View source for Criminal justice on the Internet – identifying common solutions – WS 4 2017

7 June 2017 | 11:00 - 12:30 | Ballroom I, Swissotel, Tallinn, Estonia | [[image:Icon_remote_20px.png | remote participation | link=Programme_overview_2017]] | [[image:Icons_live_20px.png | live streaming | link=Programme_overview_2017]]<br />
[[Programme overview 2017| Programme overview '''wiki''']] | [https://www.eurodig.org/index.php?id=707 Programme overview '''EuroDIG web site''']

== Session teaser ==

Digital investigations are not all about cybercrime or internet enabled crime anymore. Almost every real life criminal act from shoplifting, robbery, car theft  leave digital traces. Law enforcement has short arms: collecting electronic evidence is getting increasingly complex in a cross-border environment with many unregulated intermediaries. Criminal justice in cyberspace depends on the development of working solutions to the problem of digital evidence collection, but different stakeholders are still struggling not only to find those solutions, but even to speak the same language.

During this session we will bring together various stakeholders: law enforcement, legislators, civil society and private sector to discuss possible solutions to the challenge of criminal justice in cyberspace. Our goal is make us walking in each others' shoes and understand each other's concerns. Join us and contribute to the discussion!

== Keywords ==
cybercrime, digital investigations, law enforcement, digital evidence, electronic evidence, criminal justice

== Session description == 

When it comes to the Internet, law enforcement is not operating in a lawless land. However, digital investigations are problematic because of the patchwork of national laws, slow mutual legal assistance system and the need to cooperate with intermediaries located in foreign jurisdictions. Furthermore, criminal procedural law is subject of strict safeguards and must always respect human rights. 
What are the legal and ad-hoc solutions for solving the problem of obtaining digital evidence? How do law enforcement cooperate - and would like to do so in the future - with intermediaries? What can we do to improve this cooperation? What are the best practices?
The session will discuss some of the problems, particular existing solutions and the way to improve the cooperation between law enforcement and other stakeholders without compromising on human rights and safeguards. The issues to be discussed, among others are:
Practical solutions to existing challenges. e.g. Carrier-grade NATs issue.
*Clear frameworks for cooperation between intermediaries and law enforcement. 
*Current and future solutions for jurisdictional problems in obtaining digital evidence. 
*Human rights and safeguarding  privacy.

== Format == 

All the participants to engage in the discussion. The panellists invited to the workshop are the resource persons for the discussion, and the co-moderators will ensure that the workshop is interactive with everyone contributing. The main goal of this session is to ensure that stakeholders are aware of each other’s problems and are ready to discuss and work towards a common solution.

The moderators will open the floor for everyone’s questions and comments during the whole session making sure the discussion remain on the topic.

== Further reading == 
'''Until 30 April 2017.''' Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. 
Example for an external link: [http://www.eurodig.org/ Main page of EuroDIG]

== People == 
*'''Focal Point:''' Richard Leaning, RIPE NCC


*'''Subject Matter Expert (SME):''' Tatiana Tropina (Max Planck Institute)


*'''Key Participants'''
**Gregory Mounier, Head of Outreach at European Cybercrime Centre (EC3), Europol 
**Catrin Bauer-Bulst, Deputy Head of Unit, DG HOME, European Commission 
**Konstantinos Komaitis, ISOC
**Christian Borggreen, Director, CCIA Europe


*'''Moderator'''
**Richard Leaning, RIPE NCC
**TBC


*'''Remote Moderator'''
**Fotjon Kosta, ‎Head of ICT at Ministry of Energy and Industry, Albania 


*'''Organising Team (Org Team)''' <br>'''As they sign up''' The Org Team is a group of people shaping the session. Org Teams are open and every interested individual can become a member.


*'''Reporter'''
**Tatiana Tropina, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law 


== Current discussion, conference calls, schedules and minutes ==
See the [[{{TALKPAGENAME}} | discussion]] tab on the upper left side of this page. 

== Contact == 
Get in contact with the Org Team by sending an [mailto:ws4@eurodig.org email].

== Video record ==
Will be provided here after the event.

== Transcript ==
Will be provided here after the event.

== Messages ==  
Please provide a short summary from the outcome of your session. Bullet points are fine.

[[Category:2017]][[Category:Sessions 2017]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Security and crime 2017]]