When the public sphere became private – WS 01 2014: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''Session description:''' | '''Session description:''' | ||
The present session is aimed to address the issues and current structural changes that are viewed within the public and private spheres. The session will be focused on the current changes/transformations in the public/private provided by the points of views of the representatives of the main stakeholder groups (state/interstate – business- users/public) and their possible solutions. Over the last years more and more public fields and services became private or out of public sovereignty and control. IT infrastructures and services provided by municipalities and public authorities are not based on open source and standards but proprietary brands and norms. In certain cases, public services are even outsourced to private enterprises like Arvato (“a leading international service provider that thrives on digital technology”) what is usually called “public-private partnership”(PPP). And while the public is usually informed about “advantages of such PPPs”, key questions like WHO owns (sovereignty) and controls public infrastructures and services are not even raised. Or should public data (from registration or tax offices etc.) be run and managed by private service providers and under what conditions? | |||
Some assessments (Berliner Manifest 2008) observe an “usurpation of the public sphere” with fatal consequences and loss of public sovereignty when its services depend on private IT infrastructures and proprietary systems. It raises concerns about eGovernment models and applications, transparency, open access, safeguarding critical infrastructures etc.) | |||
In a broader context, traditional public services like education, transport, health, housing, broadcasting, libraries etc. are “sold out” while municipalities cannot afford its maintenance any longer – water supply is a worst case. On the other hand, access of the public and provision of basic supplies is understood as a human right in the digital age. The outlined problems will be discussed during this WS in order to provide relevant responses and perspectives. Or what are the limits and borderlines of public-private partnerships? | |||
<div style="float:right;padding:6px;margin:6px;border:1px dotted gray;"> | <div style="float:right;padding:6px;margin:6px;border:1px dotted gray;"> | ||
Revision as of 20:17, 19 May 2014
Session title: When the public sphere became private
Session subject: see discussion
Session description: The present session is aimed to address the issues and current structural changes that are viewed within the public and private spheres. The session will be focused on the current changes/transformations in the public/private provided by the points of views of the representatives of the main stakeholder groups (state/interstate – business- users/public) and their possible solutions. Over the last years more and more public fields and services became private or out of public sovereignty and control. IT infrastructures and services provided by municipalities and public authorities are not based on open source and standards but proprietary brands and norms. In certain cases, public services are even outsourced to private enterprises like Arvato (“a leading international service provider that thrives on digital technology”) what is usually called “public-private partnership”(PPP). And while the public is usually informed about “advantages of such PPPs”, key questions like WHO owns (sovereignty) and controls public infrastructures and services are not even raised. Or should public data (from registration or tax offices etc.) be run and managed by private service providers and under what conditions? Some assessments (Berliner Manifest 2008) observe an “usurpation of the public sphere” with fatal consequences and loss of public sovereignty when its services depend on private IT infrastructures and proprietary systems. It raises concerns about eGovernment models and applications, transparency, open access, safeguarding critical infrastructures etc.) In a broader context, traditional public services like education, transport, health, housing, broadcasting, libraries etc. are “sold out” while municipalities cannot afford its maintenance any longer – water supply is a worst case. On the other hand, access of the public and provision of basic supplies is understood as a human right in the digital age. The outlined problems will be discussed during this WS in order to provide relevant responses and perspectives. Or what are the limits and borderlines of public-private partnerships?
People:
- Focal point: Plamena Popova, University of Library Studies and IT (UniBIT)
- Live moderator: Gry Hasselbalch
- Rapporteur: tbd
- Remote participation moderator: tbd
- Digital facilitator: Lorena
- Panelists/speakers: (suggested list of panelist/speakers)
*Rikke Frank Jørgensen, Danish Institute of Human Rights (confirmed) *Annette Muhlberg, ver.di - (confirmed) *Minka Stoyanova, Fulbright Fellow (confirmed) *Aral Balkan, indie phone (invited) *IFLA representative (invited)
- Participants: tbc
Format of this working group at EuroDIG: Workshop. tbd
Protocol. Discussions: see discussion
Further reading: Berlin Manifesto
Live stream / remote participation: Link
Final report from working group: PDF (approx. 2 weeks after event)
Mailing List: tbc
Preparatory meetings:
- date (venue)
- link (online)
Pictures from working group: Link
Session tags:
Session twitter hashtag: