IoT – A sustainable way forward – PL 02 2016: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(21 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
----
----
''To follow the current discussion on this topic, see [http://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Plenary_3:_Human_rights_and_the_digital_economy the discussion tab] on the upper left side of this page''
''To follow the current discussion on this topic, see [http://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Plenary_3:_Human_rights_and_the_digital_economy the discussion tab] on the upper left side of this page''
'''Final title of the session:  Happy with the Internet of Things?


== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
Line 25: Line 23:
Following this, two short keynotes will inform the discussion:
Following this, two short keynotes will inform the discussion:


1- Progressing IoT in a broad societal coalition: European Commission/AIOTI initiative;
# Progressing IoT in a broad societal coalition: European Commission/AIOTI initiative;
 
# Putting privacy and data protection in perspective: European Data Privacy Officer for progressing IoT in a responsible way, in the context of the GDPR and privacy shield.
2- Putting privacy and data protection in perspective: European Data Privacy Officer for progressing IoT in a responsible way, in the context of the GDPR and privacy shield.


After this, there will be a moderated discussion in which all participants can take part. The moderators switches between the audience and the "multistakeholder panel" as appropriate. The session will be closed with a preliminary conclusion by the moderators
After this, there will be a moderated discussion in which all participants can take part. The moderators switches between the audience and the "multistakeholder panel" as appropriate. The session will be closed with a preliminary conclusion by the moderators
Line 41: Line 38:


== People ==  
== People ==  
Name, institution, country of residence
*'''Focal Point''': ID 4 - Maarten Botterman, Chair of the Dynamic Coalition IoT
*'''Focal Point'''  
ID 4 - Maarten Botterman, Chair of the Dynamic Coalition IoT
*'''Key participants'''
*'''Key participants'''
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
:* Wojciech Wiewiórowski, Assistant EDPS
Key participants (workshop) are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session – not necessarily on stage. Key participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Panellist (plenary) will be selected and assigned by the org team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance.
:* Mario Campolargo, Director for Net Futures, European Commission DG CONNECT
Panellists should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session.
:* Maria Farrell, Senior Consultant, Interconnect Communications
Please provide short CV’s of the participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
:* Paul Rendek, Director of External Relations, RIPE NCC
*'''Moderator'''
:* Robert McDougall, Vodafone Head of Enterprise Public Policy; Chair of the AIOTI Policy Working Group (WG4)
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
*'''Moderator''': Maarten Botterman, Independent Strategic Advisor, GNKS Consult
The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers.
*'''Remote moderator''': André Melancia, Microsoft Certified Trainer / Developer / DBA
*Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
*'''Remote moderator'''
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''  
The remote moderator is in charge of facilitating participation via digital channels such as WebEx and social medial (Twitter, facebook). Remote moderators monitor and moderate the social media channels and the participants via WebEX and forward questions to the session moderator.
Please contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a remote moderator.
*'''Org team'''  
*'''Org team'''  
**ID 61, 64, 65 - Karen McCabe and Justin Caseo, IEEE
**ID 61, 64, 65 - Karen McCabe and Justin Caseo, IEEE
**ID 80 - Stacie Walsh, InterConnect Communications
**ID 80 - Stacie Walsh, InterConnect Communications
**ID 98 – Chris Buckridge, RIPE NCC
**ID 98 – Chris Buckridge, RIPE NCC
*'''Reporter'''
**ID    - Lee Hibbard, Peter Kimpian and Sophie KWASNY, Council of Europe
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
*'''Reporter''': Avri Doria
The reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:  
#are summarised on a slide and  presented to the audience at the end of each session
#relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
#are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
#are in (rough) consensus with the audience
#are to be submitted to the secretariat within 48 hours after the session took place
Please provide short CV of the reporter of your session at the Wiki or link to another source and contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a reporter.


== Current discussion ==
== Current discussion ==
Line 83: Line 66:
Contact: pl2@eurodig.org  
Contact: pl2@eurodig.org  


== Remote participation ==
== Video record ==
[https://youtu.be/AmMjqLLLfQw See the video record in our youtube channel]
 
== Transcript ==
[[Transcript: A sustainable way forward]]
 
== Messages == 
What if maybe not 10 years from now but 15 years from now, our environments are fully IOT enabled?  And they're not only observing us but also doing things for us, and learning how to take care of us.  They're learning what is best for us.  What would such an environment be like?  Do we need a law of ethics for the learning IOT networks for the future?
 
*IOT needs to be open and interoperable safe and reliable - easier for developers
 
*Law is not enough to protect and is not the main factor. Regulation is important, but most important is an ethical approach from the design phase onwards and the development of technical tools to deal with complexity in protecting privacy.
 
*Transformational capacity of IOT recognized by all.  But it needs to be trusted.
 
*As with all the wonderful things it carries a negative side. Life unobserved is going to disappear. The existing privacy rules are inadequate,
 
*We have to consider that IOT is just part of the continuum of the Internet growing and not the disruption some see.
 
*It was questioned whether IOT technology and policy are being done in an open, and transparent and inclusive manner?
 
*Will IOT have a dehumanizing effect. If so, how can this be mitigated
 
*How do we bring the multistakeholder model of participatory democracy to bear on IOT.  Many partnerships still ignore civil society.  How can civil society be brought into the discussion, brought into the balance?
 
*Will people be able to define how they interact with new technology.  Can they pick and choose? What choices with people have?


*IOT is moving out of the experimental stage into production. This creates new responsibilities.


== Final report == 
*How do we avoid the dystopic aspects of a world with IOT?
Deadline 2016


== Session twitter hashtag ==   
== Session twitter hashtag ==   
Hashtag:
Hashtag: #eurodig16 #iot-sustainable


[[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Sessions 2016]][[Category:Human rights 2016]][[Category:Human rights]]
[[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Sessions 2016]][[Category:Human rights 2016]][[Category:Human rights]][[Category:Internet of things]][[Category:Internet of things 2016]][[Category:Data protection]][[Category:Data protection 2016]][[Category:privacy]][[Category:privacy 2016]][[Category:Algorithms]][[Category:Algorithms 2016]][[Category:Big Data]][[Category:Big Data 2016]]

Revision as of 16:01, 20 July 2016


Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.


To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page

Session teaser

The Growing Internet of (Your) Things: from sensors to security

Session description

The Internet of Things is rapidly developing, primarily driven by businesses that see opportunities for profit through new business and business models. But other key players also include public administrations and non-profit institutions that see the IoT as an opportunity to address societal challenges in efficient ways that were not available before.

Evolution from machine to machine technology to the growing IoT networks raises challenges at every level that can become barriers to adoption when not addressed. New masses of data are generated by our things and then shared between objects. Smart algorithms can combine this information but also changes the meaning of privacy and security. Ignoring security and standardization threatens the longevity of IoT products.

The IoT has become a real game changer. How do we adapt to this new reality? What is needed most in order to create an environment that fosters positive evolution of the IoT, allowing us as businesses and society to benefit fully? And what role is there for the different stakeholders?

Keywords

Internet of Things; IoT; ethical; multistakeholder; dignity; fair use; ethical by design; privacy; GDPR

Format

The stage will be set with a short overview of the results of the dialogue on IoT during the 10th IGF in Joao Pessoa, November 2015. Following this, representatives of key stakeholder groups ("multistakeholder panel") will highlight in short statements (<5 minutes) how they feel about where we are, today, and what needs to happen, next, in order to ensure a healthy progress of IoT development and deployment in the world.

Following this, two short keynotes will inform the discussion:

  1. Progressing IoT in a broad societal coalition: European Commission/AIOTI initiative;
  2. Putting privacy and data protection in perspective: European Data Privacy Officer for progressing IoT in a responsible way, in the context of the GDPR and privacy shield.

After this, there will be a moderated discussion in which all participants can take part. The moderators switches between the audience and the "multistakeholder panel" as appropriate. The session will be closed with a preliminary conclusion by the moderators

Further reading

People

  • Focal Point: ID 4 - Maarten Botterman, Chair of the Dynamic Coalition IoT
  • Key participants
  • Wojciech Wiewiórowski, Assistant EDPS
  • Mario Campolargo, Director for Net Futures, European Commission DG CONNECT
  • Maria Farrell, Senior Consultant, Interconnect Communications
  • Paul Rendek, Director of External Relations, RIPE NCC
  • Robert McDougall, Vodafone Head of Enterprise Public Policy; Chair of the AIOTI Policy Working Group (WG4)
  • Moderator: Maarten Botterman, Independent Strategic Advisor, GNKS Consult
  • Remote moderator: André Melancia, Microsoft Certified Trainer / Developer / DBA
  • Org team
    • ID 61, 64, 65 - Karen McCabe and Justin Caseo, IEEE
    • ID 80 - Stacie Walsh, InterConnect Communications
    • ID 98 – Chris Buckridge, RIPE NCC
    • ID - Lee Hibbard, Peter Kimpian and Sophie KWASNY, Council of Europe
  • Reporter: Avri Doria

Current discussion

See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page.

Conference call. Schedules and minutes

  • dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
  • short summary of calls or email exchange
  • be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you
  • use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize and publish the discussion process

Mailing list

Contact: pl2@eurodig.org

Video record

See the video record in our youtube channel

Transcript

Transcript: A sustainable way forward

Messages

What if maybe not 10 years from now but 15 years from now, our environments are fully IOT enabled? And they're not only observing us but also doing things for us, and learning how to take care of us. They're learning what is best for us. What would such an environment be like? Do we need a law of ethics for the learning IOT networks for the future?

  • IOT needs to be open and interoperable safe and reliable - easier for developers
  • Law is not enough to protect and is not the main factor. Regulation is important, but most important is an ethical approach from the design phase onwards and the development of technical tools to deal with complexity in protecting privacy.
  • Transformational capacity of IOT recognized by all. But it needs to be trusted.
  • As with all the wonderful things it carries a negative side. Life unobserved is going to disappear. The existing privacy rules are inadequate,
  • We have to consider that IOT is just part of the continuum of the Internet growing and not the disruption some see.
  • It was questioned whether IOT technology and policy are being done in an open, and transparent and inclusive manner?
  • Will IOT have a dehumanizing effect. If so, how can this be mitigated
  • How do we bring the multistakeholder model of participatory democracy to bear on IOT. Many partnerships still ignore civil society. How can civil society be brought into the discussion, brought into the balance?
  • Will people be able to define how they interact with new technology. Can they pick and choose? What choices with people have?
  • IOT is moving out of the experimental stage into production. This creates new responsibilities.
  • How do we avoid the dystopic aspects of a world with IOT?

Session twitter hashtag

Hashtag: #eurodig16 #iot-sustainable