Steering Committee meeting for joint EU / CoE Cybercrime@EAP II and Cybercrime@EAP III projects – Pre 06 2017: Difference between revisions
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
'''The Steering Committee meeting aims to critically assess the performance against project objectives, identify the major gaps that could be addressed until the end of the project, and re-engage project teams and partners into discussion about the future activities that could take advantage of the expected project achievements'''. | '''The Steering Committee meeting aims to critically assess the performance against project objectives, identify the major gaps that could be addressed until the end of the project, and re-engage project teams and partners into discussion about the future activities that could take advantage of the expected project achievements'''. | ||
* Opening session; | |||
* Progress under Cybercrime@EAP projects; | |||
* Discussion on outputs under Cybercrime@EAP projects; | |||
* Proposal for Cybercrime@EAP projects’ extension in 2018. | |||
== Format == | == Format == | ||
Revision as of 14:38, 15 May 2017
Steering Committee meeting for joint EU / CoE Cybercrime@EAP II and Cybercrime@EAP III projects – closed meeting – Pre 06 2017
Programme overview 2017 Consolidated programme 2018 overview
To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page
Final title of the session: Please send the final title until 15 April 2018 latest to wiki@eurodig.org. Do not edit the title of the page at the wiki on your own. The link to your session may otherwise disappear.
Review of progress made and way forward for Cybercrime@EAP II and Cybercrime@EAP III projects
Keywords
Cybercrime, projects, EU, CoE, EAP, PGG, Partnership for Good Governance, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, C-PROC, Cybercrime Programme Office, electronic evidence, international cooperation, public/private cooperation
Session description
The Steering Committee meeting aims to critically assess the performance against project objectives, identify the major gaps that could be addressed until the end of the project, and re-engage project teams and partners into discussion about the future activities that could take advantage of the expected project achievements.
- Opening session;
- Progress under Cybercrime@EAP projects;
- Discussion on outputs under Cybercrime@EAP projects;
- Proposal for Cybercrime@EAP projects’ extension in 2018.
Format
Until 30 April 2017.
Further reading
Until 30 April 2017. Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. Example for an external link: Main page of EuroDIG
People
Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.
Messages
Please provide a short summary from the outcome of your session. Bullet points are fine.