List of proposals for EuroDIG 2023: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 111: Line 111:
| 38 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#topic1_sub2_23 | Topic 1 / Subtopic 2 ]] || André Melancia || Technical Community || Technical community || || || <span class="table-squares-23 hu-ri">n</span> || || || || <span class="table-squares-23 s-a-c">n</span> || <span class="table-squares-23 t-a-o">n</span> || Processes (political, legislative, technical community awareness, etc.) to guarantee the implementation of Technically proven solutions to many problems of today's Internet, including IPv4 address exhaustion (causing a disparity of costs in different countries in the world and limiting access) by using IPv6, guaranteeing digitally signed and also encrypted DNS (for security and privacy, with many technical options available), guaranteeing cheap or free (and facilitated) access to HTTPS encryption certificates and their effective usage (for security and privacy), IoT implementation issues (including tampering, communication and storage security, etc.), and much more. Please note many of these issues are critical in today's non-Democratic scenarios (censorship, war, etc.)  
| 38 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#topic1_sub2_23 | Topic 1 / Subtopic 2 ]] || André Melancia || Technical Community || Technical community || || || <span class="table-squares-23 hu-ri">n</span> || || || || <span class="table-squares-23 s-a-c">n</span> || <span class="table-squares-23 t-a-o">n</span> || Processes (political, legislative, technical community awareness, etc.) to guarantee the implementation of Technically proven solutions to many problems of today's Internet, including IPv4 address exhaustion (causing a disparity of costs in different countries in the world and limiting access) by using IPv6, guaranteeing digitally signed and also encrypted DNS (for security and privacy, with many technical options available), guaranteeing cheap or free (and facilitated) access to HTTPS encryption certificates and their effective usage (for security and privacy), IoT implementation issues (including tampering, communication and storage security, etc.), and much more. Please note many of these issues are critical in today's non-Democratic scenarios (censorship, war, etc.)  
|- id="prop_39"
|- id="prop_39"
| 39 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#topic3_sub2_23 | Topic 3 / Subtopic 2 ]] / [[consolidated_programme_2023#flash09_23 | Flash 9 ]] || Callum Voge || Internet Society || Civil society || || || <span class="table-squares-23 hu-ri">n</span> || || || || <span class="table-squares-23 s-a-c">n</span> || <span class="table-squares-23 t-a-o">n</span> || Both the European Union and the United Kingdom have proposed new rules that seek to improve safety online. While these rules are well intended, both proposals take an approach that places an obligation on online communication service providers to screen private communications to detect harmful content. This obligation would, in practice, push service providers to either weaken or remove end-to-end encryption entirely. Encryption is an integral building block for the open, globally connected, secure and trustworthy Internet. Decisions made in the EU or the UK have global appeal and would be copied by other government around the world, including those that would exploit the loss of encryption for political control and censorship. Relevant documents: EU proposal for a regulation laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual UK Online Safety Bill  
| 39 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#topic3_sub2_23 | Topic 3 / Subtopic 2 ]] / [[consolidated_programme_2023#ws05_23 | WS 5 ]] || Callum Voge || Internet Society || Civil society || || || <span class="table-squares-23 hu-ri">n</span> || || || || <span class="table-squares-23 s-a-c">n</span> || <span class="table-squares-23 t-a-o">n</span> || Both the European Union and the United Kingdom have proposed new rules that seek to improve safety online. While these rules are well intended, both proposals take an approach that places an obligation on online communication service providers to screen private communications to detect harmful content. This obligation would, in practice, push service providers to either weaken or remove end-to-end encryption entirely. Encryption is an integral building block for the open, globally connected, secure and trustworthy Internet. Decisions made in the EU or the UK have global appeal and would be copied by other government around the world, including those that would exploit the loss of encryption for political control and censorship. Relevant documents: EU proposal for a regulation laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual UK Online Safety Bill  
|- id="prop_40"
|- id="prop_40"
| 40 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#topic2_sub3_23 | Topic 2 / Subtopic 3]] || Sébastien Bachollet || Interne Society France (&) EURALO || Civil society || || <span class="table-squares-23 ig-eco">n</span> || <span class="table-squares-23 hu-ri">n</span> || || || || || <span class="table-squares-23 t-a-o">n</span> || Improving Digital cooperation is a key priority of the United Nations both at the global level and local level. Building on the roadmap for digital cooperation which suggested strengthening the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) ecosystem, it is essential to foster a multi-stakeholder approach and improve digital cooperation at the national and local levels. Cooperation between European IGFs, local and regional (NRIs), and between NRIs and the European institutions is key to enabling tangible outcomes for stakeholders.Improving Multi-stakeholder fora is a key priority for Internet end users and the other stakeholder groups. Their participation at all levels (national, regional and global) is very important for the various actors but also for the future of Internet Governance.Key questions arise: what role could the IGF and NRIs play after 2025? How to strengthen multi stakeholder cooperation at the local and regional level? How to take the messages developed at those levels to the global IGFs? How to encourage tangible outcomes for Internet users?
