potential to accelerate global efforts to protect the environment and conserve resources by, for example, reducing energy emissions, CO2 removal, helping develop greener transportation networks, monitoring deforestation, managing natural hazards and predicting extreme weather conditions. With more than two-thirds of the world’s population predicted to live in urban spaces, AI could play a key role in improving spatial use, greening cities and managing energy in the near future. But it also comes at a cost to the planet, as AI is highly energy-consuming. To truly benefit from the technology’s potential to find solutions to environmental challenges, we also need a better understanding of AI’s growing carbon footprint.
|}
|}


[[Category:2023]]
[[Category:2023]]

Revision as of 19:58, 25 January 2023

During the call for issues for EuroDIG we received 60 submissions in the period from 12 September till 31 December 2022. You can see the breakdown of proposals here and download the list of proposals as of 31 December 2022, 24:00 CET as pdf file. The list below is a rolling document where proposals will be added during the review period. Proposals marked with an asterisk * have been added after 31 Dec. 2022.

Categories are coloured as follows: (up to three categories per proposal could be selected)

 Access & literacy   Development of IG ecosystem   Human rights & data protection   Innovation and economic issues   Media & content   Cross cutting / other issues   Security and crime   Technical & operational issues 

You may sort the table by clicking at the head of the column. To restore the original sorting, just reload the page.