Open session of the IGF Dynamic Coalition on the Internet of Things – Pre 02 2017: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Programme overview 2017 {{Sessionadvice01}} == Session teaser == '''Until 1 April 2017.''' == Keywords == '''Until 1 April 2017.''' They will be used as hash tags for eas...")
 
No edit summary
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Programme overview 2017]]
6 June 2017 | 11:00 - 14:00 | Room Tornimäe II, Swissotel, Tallinn, Estonia<br />
{{Sessionadvice01}}
[[Programme overview 2017|'''Programme overview 2017''']]<br /><br />
 
== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
'''Until 1 April 2017.'''
The Dynamic Coalition on the Internet of Things that was set up during the 2008 meeting of the Internet Governance Forum in Hyderabad aims to come to a global, multistakeholder understanding of “good practice” in the Internet of Things. This meeting is open to all that want to support the global dialogue in this, and we look forward to seeing you in Tallinn, or later this year in Washington (USA IGF) or Geneva (IGF2017).
 
Make a difference - show up!


== Keywords ==
== Keywords ==
'''Until 1 April 2017.''' They will be used as hash tags for easy searching on the wiki
IoT; IGF2017; Ethics; multistakeholder; security; privacy; safety


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  
'''Until 30 April 2017.'''
The Dynamic Coalition on the Internet of Things that was set up during the 2008 meeting of the Internet Governance Forum in Hyderabad aims to come to a global, multistakeholder understanding of “good practice” in the Internet of Things. A draft paper on global good practice and embraced the following Principle has been developed and adopted for further progress:
Always use your own words to describe your session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.
 
“Internet of Things Good Practice aims at developing loT systems, products, and services taking ethical considerations into account from the outset, both in the development, deployment and use phases of the life cycle, thus to find an ethical, sustainable way ahead using loT helping to create a free, secure and rights enabling based environment: a future we want, full with safe opportunities to embrace.”
 
It is our aim to further the multistakeholder dialogue over the coming year. We fully recognise that IoT is global, and that sustainable development (in the sense of the Brundtland definition: a balance of social, economic and environmental factors) can only be the result of an approach in which all stakeholders work together (multistakeholder approach) in an ethical way (ethical by design).
This needs to be championed on a global level, by all those committed to the Global good practice for IoT. For EuroDIG 2017, we ask for input in particular relating to the following calls for action:
 
1- The need to actively pursue clarity on what is legally allowed and/or what is crucial for responsible advancement of IoT, and what not, by developing a (global) taxonomy. We believe it would be important to develop a taxonomy on security sensitivity (need to secure access to IoT data and actuators); on privacy sensitivity (access and integrity of data that can be related to persons), and safety (potential impact of the IoT operations on human beings, for instance driverless cars, health regulators in the body, etc.).
a. Such clarity will make developers and deployers of IoT products and services more aware of requirements with regards to these aspects, whereas otherwise the danger is “time to market” will prevail to other considerations;
b. Such clarity will take away unnecessary hindrances of IoT developments in areas where there is no need for high attention to security, safety and/or privacy protection which will open the way to more rapid development and deployment;
 
2- The need to further empower the multistakeholder approach by raising awareness of the issues towards citizens, and ensure their perspective is taken into account.
In order to be able to truly develop IoT in a multistakeholder way, all stakeholders need to become aware of the stakes: not only industry and government, but also citizens. An active role towards providing balanced information regarding to IoT related developments would help ensure people step in to the discussion and development at the right time, rather than “wake up one day and realize what they missed – and what has become common practice.”
 
3- Consider future developments to “guide responsible development” by foresight, while choices are still possible.
Hand in hand with the increasing penetration of IoT devices in our societies, also the intelligence of devices and cyber physical systems (i.e. systems in which IoT devices jointly deliver an more or less autonomous service, such as a vehicle, and towards the future maybe even public and private spaces with automatic climate control and other services), it is foreseeable that artificial intelligence will become much higher than human intelligence at some point in the future. How do we ensure the IoT enabled environments that are managed by autonomous and developing (learning) intelligence will continue to serve us in healthy ways? It is important to consider the moral and ethical dimension in this prior to these practices becoming “normal”.
 
We will also explore possible other issues to be put on the agenda for IGF2017 for a further debate at global level in a multistakeholder way, such as <identifyers>, <unintended consequences awareness>, <dealing with vulnerabilities>, etc.
 
This meeting is open to all that want to support the global dialogue in this, and we look forward to seeing you in Tallinn, or later this year in Washington (USA IGF) or Geneva (IGF2017).
 
 
You can follow IGF DC IoT at the [http://www.iot-dynamic-coalition.org/ website] and/or subscribe to the  [http://intgovforum.org/mailman/options/dc_iot_intgovforum.org mailing list]


== Format ==  
== Format ==  
'''Until 30 April 2017.''' Please try out new interactive formats. EuroDIG is about dialogue not about statements, presentations and speeches. Workshops should not be organised as a small plenary.
This meeting is open to all participants. We will introduce the work of the IGF DC IoT and raise the questions as indicated in the summary of this session. The meeting will be moderated, and a report will be posted at the EuroDIG site and http://www.iot-dynamic-coalition.org/


== Further reading ==  
== Further reading ==  
'''Until 30 April 2017.''' Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible.
See http://www.iot-dynamic-coalition.org/
Example for an external link: [http://www.eurodig.org/ Main page of EuroDIG]


== People ==  
== People ==  
'''Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.'''
The meeting will be moderated by the Chairman of the IGF DC IoT, Maarten Botterman
*'''Focal Point'''
Focal Points take over the responsibility and lead of the session organisation. Focal Points are kindly requested to observe [http://www.eurodig.org/get-involved/organising-a-session/#jfmulticontent_c2865-1 EuroDIG's session principles]. Focal Points work in close cooperation with the respective Subject Matter Expert (SME) and the EuroDIG Secretariat.
*'''Key Participants (for workshop) or Panellists (for plenary)'''
'''Until 15 May 2017.''' Key Participants (workshop) are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session – not necessarily on stage. Key Participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Panellist (plenary) will be selected and assigned by the org team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance. Panellists should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session.
Please provide short CV’s of the Key Participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
*'''Moderator'''
'''Until 15 May 2017.'''
The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers.
Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
*'''Organising Team (Org Team)'''
'''As they sign up''' The Org Team is a group of people shaping the session. Org Teams are open and every interested individual can become a member.
*'''Reporter'''
'''Until 15 May 2017.''' The Reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:
*are summarised on a slide and  presented to the audience at the end of each session
*relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
*are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
*are in (rough) consensus with the audience
*are to be submitted to the secretariat within 48 hours after the session took place
Please provide short CV of the reporter of your session at the Wiki or link to another source and contact the [mailto:office@eurodig.org EuroDIG secretariat] if you need help to find a reporter.


== Current discussion, conference calls, schedules and minutes ==
Maarten Botterman is Director of ICANN, Chairman of the IGF Dynamic Coalition on the Internet of Things, and Chairman of the Supervisory Board of NLnet Foundation. As independent authority on future Internet and Internet Governance matters he combines insight in new technology potential with user interests to develop strategic opportunities for policy and businesses. He builds on experience as former Director at RAND Corporation (European Office), Scientific Officer European Commission, and Senior Advisor/Head of Unit at the Dutch Ministry of Transport. [mailto:maarten@gnksconsult.com Chairman IGF DC IoT]
See the [[{{TALKPAGENAME}} | discussion]] tab on the upper left side of this page. Please use this page to publish:
*dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
*short summary of calls or email exchange
Please be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you. Use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize the discussion process.


== Messages ==   
== Messages ==   

Latest revision as of 17:53, 4 December 2020

6 June 2017 | 11:00 - 14:00 | Room Tornimäe II, Swissotel, Tallinn, Estonia
Programme overview 2017

Session teaser

The Dynamic Coalition on the Internet of Things that was set up during the 2008 meeting of the Internet Governance Forum in Hyderabad aims to come to a global, multistakeholder understanding of “good practice” in the Internet of Things. This meeting is open to all that want to support the global dialogue in this, and we look forward to seeing you in Tallinn, or later this year in Washington (USA IGF) or Geneva (IGF2017).

Make a difference - show up!

