GIPO: what is the sustainable governance model for Internet Policy Observatory? – Pre 04 2017: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Sessionadvice01}} | {{Sessionadvice01}} | ||
== Session teaser == | == Session teaser == | ||
13.00-13.20 Flash presentation of the GIPO tool | |||
13.20-13.45 Community building in GIPO: Should we build Regional Working Groups? | |||
13.45-14.10 Sustainability of GIPO: does an automated tool need a governance structure? | |||
14.10-14.30 Helping improve multistakeholderism by increasing the number of stakeholders and the usefulness of the tools: GIPO’s role (A Follow Up to the IES Policy Brief on Building Better Multistakeholderism) | |||
== People == | == People == | ||
GIPO´s Advisory Group Co-oridnators: Jamal Shahin and Trish Meyer, IES, VUB | |||
GIPO´s Stakeholder Engagament: Kasia Jakimowicz | |||
== Messages == |
Revision as of 16:25, 3 May 2017
Programme overview 2017 Consolidated programme 2018 overview
To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page
Final title of the session: Please send the final title until 15 April 2018 latest to wiki@eurodig.org. Do not edit the title of the page at the wiki on your own. The link to your session may otherwise disappear.
13.00-13.20 Flash presentation of the GIPO tool 13.20-13.45 Community building in GIPO: Should we build Regional Working Groups? 13.45-14.10 Sustainability of GIPO: does an automated tool need a governance structure? 14.10-14.30 Helping improve multistakeholderism by increasing the number of stakeholders and the usefulness of the tools: GIPO’s role (A Follow Up to the IES Policy Brief on Building Better Multistakeholderism)
People
GIPO´s Advisory Group Co-oridnators: Jamal Shahin and Trish Meyer, IES, VUB GIPO´s Stakeholder Engagament: Kasia Jakimowicz