Internet fragmentation and digital sovereignty: implications for Europe – PL 04 2016: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(27 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
----
----
''To follow the current discussion on this topic, see [http://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Plenary_4:_Fragmentation the discussion tab] on the upper left side of this page''
''To follow the current discussion on this topic, see [http://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Plenary_4:_Fragmentation the discussion tab] on the upper left side of this page''
'''Final title of the session: please send the final title until 4 April to office@eurodig.org.''' Do not edit the title on your at the wiki. The link to your session may otherwise disappear.


== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
'''Until April 4th 2016.''' One sentence description
This plenary session will discuss Internet Fragmentation from both a technical and jurisdictional point of view, and highlight implications for Europe.


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  
'''Until 30 April 2016.''' Always use your own words to describe your session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.
This plenary will discuss what we mean by ‘Internet fragmentation’ and ‘digital sovereignty;’ what the social, political and economic costs of unintended fragmentation are; and what Europe should do to address this challenge.
Our traditional international system is based upon the notion of territorial sovereignty. Can we apply national jurisdiction on the Internet without re-aligning the cross-border network along geographic boundaries or extending jurisdiction extraterritoriality? Do we have the necessary legal tools and frameworks in place that a transnational Internet demands? In the European context, debates around Internet fragmentation and digital sovereignty increase in the context of the enforcement of the right to be de-indexed, privacy protection and data localization, as well as the Digital Single Market.


== Keywords ==
== Keywords ==
'''Until April 4th 2016.''' They will be used as hash tags for easy searching on the wiki
Internet Fragmentation, Digital Sovereignty, Technical Fragmentation, Jurisdiction, Standards, Unintended Consequences


== Format ==  
== Format ==  
'''Until 30 April 2016.''' Please try new interactive formats out. EuroDIG is about dialogue not about statements.
Interactive panel discussion


== Further reading ==  
== Further reading ==  
'''Until 30 April 2016.''' Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, only links to external resources are possible.
[http://www.internetjurisdiction.net/jurisdiction-on-the-internet-global-commission-on-internet-governance/ Jurisdiction on the Internet: From Legal Arms Race to Transnational Cooperation] by Bertrand de La Chapelle and Paul Fehlinger
 
[http://bit.ly/1ZPHVkn/ Internet Fragmentation: An Overview] by William J. Drake, Vinton G. Cerf, and Wolfgang Kleinwächter. Geneva: The World Economic Forum, January  2016.


== People ==  
== People ==  
Name, institution, country of residence
*'''Focal Point''': Paul Fehlinger, Internet & Jurisdiction Project, France
*'''Focal Point'''  
Focal points take over the responsibility and lead of the session organization. Focal points are kindly requested to observe [http://www.eurodig.org/get-involved/organising-a-session/#jfmulticontent_c2865-1 EuroDIG's session principles]. Focal points work in close contact and cooperation with the programme director.
*'''Key participants'''
*'''Key participants'''
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
:*Göran Marby, President and CEO, ICANN
Key participants (workshop) are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session – not necessarily on stage. Key participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Panellist (plenary) will be selected and assigned by the org team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance.
:*John Frank, Vice President, EU Government Affairs, Microsoft
Panellists should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session.
:*Roberto Viola, Director, DG Connect, European Commission
Please provide short CV’s of the participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
:*Elfa Ýr Gylfadóttir, Director, Icelandic Media Commission and Chair of the Council of Europe CDMSI
*'''Moderator'''
:*Marietje Schaake, Dutch Member of the European Parliament for D66/ALDE
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
*'''Moderators''': Paul Fehlinger, Co-Founder and Manager, Internet & Jurisdiction and Wolfgang Kleinwächter, Professor emeritus, Aarhus University
The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers.
*'''Remote moderator''': The remote moderator is in charge of facilitating participation via digital channels such as WebEx and social medial (Twitter, facebook). Remote moderators monitor and moderate the social media channels and the participants via WebEX and forward questions to the session moderator.  
*Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
*'''Remote moderator'''
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
The remote moderator is in charge of facilitating participation via digital channels such as WebEx and social medial (Twitter, facebook). Remote moderators monitor and moderate the social media channels and the participants via WebEX and forward questions to the session moderator.
Please contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a remote moderator.
*'''Org team'''  
*'''Org team'''  
Organising team is a group of people shaping the session. Every interested individual can become a member of an organising team (org team).
:*Dennis Broeders
*'''Reporter'''
:*Bill Drake
'''Until 15 May 2016.'''
:*Anja Gengo
The reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:  
:*Thomas Grob
#are summarised on a slide and  presented to the audience at the end of each session
:*Konstantinos Komaitis
#relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
:*Jovan Kurbalija
#are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
:*Milton Mueller
#are in (rough) consensus with the audience
:*Louis Pouzin
#are to be submitted to the secretariat within 48 hours after the session took place
:*Sorina Teleanu
Please provide short CV of the reporter of your session at the Wiki or link to another source and contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a reporter.
:*Wolfgang Kleinwächter
:*Andrea Beccalli
*'''Reporter''': Anja Gengo, Fellow, Internet Governance Forum


== Current discussion ==
== Current discussion ==
Line 63: Line 60:
Contact: pl4@eurodig.org
Contact: pl4@eurodig.org


== Remote participation ==
== Video record ==
[https://youtu.be/j8rcSKN0CD4 see the video record in our youtube channel]