Keywords

IoT; IGF2017; Ethics; multistakeholder; security; privacy; safety

Session description

The Dynamic Coalition on the Internet of Things that was set up during the 2008 meeting of the Internet Governance Forum in Hyderabad aims to come to a global, multistakeholder understanding of “good practice” in the Internet of Things. A draft paper on global good practice and embraced the following Principle has been developed and adopted for further progress:

“Internet of Things Good Practice aims at developing loT systems, products, and services taking ethical considerations into account from the outset, both in the development, deployment and use phases of the life cycle, thus to find an ethical, sustainable way ahead using loT helping to create a free, secure and rights enabling based environment: a future we want, full with safe opportunities to embrace.”

It is our aim to further the multistakeholder dialogue over the coming year. We fully recognise that IoT is global, and that sustainable development (in the sense of the Brundtland definition: a balance of social, economic and environmental factors) can only be the result of an approach in which all stakeholders work together (multistakeholder approach) in an ethical way (ethical by design). This needs to be championed on a global level, by all those committed to the Global good practice for IoT. For EuroDIG 2017, we ask for input in particular relating to the following calls for action:

1- The need to actively pursue clarity on what is legally allowed and/or what is crucial for responsible advancement of IoT, and what not, by developing a (global) taxonomy. We believe it would be important to develop a taxonomy on security sensitivity (need to secure access to IoT data and actuators); on privacy sensitivity (access and integrity of data that can be related to persons), and safety (potential impact of the IoT operations on human beings, for instance driverless cars, health regulators in the body, etc.). a. Such clarity will make developers and deployers of IoT products and services more aware of requirements with regards to these aspects, whereas otherwise the danger is “time to market” will prevail to other considerations; b. Such clarity will take away unnecessary hindrances of IoT developments in areas where there is no need for high attention to security, safety and/or privacy protection which will open the way to more rapid development and deployment;

2- The need to further empower the multistakeholder approach by raising awareness of the issues towards citizens, and ensure their perspective is taken into account. In order to be able to truly develop IoT in a multistakeholder way, all stakeholders need to become aware of the stakes: not only industry and government, but also citizens. An active role towards providing balanced information regarding to IoT related developments would help ensure people step in to the discussion and development at the right time, rather than “wake up one day and realize what they missed – and what has become common practice.”

3- Consider future developments to “guide responsible development” by foresight, while choices are still possible. Hand in hand with the increasing penetration of IoT devices in our societies, also the intelligence of devices and cyber physical systems (i.e. systems in which IoT devices jointly deliver an more or less autonomous service, such as a vehicle, and towards the future maybe even public and private spaces with automatic climate control and other services), it is foreseeable that artificial intelligence will become much higher than human intelligence at some point in the future. How do we ensure the IoT enabled environments that are managed by autonomous and developing (learning) intelligence will continue to serve us in healthy ways? It is important to consider the moral and ethical dimension in this prior to these practices becoming “normal”.

We will also explore possible other issues to be put on the agenda for IGF2017 for a further debate at global level in a multistakeholder way, such as <identifyers>, <unintended consequences awareness>, <dealing with vulnerabilities>, etc.

This meeting is open to all that want to support the global dialogue in this, and we look forward to seeing you in Tallinn, or later this year in Washington (USA IGF) or Geneva (IGF2017).


You can follow IGF DC IoT at the website and/or subscribe to the mailing list

Format

This meeting is open to all participants. We will introduce the work of the IGF DC IoT and raise the questions as indicated in the summary of this session. The meeting will be moderated, and a report will be posted at the EuroDIG site and http://www.iot-dynamic-coalition.org/

Further reading

See http://www.iot-dynamic-coalition.org/

People

The meeting will be moderated by the Chairman of the IGF DC IoT, Maarten Botterman

Maarten Botterman is Director of ICANN, Chairman of the IGF Dynamic Coalition on the Internet of Things, and Chairman of the Supervisory Board of NLnet Foundation. As independent authority on future Internet and Internet Governance matters he combines insight in new technology potential with user interests to develop strategic opportunities for policy and businesses. He builds on experience as former Director at RAND Corporation (European Office), Scientific Officer European Commission, and Senior Advisor/Head of Unit at the Dutch Ministry of Transport. Chairman IGF DC IoT

Messages

Please provide a short summary from the outcome of your session. Bullet points are fine.