Talk:Stress testing the multistakeholder model in cybersecurity – WS 09 2017

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

23. March 2017 - Call No. 1, minutes

Participants:

Focal Point: Frédéric Donck/Ceren Ünal (ISOC), SME: Tatiana Tropina, Farzaneh Badiei (Badii), Oriana Sula, Fotjon Kosta

Session description/Suggested titles:

  • Stress testing the multistakeholder model in cybersecurity
  • Does Cybersecurity fit with the MS model and how to test it?

Agreed Format for the session:

No panel. A roundtable, discussants and key participants(*) + 2 moderators (and a remote moderator) (*)key participants: selection of experts that shall be acting as resources for the moderator(s)

Further reading:

Internet Society: Collaborative Security

Summary:

  • Re: the content of the session, a consensus was reached on focusing on multistakeholderism in cybersecurity governance and both the practical and policy tools to serve to that end.
  • Potential key words and topics for discussion: “collaborative security” approach, analyzing different models of multistakeholderism, relationship with the PPP model, different levels of multistakeholderism (policy making/execution), multistakeholder IG in general and specific multistakeholder cybersecurity governance, concrete real life examples (i.e. 2016 October DdoS attack against Dyn), best and worst practices, position of governments on a multistakeholder cybersecurity governance model.
  • RE: the session format, agreement not to go with the traditional panel format in order to spark interest and engage the audience in the discussion - Format suggestions: no panel on stage, instead 2/3 moderators: “key participants” as key resources for the moderators as they see fit during the conversation

ACTIONS:

1. Define Sessions teasers and keywords by April 1 (and up-date wiki accordingly)

  • (Draft) Session teaser : «Turning crises into opportunity : a new take on cybersecurity governance and multistakeholderism»
  • (Draft) Keywords: #collaborative security, #multistakeholderism, #relationship with the PPP model, #best and worst practices, #cybersecurity governance model

2. Each Member of the Org Team to prepare and present a list of potential “key participants” for this session as well as potential moderators/remote moderator/reporter. Deadline: next call on 21 April 14:30 UTC

3. Next Meeting of the Org.Team: April 21, 14.30 UTC (ISOC to share the data for the call in due course)


Call No. 2, minutes

Participants:

Focal Point: Ceren Ünal (ISOC), SME: Tatiana Tropina (Max Planck Institute), Farzaneh Badii (Internet Governance Project, Georgia Tech.), Fotjon Kosta (Albanian Ministry of Energy and Industry)

Call summary:

With the consensus of the participants, session info has been finalized as follows:

Session Title: Stress testing the multistakeholder model in cybersecurity

Session Description: This session will focus on multistakeholderism in cybersecurity governance and both the practical and policy tools to serve to that end. Further discussions to be held from this perspective on the collaborative security model as a different take on the multistakeholder approach.

Session Teaser: Reality or wishful thinking: a new take on cybersecurity governance and multistakeholderism

Keywords: collaborative security, multistakeholderism, relationship with the PPP model, best and worst practices, good practices, cybersecurity governance model

Session Format: This session will not run in the traditional panel format, instead there will be two moderators on stage (and one remote moderator) and key participants as resource persons to actively engage the audience for a vibrant discussion.

Further reading: /Internet Society Report on Collaborative Security

A consensus has been reached on the following names as moderators/key participants/reporter:

Moderators:

  • Sally Shipman Wentworth (ISOC) (TBC)
  • Tatiana Tropina (Max Planck Institute)

Remote Moderator:

  • Fotjon Costa (Albanian Ministry of Energy and Industry)

Key Participants:

  • George Christou (University of Warwick) (TBC)
  • Patrik Fältström (TBC)
  • Marina Kaljurand (or Eneken Tikk) (Estonian Government) (TBC)
  • Robin Wilton (ISOC) (TBC)
  • Milton Mueller (Georgia Tech) (TBC)
  • Business Representative (Name to be confirmed)

Reporter:

  • Ceren Unal (ISOC)

ACTIONS:

1. Session info to be updated on the EURODIG Wiki by 30 April 2017

2. Each Member of the Org Team to check the availability of the proposed moderators and key participants and update the confirmation status of the proposed names respectively on the google.docs file

3. Next Meeting of the Org Team: Second week of May (Date to be confirmed, ISOC to share the data for the call in due course)

Retrieved from "https://eurodigwiki.org/mw/index.php?title=Talk:Stress_testing_the_multistakeholder_model_in_cybersecurity_–_WS_09_2017&oldid=9075"