== Transcript ==
[[Transcript: Internet fragmentation and digital sovereignty: implications for Europe]]


== Final report ==   
== Messages ==   
Deadline 2016
* All stakeholders have the responsibility toward the Internet and it is essential to work together, for the purposes of sustaining the future.
* The mechanisms on how to apply the rule of law online in a more horizontal manner should be developed in line with the principles of openness and universality of human rights.
* The stakeholders should aim for creating the digital single market without borders in order to overcome the fragmentation. More visions and ideas are needed.
* There is a need for good regulations. Within European institutions, there are recognised good practices that are in line with the most important human rights principles.
* Variations in laws, legal traditions, political systems and languages should not be perceived as fragmentation. The fragmentation should be discussed in a context of inability to connect end points.
* The need to negotiate needs to be developed on all levels. Cooperative sovereignty is needed so that we meet important social values, in a democratic process.
* We should work on models on how to extend trade to protect open Internet in line with connecting economic interests of nation states to an open Internet.


== Session twitter hashtag ==   
== Session twitter hashtag ==   
Hashtag:
Hashtag: #eurodig16


[[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Sessions 2016]][[Category:Participation in IG policy making 2016]][[Category:Participation in IG policy making]]
[[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Sessions 2016]][[Category:Participation in IG policy making 2016]][[Category:Participation in IG policy making]]

Revision as of 14:41, 24 July 2016


Please use your own words to describe this session. You may use external references, websites or publications as a source of information or inspiration, if you decide to quote them, please clearly specify the source.


To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page

Session teaser

This plenary session will discuss Internet Fragmentation from both a technical and jurisdictional point of view, and highlight implications for Europe.

Session description

This plenary will discuss what we mean by ‘Internet fragmentation’ and ‘digital sovereignty;’ what the social, political and economic costs of unintended fragmentation are; and what Europe should do to address this challenge.

Our traditional international system is based upon the notion of territorial sovereignty. Can we apply national jurisdiction on the Internet without re-aligning the cross-border network along geographic boundaries or extending jurisdiction extraterritoriality? Do we have the necessary legal tools and frameworks in place that a transnational Internet demands? In the European context, debates around Internet fragmentation and digital sovereignty increase in the context of the enforcement of the right to be de-indexed, privacy protection and data localization, as well as the Digital Single Market.

Keywords

Internet Fragmentation, Digital Sovereignty, Technical Fragmentation, Jurisdiction, Standards, Unintended Consequences

Format

Interactive panel discussion

Further reading

Jurisdiction on the Internet: From Legal Arms Race to Transnational Cooperation by Bertrand de La Chapelle and Paul Fehlinger

Internet Fragmentation: An Overview by William J. Drake, Vinton G. Cerf, and Wolfgang Kleinwächter. Geneva: The World Economic Forum, January 2016.

People

  • Focal Point: Paul Fehlinger, Internet & Jurisdiction Project, France
  • Key participants
  • Göran Marby, President and CEO, ICANN
  • John Frank, Vice President, EU Government Affairs, Microsoft
  • Roberto Viola, Director, DG Connect, European Commission
  • Elfa Ýr Gylfadóttir, Director, Icelandic Media Commission and Chair of the Council of Europe CDMSI
  • Marietje Schaake, Dutch Member of the European Parliament for D66/ALDE
  • Moderators: Paul Fehlinger, Co-Founder and Manager, Internet & Jurisdiction and Wolfgang Kleinwächter, Professor emeritus, Aarhus University
  • Remote moderator: The remote moderator is in charge of facilitating participation via digital channels such as WebEx and social medial (Twitter, facebook). Remote moderators monitor and moderate the social media channels and the participants via WebEX and forward questions to the session moderator.
  • Org team
  • Dennis Broeders
  • Bill Drake
  • Anja Gengo
  • Thomas Grob
  • Konstantinos Komaitis
  • Jovan Kurbalija
  • Milton Mueller
  • Louis Pouzin
  • Sorina Teleanu
  • Wolfgang Kleinwächter
  • Andrea Beccalli
  • Reporter: Anja Gengo, Fellow, Internet Governance Forum

Current discussion

See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page.

Conference call. Schedules and minutes

  • dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
  • short summary of calls or email exchange
  • be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you
  • use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize and publish the discussion process

Mailing list

Contact: pl4@eurodig.org

Video record

see the video record in our youtube channel

Transcript

Transcript: Internet fragmentation and digital sovereignty: implications for Europe

Messages

  • All stakeholders have the responsibility toward the Internet and it is essential to work together, for the purposes of sustaining the future.
  • The mechanisms on how to apply the rule of law online in a more horizontal manner should be developed in line with the principles of openness and universality of human rights.
  • The stakeholders should aim for creating the digital single market without borders in order to overcome the fragmentation. More visions and ideas are needed.
  • There is a need for good regulations. Within European institutions, there are recognised good practices that are in line with the most important human rights principles.
  • Variations in laws, legal traditions, political systems and languages should not be perceived as fragmentation. The fragmentation should be discussed in a context of inability to connect end points.
  • The need to negotiate needs to be developed on all levels. Cooperative sovereignty is needed so that we meet important social values, in a democratic process.
  • We should work on models on how to extend trade to protect open Internet in line with connecting economic interests of nation states to an open Internet.

Session twitter hashtag

Hashtag: #eurodig16