Meaningful human control of AI decisions – Pre 02 2019: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
18 June 2019 | 12:00-14:00 | EVEREST 1 & 2<br />
[[Consolidated programme 2019|'''Consolidated programme 2019 overview''']]<br /><br />
[[Consolidated programme 2019|'''Consolidated programme 2019 overview''']]<br /><br />
{{Sessionadvice-Pre-2019}}
Proposals assigned to this session: ID 56, 84, 146, 163, 164, 173 – [https://eurodigwiki.org/mw/images/d/de/Proposals_for_2019_2018-12-04_01_final_web_IDs_ver1.pdf list of all proposals as pdf]<br /><br />
Working title: <big>'''AI 360°'''</big><br /><br />
== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
Until <span class="dateline">15 April 2019</span>.
When AI takes over, how can we, as humans, stay in control? How can we ensure that artificial intelligence is open to human intervention? Which decisions might be made by artificial intelligence and which definitely not?


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  
Until <span class="dateline">30 April 2019</span>.
Artificial intelligence has huge economic and social potential. As a consequence the technology is used more and more throughout various sectors. This varies from algorithms that decide which news items you are presented on the websites you visit to algorithms which support doctors and judges with their diagnoses and verdicts. In the future ever more decisions will be made or influenced by algorithms. Because of this, many questions arise. Such as: How do we, as humans, stay in control? How can we ensure that artificial intelligence is open to human intervention? Which decisions should be made by artificial intelligence and which not? The answers are crucial for the trust in artificial intelligence by society.  
 
Always use your own words to describe your session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.


== Format ==  
== Format ==  
Until <span class="dateline">30 April 2019</span>.
The first half of the session, the speakers will provide their insights into the issue. After that, the moderator will open up the floor for a lively discussion.


Pre-events should give the opportunity to create synergies with 3 rd parties i.e. Dynamic Coalitions, Partners. No session principles apply. They are held on day zero in parallel to setting up the venue for EuroDIG. We provide limited technical support.
== People ==
'''Focal Point'''
*Daphne Salvino


Let us know here what you want to do.
'''Organising Team (Org Team)''' ''List them here as they sign up.''
*Amali De Silva-Mitchell
*Artemia-Dimitra Korovesi
*Stefania Grottola


== Further reading ==
'''Key Participants'''
Until <span class="dateline">30 April 2019</span>.
*Valerie Frissen, Professor Digital Technologies and Social Change at Leiden University, CEO at SIDN fund
 
*Tin Geber, Social Innovation Specialist at Hivos
Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. Example for an external link: [http://www.eurodig.org/ Main page of EuroDIG]
*Linnet Taylor, Associate Professor at Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society (TILT)
 
== People ==
Until <span class="dateline">15 May 2019</span>: Key participants


Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.
'''Moderator'''
*Mieke van Heesewijk, Program manager at SIDN Fund


Example for a list:
==Report==
*Person 1
Find an independent report of the session from the Geneva Internet Platform Digital Watch Observatory at https://dig.watch/sessions/meaningful-human-control-ai-decisions.
*Person 2


[[Category:2019]][[Category:Sessions 2019]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Side events 2019]]
[[Category:2019]][[Category:Sessions 2019]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Side events 2019]][[Category:Cross cutting/other issues 2019]]

Latest revision as of 16:52, 4 December 2020

18 June 2019 | 12:00-14:00 | EVEREST 1 & 2
Consolidated programme 2019 overview

Proposals assigned to this session: ID 56, 84, 146, 163, 164, 173 – list of all proposals as pdf

Session teaser

When AI takes over, how can we, as humans, stay in control? How can we ensure that artificial intelligence is open to human intervention? Which decisions might be made by artificial intelligence and which definitely not?

Session description

Artificial intelligence has huge economic and social potential. As a consequence the technology is used more and more throughout various sectors. This varies from algorithms that decide which news items you are presented on the websites you visit to algorithms which support doctors and judges with their diagnoses and verdicts. In the future ever more decisions will be made or influenced by algorithms. Because of this, many questions arise. Such as: How do we, as humans, stay in control? How can we ensure that artificial intelligence is open to human intervention? Which decisions should be made by artificial intelligence and which not? The answers are crucial for the trust in artificial intelligence by society.

Format

The first half of the session, the speakers will provide their insights into the issue. After that, the moderator will open up the floor for a lively discussion.

People

Focal Point

  • Daphne Salvino

Organising Team (Org Team) List them here as they sign up.

  • Amali De Silva-Mitchell
  • Artemia-Dimitra Korovesi
  • Stefania Grottola

Key Participants

  • Valerie Frissen, Professor Digital Technologies and Social Change at Leiden University, CEO at SIDN fund
  • Tin Geber, Social Innovation Specialist at Hivos
  • Linnet Taylor, Associate Professor at Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society (TILT)

Moderator

  • Mieke van Heesewijk, Program manager at SIDN Fund

Report

Find an independent report of the session from the Geneva Internet Platform Digital Watch Observatory at https://dig.watch/sessions/meaningful-human-control-ai-decisions.