From cybersecurity to terrorism – are we all under surveillance? – PL 03a 2016: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
Panellists should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session.
Panellists should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session.
Please provide short CV’s of the participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.  
Please provide short CV’s of the participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.  
*'''Moderator'''
*'''Moderator''': Jens Jeppesen
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers.
*Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
*'''Remote moderator''': Farzaneh Badiei  
*'''Remote moderator''': Farzaneh Badiei  
*'''Org team'''  
*'''Org team'''  
Line 39: Line 36:
**Rudi Vansnick
**Rudi Vansnick
**Lianna Galstyan
**Lianna Galstyan
*'''Reporter'''
*'''Reporter''': Valentina Pavel
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
The reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:  
#are summarised on a slide and  presented to the audience at the end of each session
#relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
#are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
#are in (rough) consensus with the audience
#are to be submitted to the secretariat within 48 hours after the session took place
Please provide short CV of the reporter of your session at the Wiki or link to another source and contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a reporter.


== Current discussion ==
== Current discussion ==

Revision as of 12:26, 27 May 2016


Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.


To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page

Session teaser

This session will be an interactive discussion with short interventions from speakers on the stage and in the audience on the topics of government surveillance, cybersecurity, terrorism and anonymity.

Session description

Recent cyber and terrorist attacks have led several European governments to consider and enact new online surveillance laws, e.g. in France and the UK. This will be a solutions-focused session seeking to find multi-stakeholder answers to key questions such as: What are the features of these new laws and are they legal? Do they hinder terrorism? What is the impact on anonymity and privacy? What actions do tech companies take to increase trusts, e.g. through encryption and transparency? What is the right balance between fighting terrorism and upholding online rights? How can we bring a human rights framing to security and surveillance discussions and policy-making?

Keywords

Surveillance, terrorism, anonymity

Format

Moving from statements to Q&A. A very brief “state of play” comments for each of the questions outlined from the speakers, followed by suggestions or thoughts from the speakers on how to address the challenges/how to change the discourse/how to shift the policy discussion, engaging also the audience in the discussion.

Further reading

Until 30 April 2016. Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, only links to external resources are possible.

People

  • Focal Point: Mattias Bjärnemalm, Advisor on Internet Policy, European Parliament
  • Key participants

Until 15 May 2016. Key participants (workshop) are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session – not necessarily on stage. Key participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Panellist (plenary) will be selected and assigned by the org team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance. Panellists should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Please provide short CV’s of the participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.

  • Moderator: Jens Jeppesen
  • Remote moderator: Farzaneh Badiei
  • Org team
    • Desara Dushi, PhD Candidate in Law, Science and Technology, University of Bologna and University of Turin
    • Christian Borggreen
    • Sophie Kwasny
    • Rudi Vansnick
    • Lianna Galstyan
  • Reporter: Valentina Pavel

Current discussion

See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page.

Conference call. Schedules and minutes

  • dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
  • short summary of calls or email exchange
  • be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you
  • use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize and publish the discussion process

Mailing list

Contact: pl3a@eurodig.org

Remote participation

Final report

Deadline 2016

Session twitter hashtag

Hashtag: