How do transnational data flows affect users’ trust? – PL 1 Part 2 2016: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " ---- '''Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide...")
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
'''Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.'''
'''Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.'''
----
----
''To follow the current discussion on this topic, see [http://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Plenary_1._Innovation_and_economic_development the discussion tab] on the upper left side of this page''
''To follow the current discussion on this topic, see [http://eurodigwiki.org//index.php?title=Talk:PL_1_:_How_do_Transnational_Data_Flows_affect_Users%E2%80%99_Trust%3F&action=edit&redlink=1 the discussion tab] on the upper left side of this page''
 
'''Final title of the session:
 
Will Users' Trust impact on Transnational Data Flows?
 
Afternoon: How do Transnational Data Flows affect Users’ Trust?


== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
This session will explore the socio-economic effects of algorithmic decision making and discuss implications for policy making.
We take up the discussion where the morning session ended and re-visit the more controversial issues.  
 
[Open discussion format – NO Panelists!]
Afternoon: We take up the discussion where the morning session ended and re-visit the more controversial issues. [Open discussion format – NO Panelists!]


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  
'''Until 30 April 2016.''' Always use your own words to describe your session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.
We continue the discussion started in the morning session [[http://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/PL_1_Part_1:_Will_users%27_trust_impact_on_transnational_data_flows%3F]]and dive deeper into the more controversial issues.


== Keywords ==
== Keywords ==
Line 23: Line 16:


== Format ==  
== Format ==  
'''Until 30 April 2016.''' Please try new interactive formats out. EuroDIG is about dialogue not about statements.
''Please try new interactive formats out. EuroDIG is about dialogue not about statements.''


== Further reading ==  
== Further reading ==  
'''Until 30 April 2016.''' Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, only links to external resources are possible.
''Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, only links to external resources are possible.''


== People ==  
== People ==  
*'''Focal Point'''  
*'''Focal Point''': Thomas Grob, Deutsche Telekom AG, Germany/Switzerland
Thomas Grob, Deutsche Telekom AG, Germany/Switzerland
*'''Key participants''': Everyone interested in continuing the discussion.
 
*'''Moderator''': Frederic Donck (ISOC)
*'''Key participants'''
*'''Remote moderator''': Allon Bar
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
Key participants (workshop) are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session – not necessarily on stage. Key participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Panellist (plenary) will be selected and assigned by the org team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance.
Panellists should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session.
Please provide short CV’s of the participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
 
*'''Moderator'''
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers.
*Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
 
*'''Remote moderator'''
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
The remote moderator is in charge of facilitating participation via digital channels such as WebEx and social medial (Twitter, facebook). Remote moderators monitor and moderate the social media channels and the participants via WebEX and forward questions to the session moderator.
Please contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a remote moderator.
 
*'''Org team'''  
*'''Org team'''  
** Ana Kakalashvili, GIZ GmbH, Georgia/Germany
:* Ana Kakalashvili, GIZ GmbH, Georgia/Germany
** Marco Pancini, Google, Belgium
:* Marco Pancini, Google, Belgium
** Frédéric Donck, ISOC, Belgium
:* Frédéric Donck, ISOC, Belgium
** Karen McCabe, IEEE, USA
:* Karen McCabe, IEEE, USA
** Justin Caso, IEEE, USA
:* Justin Caso, IEEE, USA
 
*'''Reporter''': Thomas Grob (Deutsche Telekom AG)
*'''Reporter'''
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
The reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:  
#are summarised on a slide and  presented to the audience at the end of each session
#relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
#are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
#are in (rough) consensus with the audience
#are to be submitted to the secretariat within 48 hours after the session took place
Please provide short CV of the reporter of your session at the Wiki or link to another source and contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a reporter.


== Current discussion ==
== Current discussion ==
See [http://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Plenary_1._Innovation_and_economic_development the discussion tab] on the upper left side of this page.
See [http://eurodigwiki.org//index.php?title=Talk:PL_1_:_How_do_Transnational_Data_Flows_affect_Users%E2%80%99_Trust%3F&action=edit&redlink=1 the discussion tab] on the upper left side of this page.


== Conference call. Schedules and minutes ==
== Conference call. Schedules and minutes ==
Line 77: Line 46:
Contact: pl1@eurodig.org
Contact: pl1@eurodig.org


== Remote participation ==
== Video Record ==
 
[https://youtu.be/CMREoV5xIL4 See the video record in our youtube channel]


== Final report ==   
== Transcript ==
Deadline 2016
[[Transcript: How do transnational data flows affect users’ trust?]]
== Messages ==   
* There is no trade-off between Privacy & Security
* Security needs to be a collaborative effort / Subsidiarity works: intervene at the least intrusive level possible!
* The multistakeholder model offers the tools to solve complex issues – approach needs to be open, transparent, inclusive, accountable – needs active engagement; we need to do more!
* Transparency and Openness are meaningless, if people do not understand what is being disclosed or in case there is no alternative option.
* Openness requires shared responsibility: companies and governments may not solely and completely be held responsible for what people do online.


== Session twitter hashtag ==   
== Session twitter hashtag ==   
Hashtag:
Hashtag: #eurodig16 #trust


[[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Sessions 2016]][[Category:Innovation and economic development 2016]][[Category:Innovation and economic development]]
[[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Sessions 2016]][[Category:Innovation and economic development 2016]][[Category:Innovation and economic development]]

Revision as of 08:36, 20 July 2016


Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.


To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page

Session teaser

We take up the discussion where the morning session ended and re-visit the more controversial issues. [Open discussion format – NO Panelists!]

Session description

We continue the discussion started in the morning session [[1]]and dive deeper into the more controversial issues.

Keywords

Big Data, Transnational Data Flows, International agreements, data-related technologies, algorithmic technology and decision making, artificial intelligence, privacy, security, user trust, innovation, European economic divide

Format

Please try new interactive formats out. EuroDIG is about dialogue not about statements.

Further reading

Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, only links to external resources are possible.

People

  • Focal Point: Thomas Grob, Deutsche Telekom AG, Germany/Switzerland
  • Key participants: Everyone interested in continuing the discussion.
  • Moderator: Frederic Donck (ISOC)
  • Remote moderator: Allon Bar
  • Org team
  • Ana Kakalashvili, GIZ GmbH, Georgia/Germany
  • Marco Pancini, Google, Belgium
  • Frédéric Donck, ISOC, Belgium
  • Karen McCabe, IEEE, USA
  • Justin Caso, IEEE, USA
  • Reporter: Thomas Grob (Deutsche Telekom AG)

Current discussion

See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page.

Conference call. Schedules and minutes

  • dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
  • short summary of calls or email exchange
  • be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you
  • use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize and publish the discussion process

Mailing list

Contact: pl1@eurodig.org

Video Record

See the video record in our youtube channel

Transcript

Transcript: How do transnational data flows affect users’ trust?

Messages

  • There is no trade-off between Privacy & Security
  • Security needs to be a collaborative effort / Subsidiarity works: intervene at the least intrusive level possible!
  • The multistakeholder model offers the tools to solve complex issues – approach needs to be open, transparent, inclusive, accountable – needs active engagement; we need to do more!
  • Transparency and Openness are meaningless, if people do not understand what is being disclosed or in case there is no alternative option.
  • Openness requires shared responsibility: companies and governments may not solely and completely be held responsible for what people do online.

Session twitter hashtag

Hashtag: #eurodig16 #trust