Stress testing the multistakeholder model in cybersecurity – WS 09 2017: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<big>'''Stress testing the multistakeholder model in cybersecurity'''</big> – WS 09 2017
[[Programme overview 2017]]
[[Programme overview 2017]]
<big>'''WS 9: Cybersecurity Governance'''</big>
{{Sessionadvice01}}
{{Sessionadvice01}}
== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==

Revision as of 18:40, 11 May 2017

Stress testing the multistakeholder model in cybersecurity – WS 09 2017

Programme overview 2017 Consolidated programme 2018 overview

To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page


Final title of the session: Please send the final title until latest to wiki@eurodig.org. Do not edit the title of the page at the wiki on your own. The link to your session may otherwise disappear.

Session teaser

Reality or wishful thinking: a new take on cybersecurity governance and multistakeholderism

Keywords

  1. collaborative security, #multistakeholderism, #relationship with the PPP model, #best and worst practices, #good practices, #cybersecurity governance model

Session description

This session will focus on multistakeholderism in cybersecurity governance and both the practical and policy tools to serve to that end. Further discussions to be held from this perspective on the collaborative security model as a different take on the multistakeholder approach.

Format

This session will not run in the traditional panel format, instead there will be two moderators on stage (and one remote moderator) and key participants as resource persons to actively engage the audience for a vibrant discussion.

Further reading

Internet Society Report on Collaborative Security (available at http://www.internetsociety.org/collaborativesecurity )

People

Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.

  • Focal Point: Frederick Donck (ISOC), Ceren Unal (ISOC)

Focal Points take over the responsibility and lead of the session organisation. Focal Points are kindly requested to observe EuroDIG's session principles. Focal Points work in close cooperation with the respective Subject Matter Expert (SME) and the EuroDIG Secretariat.

  • Subject Matter Expert (SME): Tatiana Tropina (Max Planck Institute)

SMEs are responsible for the clustering of submissions into a thematic category they have an expertise in. They define subtopics and identify submissions which fall under this subtopic. The aim is to verify submissions which can be merged in one session. In the course of the session organising process SMEs will serve as a mentor for the respective category by supporting all Focal Points.

  • Key Participants (for workshop) or Panellists (for plenary)

Until 15 May 2017. Key Participants (workshop) are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session – not necessarily on stage. Key Participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Panellist (plenary) will be selected and assigned by the org team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance. Panellists should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Please provide short CV’s of the Key Participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.

  • Moderator

Until 15 May 2017. The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers. Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.

  • Remote Moderator

Until 15 May 2017. The Remote Moderator is in charge of facilitating participation via digital channels such as WebEx and social medial (Twitter, facebook). Remote Moderators monitor and moderate the social media channels and the participants via WebEX and forward questions to the session moderator. Please contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a remote moderator.

  • Organising Team (Org Team)

Farzaneh Badiei (Badii)- Executive director at the Internet Governance Project, Georgia Tech Oriana Sula Fotjon Kosta

  • Reporter

Until 15 May 2017. The Reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:

  • are summarised on a slide and presented to the audience at the end of each session
  • relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
  • are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
  • are in (rough) consensus with the audience
  • are to be submitted to the secretariat within 48 hours after the session took place

Please provide short CV of the reporter of your session at the Wiki or link to another source and contact the EuroDIG secretariat if you need help to find a reporter.

Current discussion, conference calls, schedules and minutes

See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page. Please use this page to publish:

  • dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
  • short summary of calls or email exchange

Please be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you. Use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize the discussion process.


First call: March 23, 14.30 UTC (ISOC to set up the call) Minutes to be shared with this group and then with Eurodig Community on the wiki

Second Call: April 21, 14.30 UTC (ISOC to set up the call)

More will be published on the discussion tab soon.

Contact

Get in contact with the Org Team by sending an email.

Video record

Will be provided here after the event.

Transcript

Will be provided here after the event.

Messages

Please provide a short summary from the outcome of your session. Bullet points are fine.