| 40 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#topic2_sub3_23 | Topic 2 / Subtopic 3]] || Sébastien Bachollet || Interne Society France (&) EURALO || Civil society || || <span class="table-squares-23 ig-eco">n</span> || <span class="table-squares-23 hu-ri">n</span> || || || || || <span class="table-squares-23 t-a-o">n</span> || Improving Digital cooperation is a key priority of the United Nations both at the global level and local level. Building on the roadmap for digital cooperation which suggested strengthening the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) ecosystem, it is essential to foster a multi-stakeholder approach and improve digital cooperation at the national and local levels. Cooperation between European IGFs, local and regional (NRIs), and between NRIs and the European institutions is key to enabling tangible outcomes for stakeholders.Improving Multi-stakeholder fora is a key priority for Internet end users and the other stakeholder groups. Their participation at all levels (national, regional and global) is very important for the various actors but also for the future of Internet Governance.Key questions arise: what role could the IGF and NRIs play after 2025? How to strengthen multi stakeholder cooperation at the local and regional level? How to take the messages developed at those levels to the global IGFs? How to encourage tangible outcomes for Internet users?
Line 123: Line 123:
| 44 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#topic3_sub3_23 | Topic 3 / Subtopic 3 ]] || Stephen Wyber || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || <span class="table-squares-23 a-a-l">n</span> || || || || || || || || Echoing a proposal made by the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia, we would like to suggest that an issue that could be usefully explored is how we can make for meaningful and effective media and information literacy in Europe as a support for citizenship. A debate should draw on the experience of different actors in working to build individuals' own resilience and resistance to misinformation online during the pandemic. This would mirror the extensive work already done by the European Commission around codes of conduct for social media platforms by putting a welcome focus on empowering and enabling individuals, helping ensure a more rounded European response.  In particular, discussion about such issues should get beyond more basic approaches and look in depth at what does and doesn't seem to work, as well as the interaction between media and information literacy and wider citizenship education. It could draw on researchers from different fields to help inform policy discussion as well, and make sure that we avoid overly simplistic or ineffective solutions.  We would recommend that there is consideration, in this context, of how existing networks can be drawn on, in particular libraries, which have strong existing links with communities and  experience and expertise in collecting and sharing knowledge with all, rather than any one single group such as school-age children.
| 44 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#topic3_sub3_23 | Topic 3 / Subtopic 3 ]] || Stephen Wyber || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || <span class="table-squares-23 a-a-l">n</span> || || || || || || || || Echoing a proposal made by the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia, we would like to suggest that an issue that could be usefully explored is how we can make for meaningful and effective media and information literacy in Europe as a support for citizenship. A debate should draw on the experience of different actors in working to build individuals' own resilience and resistance to misinformation online during the pandemic. This would mirror the extensive work already done by the European Commission around codes of conduct for social media platforms by putting a welcome focus on empowering and enabling individuals, helping ensure a more rounded European response.  In particular, discussion about such issues should get beyond more basic approaches and look in depth at what does and doesn't seem to work, as well as the interaction between media and information literacy and wider citizenship education. It could draw on researchers from different fields to help inform policy discussion as well, and make sure that we avoid overly simplistic or ineffective solutions.  We would recommend that there is consideration, in this context, of how existing networks can be drawn on, in particular libraries, which have strong existing links with communities and  experience and expertise in collecting and sharing knowledge with all, rather than any one single group such as school-age children.
|- id="prop_45"
|- id="prop_45"
