Meaningful human control of AI decisions – Pre 02 2019: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Consolidated programme 2019|'''Consolidated programme 2019 overview''']]<br /><br />
[[Consolidated programme 2019|'''Consolidated programme 2019 overview''']]<br /><br />
Title: <big>'''AI 360° – human-centered'''</big><br /><br />
Title: <big>'''Meaningful human control of AI decisions'''</big><br /><br />
Proposals assigned to this session: ID 56, 84, 146, 163, 164, 173 – [https://www.eurodig.org/fileadmin/user_upload/eurodig_The-Hague/statistik_proposals_all/proposals_for_2019_2018-12-04__01_final_web_IDs_ver1.pdf list of all proposals as pdf]<br /><br />
Proposals assigned to this session: ID 56, 84, 146, 163, 164, 173 – [https://www.eurodig.org/fileadmin/user_upload/eurodig_The-Hague/statistik_proposals_all/proposals_for_2019_2018-12-04__01_final_web_IDs_ver1.pdf list of all proposals as pdf]<br /><br />
== <span class="dateline">Get involved!</span> ==  
== <span class="dateline">Get involved!</span> ==  
Line 6: Line 6:


== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
Until <span class="dateline">15 April 2019</span>.
When AI takes over, how can we, as humans, stay in control? How can we ensure that artificial intelligence is open to human intervention? Which decisions might be made by artificial intelligence and which definitely not?


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  
Until <span class="dateline">30 April 2019</span>.
Artificial intelligence has huge economic and social potential. As a consequence the technology is used more and more throughout various sectors. This varies from algorithms that decide which news items you are presented on the websites you visit to algorithms which support doctors and judges with their diagnoses and verdicts. In the future ever more decisions will be made or influenced by algorithms. Because of this, many questions arise. Such as: How do we, as humans, stay in control? How can we ensure that artificial intelligence is open to human intervention? Which decisions should be made by artificial intelligence and which not? The answers are crucial for the trust in artificial intelligence by society.  
 
Always use your own words to describe your session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.


== Format ==  
== Format ==  
Until <span class="dateline">30 April 2019</span>.
The first half of the session, the speakers will provide their insights into the issue. After that, the moderator will open up the floor for a lively discussion.
 
Pre-events should give the opportunity to create synergies with 3 rd parties i.e. Dynamic Coalitions, Partners. No session principles apply. They are held on day zero in parallel to setting up the venue for EuroDIG. We provide limited technical support.
 
Let us know here what you want to do.
 
== Further reading ==
Until <span class="dateline">30 April 2019</span>.
 
Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. Example for an external link: [http://www.eurodig.org/ Main page of EuroDIG]


== People ==  
== People ==  

Revision as of 10:31, 28 May 2019

Consolidated programme 2019 overview

Title: Meaningful human control of AI decisions

Proposals assigned to this session: ID 56, 84, 146, 163, 164, 173 – list of all proposals as pdf

You are invited to become a member of the session Org Team! By joining an Org Team you agree to that your name and affiliation will be published at the respective wiki page of the session for transparency reasons. Please subscribe to the session mailing list and answer the email that will be send to you requesting your confirmation of subscription.

Session teaser

When AI takes over, how can we, as humans, stay in control? How can we ensure that artificial intelligence is open to human intervention? Which decisions might be made by artificial intelligence and which definitely not?

Session description

Artificial intelligence has huge economic and social potential. As a consequence the technology is used more and more throughout various sectors. This varies from algorithms that decide which news items you are presented on the websites you visit to algorithms which support doctors and judges with their diagnoses and verdicts. In the future ever more decisions will be made or influenced by algorithms. Because of this, many questions arise. Such as: How do we, as humans, stay in control? How can we ensure that artificial intelligence is open to human intervention? Which decisions should be made by artificial intelligence and which not? The answers are crucial for the trust in artificial intelligence by society.

Format

The first half of the session, the speakers will provide their insights into the issue. After that, the moderator will open up the floor for a lively discussion.

People

Until .

Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.

Focal Point

  • Daphne Salvino

Organising Team (Org Team) List them here as they sign up.

  • Amali De Silva-Mitchell
  • Artemia-Dimitra Korovesi

Key Participants

Key Participants are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session – not necessarily on stage. Key Participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. They will be selected and assigned by the Org Team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance. Please provide short CV’s of the Key Participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.

Moderator

The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers. Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.