Talk:Youth working group

Discussion about the format

It might also be a possibility to combine two formats. For example, have first Pecha Kucha presentations by selected speakers, followed by a Fish Bowl debate which nicely structures discussions in big groups and enables every participant to contribute. // Pecha Kucha sounds good for presenting certain ideas or view points; but I think that if we want audience to get involved and being able to participate interactively in the discussion and raise questions, we should go for the open space technology, world coffee and maybe hot chair at as well // I would like to try Speed Geeking. It sounds very energetic and the presenters are forced to make clear, short statements.

Discussion about suggested speakers

Kevin Mitnick Jacob Appelbaum

Discussion about key questions

Privacy is always linked to transparency what might seem paradoxical at first glance. However, Snowden's act to reveal the "watchers" was aiming at creating transparency in order to, at the same time, protecting our privacy. Governments which lack transparency can only be described as defect democracies. Therefore, I would like to discuss how the public sphere can re-build a culture of transparency and privacy in equal measure and link this to political decision-making. 15. April 2014 17:30 // I believe contrasting two powerful concepts such as privacy and freedom of expression would encapsulate some current challenges in trying to 'define' the fine line that exists between the two in some cases. What is the balance in order to preserve both?