| 45 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#ws05_23 | WS 5 ]] || Stephen Wyber || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || <span class="table-squares-23 a-a-l">n</span> || || || || || || || || Not all internet access is equal. The sort of global standards used by the ITU and Broadband Commission too often also include infrequent or low quality access that are far from being able to provide the meaningful internet access that is needed to deliver on the full potential of connectivity. Beyond simple connectivity, quality of access is also strongly dependent on skills, confidence, and access to content.  Delivering on this can stray far beyond core digital policies, and require engagement with and contributions from other policy areas, not least education, urban development, and culture. It can also imply a more comprehensive set of solutions for access itself, including public access and secondary access solutions in times of disaster.  It would therefore be valuable to use the opportunity provided by the evidence of the pandemic in order to think again about what it means for Europe to promote inclusive and meaningful internet access.  
| 45 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#flash09_23 | Flash 9 ]] || Stephen Wyber || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || <span class="table-squares-23 a-a-l">n</span> || || || || || || || || Not all internet access is equal. The sort of global standards used by the ITU and Broadband Commission too often also include infrequent or low quality access that are far from being able to provide the meaningful internet access that is needed to deliver on the full potential of connectivity. Beyond simple connectivity, quality of access is also strongly dependent on skills, confidence, and access to content.  Delivering on this can stray far beyond core digital policies, and require engagement with and contributions from other policy areas, not least education, urban development, and culture. It can also imply a more comprehensive set of solutions for access itself, including public access and secondary access solutions in times of disaster.  It would therefore be valuable to use the opportunity provided by the evidence of the pandemic in order to think again about what it means for Europe to promote inclusive and meaningful internet access.  
|- id="prop_46"
|- id="prop_46"
| 46 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#topic3_sub2_23 | Topic 3 / Subtopic 2 ]] || Stephen Wyber || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || || || || || <span class="table-squares-23 m-a-c">n</span> || || || || The internet brings huge possibilities to boost Europe’s capacity for education, research and access to culture. The pandemic – for those with the skills and connectivity to benefit – demonstrated how much progress could be possible towards a more inclusive Europe through providing remote access. However, it became clear that laws around online content – and in particular copyright – were far from well suited to this, and that too often, the possibility to continue with key public interest activities was dependent on the discretion of rightholders and other gatekeepers.  It would therefore be valuable, building on previous discussions at EuroDIG around the Digital Single Market (DSM) Directive, to look holistically at how well current rules and practices are serving us in terms of enabling access and use. In particular, it would be worth looking at unfinished business from the DSM Directive, as well as in the wider framework, in order to inform early thinking about what could be achieved under the next Commission.  
| 46 || [[consolidated_programme_2023#topic3_sub2_23 | Topic 3 / Subtopic 2 ]] || Stephen Wyber || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || || || || || <span class="table-squares-23 m-a-c">n</span> || || || || The internet brings huge possibilities to boost Europe’s capacity for education, research and access to culture. The pandemic – for those with the skills and connectivity to benefit – demonstrated how much progress could be possible towards a more inclusive Europe through providing remote access. However, it became clear that laws around online content – and in particular copyright – were far from well suited to this, and that too often, the possibility to continue with key public interest activities was dependent on the discretion of rightholders and other gatekeepers.  It would therefore be valuable, building on previous discussions at EuroDIG around the Digital Single Market (DSM) Directive, to look holistically at how well current rules and practices are serving us in terms of enabling access and use. In particular, it would be worth looking at unfinished business from the DSM Directive, as well as in the wider framework, in order to inform early thinking about what could be achieved under the next Commission.  

Revision as of 20:35, 27 February 2023

During the call for issues for EuroDIG we received 60 submissions in the period from 12 September till 31 December 2022. You can see the breakdown of proposals here and download the list of proposals as of 31 December 2022, 24:00 CET as pdf file. The list below is a rolling document where proposals will be added during the review period. Proposals marked with an asterisk * have been added after 31 Dec. 2022.

Categories are coloured as follows: (up to three categories per proposal could be selected)

 Access & literacy   Development of IG ecosystem   Human rights & data protection   Innovation and economic issues   Media & content   Cross cutting / other issues   Security and crime   Technical & operational issues 

You may sort the table by clicking at the head of the column. To restore the original sorting, just reload the page.