Internet content blocking – from collateral damages to better solutions (ISOC) – Flash 09 2017: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Sessionadvice01}}
{{Sessionadvice01}}
== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
The use of Internet blocking by governments to prevent access to content deemed illegal is a worldwide and growing trend. Building on findings from a recent [https://www.internetsociety.org/doc/internet-content-blocking Internet Society paper on Internet content blocking], the session will highlight common drawbacks associated with these measures. Invited guests will provide first-hand accounts of some of the collateral damages from content blocking techniques, as well as tease areas where more constructive solutions could be found.
The use of Internet blocking by governments to prevent access to content deemed illegal is a worldwide and growing trend. What's wrong with it, and how to do better?


== Keywords ==
== Keywords ==
blocking, shutdowns
Blocking, Shutdowns


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  
'''Until 20 May 2017.'''
The use of Internet blocking by governments to prevent access to content deemed illegal is a worldwide and growing trend. Building on findings from a recent [https://www.internetsociety.org/doc/internet-content-blocking Internet Society paper on Internet content blocking], the session will highlight common drawbacks associated with these measures. Invited guests will provide first-hand accounts of some of the collateral damages from content blocking techniques, as well as tease areas where more constructive solutions could be found.
Always use your own words to describe your session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.


== Format ==  
== Format ==  
'''Until 20 May 2017.''' Please try out new interactive formats.
The session will start with a brief presentation of key findings from the Internet Society paper on Internet content blocking. It will quickly be followed by an interactive exchange with the audience, including a set of key interveners sharing practical insights: cases of collateral damages (CloudFlare), inefficiency of blocks (Turkey) and possible solutions for better cooperation around illegal content (Internet & Jurisdiction).  


== Further reading ==  
== Further reading ==  
'''Until 20 May 2017.''' Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible.
[https://www.internetsociety.org/doc/internet-content-blocking/ PAPER: Internet Society Perspectives on Internet Content Blocking: An Overview] <br>
Example for an external link: [http://www.eurodig.org/ Main page of EuroDIG]
[https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/02/a-court-order-blocked-pirate-sites-that-werent-supposed-to-be-blocked/ ARTICLE: A court order blocked pirate sites that weren’t supposed to be blocked] <br>
[http://www.internetjurisdiction.net/uploads/pdfs/Papers/Content-Jurisdiction-Program-Paper.pdf/ PAPER: Cross-border content takedown (Internet & Jurisdiction)]


== People ==  
== People ==  
'''Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.'''
'''Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.'''
 
*Nicolas Seidler, Internet Society <br>
*Caroline Greer, CloudFlare <br>
*Paul Fehlinger, Internet & Jurisdiction <br>
*Participants from Turkey (tbc)


[[Category:2017]][[Category:Sessions 2017]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Flash 2017]]
[[Category:2017]][[Category:Sessions 2017]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Flash 2017]]

Revision as of 11:55, 18 May 2017

Internet content blocking: from collateral damages to better solutions (ISOC) – Flash 09 2017

Programme overview 2017 Consolidated programme 2018 overview

To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page

Final title of the session: Please send the final title until 15 April 2018 latest to wiki@eurodig.org. Do not edit the title of the page at the wiki on your own. The link to your session may otherwise disappear.

Session teaser

The use of Internet blocking by governments to prevent access to content deemed illegal is a worldwide and growing trend. What's wrong with it, and how to do better?

Keywords

Blocking, Shutdowns

Session description

The use of Internet blocking by governments to prevent access to content deemed illegal is a worldwide and growing trend. Building on findings from a recent Internet Society paper on Internet content blocking, the session will highlight common drawbacks associated with these measures. Invited guests will provide first-hand accounts of some of the collateral damages from content blocking techniques, as well as tease areas where more constructive solutions could be found.

Format

The session will start with a brief presentation of key findings from the Internet Society paper on Internet content blocking. It will quickly be followed by an interactive exchange with the audience, including a set of key interveners sharing practical insights: cases of collateral damages (CloudFlare), inefficiency of blocks (Turkey) and possible solutions for better cooperation around illegal content (Internet & Jurisdiction).

Further reading

PAPER: Internet Society Perspectives on Internet Content Blocking: An Overview
ARTICLE: A court order blocked pirate sites that weren’t supposed to be blocked
PAPER: Cross-border content takedown (Internet & Jurisdiction)

People

Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.

  • Nicolas Seidler, Internet Society
  • Caroline Greer, CloudFlare
  • Paul Fehlinger, Internet & Jurisdiction
  • Participants from Turkey (tbc)
Retrieved from "https://eurodigwiki.org/mw/index.php?title=Internet_content_blocking_–_from_collateral_damages_to_better_solutions_(ISOC)_–_Flash_09_2017&oldid=9531"