List of proposals for EuroDIG and SEEDIG 2020: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
| 15 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Shiwoh Yongho || Medecins du Monde Suisse Bamenda branch || Civil society || Most IG issues have not been perceived and understood despite the many governance regulations and control. Today like never before the Internet suffers from a lot of malpractices and misuse due to lack of a better appreciation of these regulations. Alot of education is still needed as the majority of those going online are new users who does master the don'ts of the Internet and the Dos. Lack of visibility of these regulations implies a lot of education is still needed. || EuroDIG
| 15 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Shiwoh Yongho || Medecins du Monde Suisse Bamenda branch || Civil society || Most IG issues have not been perceived and understood despite the many governance regulations and control. Today like never before the Internet suffers from a lot of malpractices and misuse due to lack of a better appreciation of these regulations. Alot of education is still needed as the majority of those going online are new users who does master the don'ts of the Internet and the Dos. Lack of visibility of these regulations implies a lot of education is still needed. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_23" class="a-a-l"  
|- id="prop_23" class="a-a-l"  
| 23 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Ucha Seturi || Small&Medium Telecom Operators Association of Georgia || Civil society || Community Networks as a reality from the field - are we ready to switch a EU and national laws and give CN access to the internet for everyone? || Both
| 23 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Ucha Seturi || Small&Medium Telecom Operators Association of Georgia || Civil society || Community Networks as a reality from the field - are we ready to switch a EU and national laws and give CN access to the internet for everyone? || Both
|- id="prop_33" class="a-a-l"  
|- id="prop_33" class="a-a-l"  
| 33 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Luis Martinez || Internet Society || Academia || Community Networks. The next billion is the hardest to be connected to the Internet. A feasible way is by establishing community networks. Such small RLAN involve more than network engineering, it is a community development issue. Hence, Internet Community should study the issue on how to connect the next billion with respect to their cultural values and principles. || EuroDIG
| 33 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Luis Martinez || Internet Society || Academia || Community Networks. The next billion is the hardest to be connected to the Internet. A feasible way is by establishing community networks. Such small RLAN involve more than network engineering, it is a community development issue. Hence, Internet Community should study the issue on how to connect the next billion with respect to their cultural values and principles. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_55" class="a-a-l"  
|- id="prop_55" class="a-a-l"  
| 55 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Carola Croll || Digital Opportunities Foundation || Civil society || How can digital services and tools be utilised to advance rural communities and promote the quality of village life in a sustainable and affordable future? Which role does digital inclusion play for the rural population of Europe? || EuroDIG
| 55 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Carola Croll || Digital Opportunities Foundation || Civil society || How can digital services and tools be utilised to advance rural communities and promote the quality of village life in a sustainable and affordable future? Which role does digital inclusion play for the rural population of Europe? || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_57" class="a-a-l"  
|- id="prop_57" class="a-a-l"  
| 57 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre06_20|PRE 6]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws15_20|WS 15]] || Patrik Fältström || Netnod || Technical community || Does universal acceptance bring fragmentation? -- As long as language (writing systems and more) reflects (or drives, depending on who one listens to) culture and norms and there are the sorts of cultural differences that make translation of concepts (not just words) between languages difficult, the more we adapt systems to be comfortable and familiar-feeling within a cultural and language grouping, the harder it is going to get to communicate between systems associated with different groupings. Increased localization creates stronger groups where the localization ends up being barriers between the groups instead of bridges. || Both
| 57 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre06_20|PRE 6]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws15_20|WS 15]] || Patrik Fältström || Netnod || Technical community || Does universal acceptance bring fragmentation? -- As long as language (writing systems and more) reflects (or drives, depending on who one listens to) culture and norms and there are the sorts of cultural differences that make translation of concepts (not just words) between languages difficult, the more we adapt systems to be comfortable and familiar-feeling within a cultural and language grouping, the harder it is going to get to communicate between systems associated with different groupings. Increased localization creates stronger groups where the localization ends up being barriers between the groups instead of bridges. || Both
|- id="prop_61" class="a-a-l"  
|- id="prop_61" class="a-a-l"  
| 61 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Valensiya Dresvyannikova || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || How do we maximise the potential of public internet access to foster digital inclusion and bring more people online? Public access can be a powerful way to help overcome affordability barriers to connectivity. Its potential has motivated, for example, the introduction of the WiFi4EU program in Europe, an initiative to install free WiFi access points in public places throughout the EU. What have been the impacts of this initiative and other policies aiming to support digital inclusion through public access? What good practices can be shared, and what lessons have been learned? How do public access facilities in places such as libraries or telecenters support meaningful internet access today – from supporting digital literacy initiatives to helping people make use of e-learning and e-government services? || EuroDIG
| 61 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Valensiya Dresvyannikova || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || How do we maximise the potential of public internet access to foster digital inclusion and bring more people online? Public access can be a powerful way to help overcome affordability barriers to connectivity. Its potential has motivated, for example, the introduction of the WiFi4EU program in Europe, an initiative to install free WiFi access points in public places throughout the EU. What have been the impacts of this initiative and other policies aiming to support digital inclusion through public access? What good practices can be shared, and what lessons have been learned? How do public access facilities in places such as libraries or telecenters support meaningful internet access today – from supporting digital literacy initiatives to helping people make use of e-learning and e-government services? || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_62" class="a-a-l"  
|- id="prop_62" class="a-a-l"  
| 62 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Valensiya Dresvyannikova || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || How do we ensure inclusive and effective digital literacy learning opportunities for all? 2017 Eurostat estimates show, for example, that there are many EU countries where 60% or less individuals have “basic or above basic” digital skills. It is therefore important to make sure that more people have access to digital skills training. Next to formal academic and educational institutions, informal lifelong learning opportunities are needed for people who do not have access to formal programmes. What interventions have been successful in reaching them? What should this training entail - what skills and competencies do people need to meaningfully participate in the digital society today? This can range from performing basic tasks and online safety for digital newcomers, to media and information literacy skills that help people navigate the complex informational landscapes, to understanding the effects of algorithms on access to information online, or making informed choices on digital privacy. || EuroDIG
| 62 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Valensiya Dresvyannikova || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || How do we ensure inclusive and effective digital literacy learning opportunities for all? 2017 Eurostat estimates show, for example, that there are many EU countries where 60% or less individuals have “basic or above basic” digital skills. It is therefore important to make sure that more people have access to digital skills training. Next to formal academic and educational institutions, informal lifelong learning opportunities are needed for people who do not have access to formal programmes. What interventions have been successful in reaching them? What should this training entail - what skills and competencies do people need to meaningfully participate in the digital society today? This can range from performing basic tasks and online safety for digital newcomers, to media and information literacy skills that help people navigate the complex informational landscapes, to understanding the effects of algorithms on access to information online, or making informed choices on digital privacy. || EuroDIG
Line 33: Line 33:
| 81 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Daniel Krupka || Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. || Technical community || Digital Literacy is neither only awareness for content, nor only coding. An inclusive, and proactive approach is needed to address socio-cultural, technical and application-oriented perspectives. Regional and national frameworks for competences, and skills in digital education are being developed as the Internet (shall) become a part of everyone’s learning journey. Different European initiatives and research findings could be explored to continue the conversation on best practice and the future of digital education in Europe. || EuroDIG
| 81 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Daniel Krupka || Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. || Technical community || Digital Literacy is neither only awareness for content, nor only coding. An inclusive, and proactive approach is needed to address socio-cultural, technical and application-oriented perspectives. Regional and national frameworks for competences, and skills in digital education are being developed as the Internet (shall) become a part of everyone’s learning journey. Different European initiatives and research findings could be explored to continue the conversation on best practice and the future of digital education in Europe. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_83" class="a-a-l"  
|- id="prop_83" class="a-a-l"  
| 83 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Daniel Krupka || Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. || Technical community || Literacy in underserved regions: Rural regions across Europe, even if Internet access has been established, have limited access to innovative forms of digital education. While the Internet can be a tool to convey educational content, it should be explored how to effectively bring digital literacy to those regions, and how to equip educators with the necessary skills. || EuroDIG
| 83 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Daniel Krupka || Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. || Technical community || Literacy in underserved regions: Rural regions across Europe, even if Internet access has been established, have limited access to innovative forms of digital education. While the Internet can be a tool to convey educational content, it should be explored how to effectively bring digital literacy to those regions, and how to equip educators with the necessary skills. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_91" class="a-a-l"  
|- id="prop_91" class="a-a-l"  
| 91 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Vassilis Chryssos || Sarantaporo.gr Non Profit Organization || Civil society || Building community broadband networks to bring meaningful connectivity to the unconnected around the globe. Broadband community networks are a bottom-up approach to modern telecommunications infrastructure, which empowers local communities to use it to address their specific needs. || Both
| 91 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Vassilis Chryssos || Sarantaporo.gr Non Profit Organization || Civil society || Building community broadband networks to bring meaningful connectivity to the unconnected around the globe. Broadband community networks are a bottom-up approach to modern telecommunications infrastructure, which empowers local communities to use it to address their specific needs. || Both
|- id="prop_97" class="a-a-l"  
|- id="prop_97" class="a-a-l"  
| 97 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Oliana Sula || University "Aleksander Mosiu" Durres/Estonian Bsuiness School || Academia || Proposed Issue: Artifical Intelligence Readiness - is it a matter of Artificial Intelligence literacy and Artificial Intelligence skills? Explanation of the relevance: Some countries in Europe such as Portugal have elaborated AI strategies focusing in a skills and literacy perspective for all. Are we assesing AI needs from a readiness perspective? || Both
| 97 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Oliana Sula || University "Aleksander Mosiu" Durres/Estonian Bsuiness School || Academia || Proposed Issue: Artifical Intelligence Readiness - is it a matter of Artificial Intelligence literacy and Artificial Intelligence skills? Explanation of the relevance: Some countries in Europe such as Portugal have elaborated AI strategies focusing in a skills and literacy perspective for all. Are we assesing AI needs from a readiness perspective? || Both
Line 53: Line 53:
| 3 || Big Stage (TBC) || Amali De Silva-Mitchell || Futurist former WSIS CS || Other || Update from the health care sector on emerging technology issues and benefits for the public , that are visible from a public stand point || Both
| 3 || Big Stage (TBC) || Amali De Silva-Mitchell || Futurist former WSIS CS || Other || Update from the health care sector on emerging technology issues and benefits for the public , that are visible from a public stand point || Both
|- id="prop_27" class="ig-eco"  
|- id="prop_27" class="ig-eco"  
| 27 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Sandro Karumidze || Internet Society - Georgia Chapter || Civil society || Fake news and protection from propaganda tools || EuroDIG
| 27 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Sandro Karumidze || Internet Society - Georgia Chapter || Civil society || Fake news and protection from propaganda tools || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_36" class="ig-eco"  
|- id="prop_36" class="ig-eco"  
| 36 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre06_20|PRE 6]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws15_20|WS 15]] || Lianna Galtyan || ISOC Armenia || Civil society || Universal Acceptance || Both
| 36 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre06_20|PRE 6]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws15_20|WS 15]] || Lianna Galtyan || ISOC Armenia || Civil society || Universal Acceptance || Both
Line 129: Line 129:
| 73 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws13_20|WS 13]], SEEDIG || Vladislava Martin || Individual Expert || Civil society || Data Protection Legislation in SEE countries and struggles they have || SEEDIG
| 73 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws13_20|WS 13]], SEEDIG || Vladislava Martin || Individual Expert || Civil society || Data Protection Legislation in SEE countries and struggles they have || SEEDIG
|- id="prop_93" class="hu-ri"  
|- id="prop_93" class="hu-ri"  
| 93 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws09_20|WS 9]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Mariam Gogosashvili || Georgian Young Lawyers' Association || Civil society || Internet Content Regulation; EU copyright regulations and practice; The challenges of Protecting personal data. || Both
| 93 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws09_20|WS 9]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]] || Mariam Gogosashvili || Georgian Young Lawyers' Association || Civil society || Internet Content Regulation; EU copyright regulations and practice; The challenges of Protecting personal data. || Both
|- id="prop_96" class="hu-ri"  
|- id="prop_96" class="hu-ri"  
| 96 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws14_20|WS 14]] || Debora Barletta || APICE - Agenzia di Promozione Integrata per i Cittadini in Europa || Civil society || My proposal is to have a panel that could discuss the ways in which we can educate algorithms and AI with human rights principles, based on the framework connected with human rights education, which has its own tools and methodologies and that can therefore be transmitted and implemented. The panel should include different stakeholders in order to reflect the principles of the multi-stakeholder approach but also interdisciplinary so to allow a diverse perspective on the topic. The main framework of reference would be the work of the Council of Europe, since it’s now developing researches on the topic and it’s also the lead institution in Europe for human rights education and protection. The main aim of this Big Stage (TBC) in fact would be to discuss and to advocate for some guidelines that would help developers to include human rights principles in algorithms and AI education. || EuroDIG
| 96 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws14_20|WS 14]] || Debora Barletta || APICE - Agenzia di Promozione Integrata per i Cittadini in Europa || Civil society || My proposal is to have a panel that could discuss the ways in which we can educate algorithms and AI with human rights principles, based on the framework connected with human rights education, which has its own tools and methodologies and that can therefore be transmitted and implemented. The panel should include different stakeholders in order to reflect the principles of the multi-stakeholder approach but also interdisciplinary so to allow a diverse perspective on the topic. The main framework of reference would be the work of the Council of Europe, since it’s now developing researches on the topic and it’s also the lead institution in Europe for human rights education and protection. The main aim of this Big Stage (TBC) in fact would be to discuss and to advocate for some guidelines that would help developers to include human rights principles in algorithms and AI education. || EuroDIG
Line 145: Line 145:
| 136 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || Olga Kyryliuk || The Influencer Platform || Civil society || How much is personal data actually worth, and how high are the stakes of each respective stakeholder in controlling such data? Do ethical considerations matter when it comes to processing of personal data? How posBig Stage (TBC) of data by technology companies reshaped the sustainability of law enforcement? Who is the one to have the final word - the state carrying investigation, or the company entrusted with protection of data? Do technology companies perceive national/regional data regulations as an obstacle for their transborder operations? What mitigation measures do such companies undertake to protect data of their customers, gain their business profits, and comply with the state legislative requirements? || Both
| 136 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || Olga Kyryliuk || The Influencer Platform || Civil society || How much is personal data actually worth, and how high are the stakes of each respective stakeholder in controlling such data? Do ethical considerations matter when it comes to processing of personal data? How posBig Stage (TBC) of data by technology companies reshaped the sustainability of law enforcement? Who is the one to have the final word - the state carrying investigation, or the company entrusted with protection of data? Do technology companies perceive national/regional data regulations as an obstacle for their transborder operations? What mitigation measures do such companies undertake to protect data of their customers, gain their business profits, and comply with the state legislative requirements? || Both
|- id="prop_139" class="hu-ri"  
|- id="prop_139" class="hu-ri"  
| 139 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre09_20|PRE 9]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || Luc Steinberg || Media Diversity Institute || Civil society || The idea is talk about the ways in which internet governance issues impact media sustainability and diversity. This would include the discussion of some case studies of data protection regimes being misused to silence journalism and other threats to free press from digital regulation. || Both
| 139 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre09_20|PRE 9]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]], [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || Luc Steinberg || Media Diversity Institute || Civil society || The idea is talk about the ways in which internet governance issues impact media sustainability and diversity. This would include the discussion of some case studies of data protection regimes being misused to silence journalism and other threats to free press from digital regulation. || Both
|- id="prop_147" class="hu-ri"  
|- id="prop_147" class="hu-ri"  
| 147 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws08_20|WS 8]] || Eva Stöwe || worbli.io, CAcert.org || Other || In the last years we see a growing need to organize Identity in the digital world. This becomes more relevant with the growth of e-government and big companies like Google and Facebook. At the same time blockchains become more relevant. These new technologies are decentralized by design. The classic approach of centralized controlled identity approaches that is organised and controlled by states has issues to keep up with these developments. Being able to identify people becomes more and more important in a lot of areas. But at the same time laws like GDPR recognize the need to protect the privacy of the individuals. In this context it is important for Europe to discuss how we can organize Identity in a more decentralized world so that the citizens keep control over their own data while also being able to identify others when necessary even cross boarder and maybe even within different networks. || EuroDIG
| 147 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws08_20|WS 8]] || Eva Stöwe || worbli.io, CAcert.org || Other || In the last years we see a growing need to organize Identity in the digital world. This becomes more relevant with the growth of e-government and big companies like Google and Facebook. At the same time blockchains become more relevant. These new technologies are decentralized by design. The classic approach of centralized controlled identity approaches that is organised and controlled by states has issues to keep up with these developments. Being able to identify people becomes more and more important in a lot of areas. But at the same time laws like GDPR recognize the need to protect the privacy of the individuals. In this context it is important for Europe to discuss how we can organize Identity in a more decentralized world so that the citizens keep control over their own data while also being able to identify others when necessary even cross boarder and maybe even within different networks. || EuroDIG
Line 181: Line 181:
| 41 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || Vittorio Bertola || Open-Xchange || Private sector || Legally mandated interoperability to open up the big platforms. The original Internet applications, such as email and the web, were built around open standards and horizontal federations of actors. However, applications of a later generation, such as instant messaging and social networks, have instead been built commercially as closed silos owned by a single company, capturing users in a "walled garden" where they can be monetized as much as possible. This prevents competition and innovation, and reduces choice, security, privacy and freedom for the users. To allow for new entrants and innovative applications to flourish in these fields, the principle of legally mandated interoperability has been proposed: dominant platforms should be required by law to allow other players to interconnect, so that, for example, a new messaging app can exchange messages with all the users of the established ones, removing the barrier of a lack of critical user mass. Is this a valid idea for possible European regulation, and how could it be implemented in practice? || Both
| 41 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || Vittorio Bertola || Open-Xchange || Private sector || Legally mandated interoperability to open up the big platforms. The original Internet applications, such as email and the web, were built around open standards and horizontal federations of actors. However, applications of a later generation, such as instant messaging and social networks, have instead been built commercially as closed silos owned by a single company, capturing users in a "walled garden" where they can be monetized as much as possible. This prevents competition and innovation, and reduces choice, security, privacy and freedom for the users. To allow for new entrants and innovative applications to flourish in these fields, the principle of legally mandated interoperability has been proposed: dominant platforms should be required by law to allow other players to interconnect, so that, for example, a new messaging app can exchange messages with all the users of the established ones, removing the barrier of a lack of critical user mass. Is this a valid idea for possible European regulation, and how could it be implemented in practice? || Both
|- id="prop_44" class="i-a-e"  
|- id="prop_44" class="i-a-e"  
| 44 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Paolo Perucci || Friuli Venezia Giulia autonomous Region || Government || Broadband investment models and demand stimulation initiatives, especially in remote areas. How to maximize the effects of public funds in fostering innovation in rural and mountain villages. || EuroDIG
| 44 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Paolo Perucci || Friuli Venezia Giulia autonomous Region || Government || Broadband investment models and demand stimulation initiatives, especially in remote areas. How to maximize the effects of public funds in fostering innovation in rural and mountain villages. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_52" class="i-a-e"  
|- id="prop_52" class="i-a-e"  
| 52 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws14_20|WS 14]] || Julia Wolman || Danish Business Authority || Government || Data Ethics. Data Ethics is about creating trust in digital technologies. It is essential for the competitiveness and economic development of Europe that our companies are able to innovate and create new technological solutions with European values at the centre. || EuroDIG
| 52 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws14_20|WS 14]] || Julia Wolman || Danish Business Authority || Government || Data Ethics. Data Ethics is about creating trust in digital technologies. It is essential for the competitiveness and economic development of Europe that our companies are able to innovate and create new technological solutions with European values at the centre. || EuroDIG
Line 189: Line 189:
| 65 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl01_20|PL 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]], (double 64) || Ross Creelman || ETNO || Private sector || 5G – will it spur on prosperity in Europe? A greater focus needs to be put on the demand side of 5G, and less on the regulatory: to generate demand, we need to have industry and citizens on board. What policies and initiatives does this require? || EuroDIG
| 65 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl01_20|PL 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]], (double 64) || Ross Creelman || ETNO || Private sector || 5G – will it spur on prosperity in Europe? A greater focus needs to be put on the demand side of 5G, and less on the regulatory: to generate demand, we need to have industry and citizens on board. What policies and initiatives does this require? || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_69" class="i-a-e"  
|- id="prop_69" class="i-a-e"  
| 69 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Tom Puc || The Things Network Community Nova Gorica || Technical community || How can Community Networks spice up their services with open, free access, long range communication for Internet-of-Things || EuroDIG
| 69 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Tom Puc || The Things Network Community Nova Gorica || Technical community || How can Community Networks spice up their services with open, free access, long range communication for Internet-of-Things || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_70" class="i-a-e"  
|- id="prop_70" class="i-a-e"  
| 70 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Carlo Vinga || EUSALP Action Group 5 || Intergovernmental organisation || Benefits of digitisation and innovative models in mountain and peripheral areas (Smart Villages). Alpine space rural communities lack of highly skilled jobs, provision of services as well as a favourable climate for entrepreneurship and social innovation. Results are brain drain, depopulation and loss of job opportunities. Digitisation is a promising approach to counter the situation. However the digital divide between rural and urban areas has even increased in the last years. A specific digitisation approach for mountain areas starting from the concept of smart village (SV) could bring out the potential of local actors to make their region a more attractive place to live and work. || EuroDIG
| 70 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Carlo Vinga || EUSALP Action Group 5 || Intergovernmental organisation || Benefits of digitisation and innovative models in mountain and peripheral areas (Smart Villages). Alpine space rural communities lack of highly skilled jobs, provision of services as well as a favourable climate for entrepreneurship and social innovation. Results are brain drain, depopulation and loss of job opportunities. Digitisation is a promising approach to counter the situation. However the digital divide between rural and urban areas has even increased in the last years. A specific digitisation approach for mountain areas starting from the concept of smart village (SV) could bring out the potential of local actors to make their region a more attractive place to live and work. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_72" class="i-a-e"  
|- id="prop_72" class="i-a-e"  
| 72 || SEEDIG || Vladislava Martin || Individual Expert || Civil society || IT Solutions and Developments for Public Sector || SEEDIG
| 72 || SEEDIG || Vladislava Martin || Individual Expert || Civil society || IT Solutions and Developments for Public Sector || SEEDIG
Line 203: Line 203:
| 85 || Big Stage (TBC) || Catalin Vrabie || National University of Political Studies and Public Administration || Academia || Securing Smart Cities || Both
| 85 || Big Stage (TBC) || Catalin Vrabie || National University of Political Studies and Public Administration || Academia || Securing Smart Cities || Both
|- id="prop_95" class="i-a-e"  
|- id="prop_95" class="i-a-e"  
| 95 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Ramon Roca || guifi.net Foundation || Civil society || Best practices for financing Community Networks towards connecting everyone || EuroDIG
| 95 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Ramon Roca || guifi.net Foundation || Civil society || Best practices for financing Community Networks towards connecting everyone || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_102" class="i-a-e"  
|- id="prop_102" class="i-a-e"  
| 102 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws13_20|WS 13]] || Erklina Denja || Magnific shpk || Private sector || How we can support a sustainable growth of Digital Entrepreneurship in SEE || Both
| 102 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws13_20|WS 13]] || Erklina Denja || Magnific shpk || Private sector || How we can support a sustainable growth of Digital Entrepreneurship in SEE || Both
Line 227: Line 227:
| 179 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || Alexander Isavnin || Internet Protection Society || Civil society || Huge (mostly US and China) internet corporations become real “5th power”. They have possibility for “right to violence” in cyberspace, which can limit “permissionless innovations” or human rights. On the other hand, such “5th power” have ability to promite and protect human rights in authoritarian and hybrid regimes. || EuroDIG
| 179 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || Alexander Isavnin || Internet Protection Society || Civil society || Huge (mostly US and China) internet corporations become real “5th power”. They have possibility for “right to violence” in cyberspace, which can limit “permissionless innovations” or human rights. On the other hand, such “5th power” have ability to promite and protect human rights in authoritarian and hybrid regimes. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_4" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_4" class="m-a-c"  
| 4 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Elena Perotti || WAN-IFRA World Association of News Publishers || Press || Is the copyright directive a solution for media sustainability? What are the implications for the stakeholders of the Internet ecosystem, from the content creators, to the platforms, to the users? What extra-regional effects is it likely to produce?  || EuroDIG
| 4 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]] || Elena Perotti || WAN-IFRA World Association of News Publishers || Press || Is the copyright directive a solution for media sustainability? What are the implications for the stakeholders of the Internet ecosystem, from the content creators, to the platforms, to the users? What extra-regional effects is it likely to produce?  || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_5" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_5" class="m-a-c"  
| 5 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Daly Hamady Diallo || Forum sur la Gouvernance de l'Internet au Mali  (FGI Mali ) || Civil society || La radicalisation et l'extrémisme violent en ligne : Que faire?  || Both
| 5 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Daly Hamady Diallo || Forum sur la Gouvernance de l'Internet au Mali  (FGI Mali ) || Civil society || La radicalisation et l'extrémisme violent en ligne : Que faire?  || Both
|- id="prop_9" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_9" class="m-a-c"  
| 9 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre10_20|PRE 10]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Alessandro Picarone || Università degli Studi di Napoli, Federico II || Civil society || The topic I suggest is that of the relationship between minors and social media: in fact, the presence of under-18s on the Internet and on social media is increasingly widespread, and this can lead to some problems for their security and privacy. || EuroDIG
| 9 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre10_20|PRE 10]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Alessandro Picarone || Università degli Studi di Napoli, Federico II || Civil society || The topic I suggest is that of the relationship between minors and social media: in fact, the presence of under-18s on the Internet and on social media is increasingly widespread, and this can lead to some problems for their security and privacy. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_12" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_12" class="m-a-c"  
| 12 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Anna Romandash || SEEDIG || Civil society || Regulatory policies & their impact on the media landscape in SEE region: how Internet regulators influence investigators, whistleblowers, and how lack of clear rules of the games challenges journalists || Both
| 12 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Anna Romandash || SEEDIG || Civil society || Regulatory policies & their impact on the media landscape in SEE region: how Internet regulators influence investigators, whistleblowers, and how lack of clear rules of the games challenges journalists || Both
|- id="prop_16" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_16" class="m-a-c"  
| 16 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Nadia Tjahja || Sunium || Other || Content & Cognitive bias: When we address the information disorder, we look at the outputs, but I would like to propose at looking how mental models influence the manner in which we engage with creating or understanding information that we encounter online. This intersects with access & literacy and hate speech. || EuroDIG
| 16 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Nadia Tjahja || Sunium || Other || Content & Cognitive bias: When we address the information disorder, we look at the outputs, but I would like to propose at looking how mental models influence the manner in which we engage with creating or understanding information that we encounter online. This intersects with access & literacy and hate speech. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_18" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_18" class="m-a-c"  
| 18 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Yeseul Kim || APSIG || Civil society || Digital Humanities || EuroDIG
| 18 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Yeseul Kim || APSIG || Civil society || Digital Humanities || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_20" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_20" class="m-a-c"  
| 20 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Nadia Tjahja || Sunium || Private sector || Regulations development on the duty of care in relation to d/misinformation || EuroDIG
| 20 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Nadia Tjahja || Sunium || Private sector || Regulations development on the duty of care in relation to d/misinformation || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_28" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_28" class="m-a-c"  
| 28 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Nertil Berdufi || Beder University College || Academia || Fake news and online freedom of expression. On 26 November 2019 Albania was hit by a 6.4 earthquake which cased devastating effects to the country. During these days one individual was arrested for "causing public panic" with her facebook status on the situation post-earthquake which was deemed to be fake news. Later on, due to a number of fake news, the prime minister, in a public speech, declared that he would shut down all media who produce fake news on such a devastating situation. After a couple of hours, an online news portal was shut down, but their facebook portal, which cannot be closed by Albanian authorities remains open. In this portal they declared to report nothing but the truth and they claim their right to freedom of expression and media freedom. With fake news becoming so popular in the region, I  think this is an important issue to be discussed in a multistakeholder environment such as SEEDIG and EuroDIG. Should the government or any other stakeholder have the power to shut down online portals or to arrest individuals for exercising their freedom of expression, even in cases related to natural disasters, or other sensitive issues which spread massive panic to the citizens? Is it better to have no news rather than fake news or biased opinions? Where does the online freedom of expression stand in these cases? || Both
| 28 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Nertil Berdufi || Beder University College || Academia || Fake news and online freedom of expression. On 26 November 2019 Albania was hit by a 6.4 earthquake which cased devastating effects to the country. During these days one individual was arrested for "causing public panic" with her facebook status on the situation post-earthquake which was deemed to be fake news. Later on, due to a number of fake news, the prime minister, in a public speech, declared that he would shut down all media who produce fake news on such a devastating situation. After a couple of hours, an online news portal was shut down, but their facebook portal, which cannot be closed by Albanian authorities remains open. In this portal they declared to report nothing but the truth and they claim their right to freedom of expression and media freedom. With fake news becoming so popular in the region, I  think this is an important issue to be discussed in a multistakeholder environment such as SEEDIG and EuroDIG. Should the government or any other stakeholder have the power to shut down online portals or to arrest individuals for exercising their freedom of expression, even in cases related to natural disasters, or other sensitive issues which spread massive panic to the citizens? Is it better to have no news rather than fake news or biased opinions? Where does the online freedom of expression stand in these cases? || Both
|- id="prop_37" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_37" class="m-a-c"  
| 37 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Katarina Gevorgyan || Other || Private sector || How are the people in 50+ age protected from fake news in any portals? || Both
| 37 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Katarina Gevorgyan || Other || Private sector || How are the people in 50+ age protected from fake news in any portals? || Both
|- id="prop_56" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_56" class="m-a-c"  
| 56 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre01_20|PRE 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Carola Croll || Digital Opportunities Foundation || Civil society || How does the use of Social Media shape the achievements of civil society movements, such as #metoo, Fridays for Future etc.? What are the factors for their large scale success? How can they help attain the 17 SDGs? What are the risks and chances of mass movements for democratic societies? || EuroDIG
| 56 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre01_20|PRE 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Carola Croll || Digital Opportunities Foundation || Civil society || How does the use of Social Media shape the achievements of civil society movements, such as #metoo, Fridays for Future etc.? What are the factors for their large scale success? How can they help attain the 17 SDGs? What are the risks and chances of mass movements for democratic societies? || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_77" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_77" class="m-a-c"  
| 77 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], Big Stage (TBC) || Claire Local || Ofcom - UK || Other || What are the next steps for regulating targeted political advertising online? || EuroDIG
| 77 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]], Big Stage (TBC) || Claire Local || Ofcom - UK || Other || What are the next steps for regulating targeted political advertising online? || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_84" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_84" class="m-a-c"  
| 84 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Stephen Wyber || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || EuroDIG 2020 will take place with less than a year to go until the European Union's copyright directive needs to be implemented nationally. Countries in the European Economic Area, as well as aspirant Member States will also need to incorporate it into national law. So how's it going? What issues are coming up? How are governments interpreting what's in there, and what might it mean for the internet? What issues are arising, and require further reflection? || Both
| 84 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]] || Stephen Wyber || International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions || Civil society || EuroDIG 2020 will take place with less than a year to go until the European Union's copyright directive needs to be implemented nationally. Countries in the European Economic Area, as well as aspirant Member States will also need to incorporate it into national law. So how's it going? What issues are coming up? How are governments interpreting what's in there, and what might it mean for the internet? What issues are arising, and require further reflection? || Both
|- id="prop_90" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_90" class="m-a-c"  
| 90 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], Big Stage (TBC) || Fulvia Abbondante || University of Naples || Academia || Deep fake: the new challenge for the democracy || EuroDIG
| 90 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]], Big Stage (TBC) || Fulvia Abbondante || University of Naples || Academia || Deep fake: the new challenge for the democracy || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_99" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_99" class="m-a-c"  
| 99 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Oliana Sula  || University "Aleksander Mosiu" Durres/Estonian Bsuiness School  || Academia || Proposed Issue: online social networks and sustainable content- are they going hand to hand?  Relevance of issue: are online social networks accomodating and providing an accurate space of sustainable content?  || Both
| 99 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Oliana Sula  || University "Aleksander Mosiu" Durres/Estonian Bsuiness School  || Academia || Proposed Issue: online social networks and sustainable content- are they going hand to hand?  Relevance of issue: are online social networks accomodating and providing an accurate space of sustainable content?  || Both
|- id="prop_110" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_110" class="m-a-c"  
| 110 || Big Stage (TBC) || MARIANA ROSCA || University of Deusto || Academia || Issue: Internet and diaspora communities. The issue proposed is relevant due to the fact that many European and South-Eastern European countries are affected by the migration phenomenon. Some are countries of origin, some of destination and some of transition. Regardless of the role played in the migration process; the phenomenon had and will continue to influence the economic, political and social realm of both countries of origin as well as the destination. A central role in this process is played by the Internet. Migrants and diaspora communities are using the Internet and online spaces not only to keep in contact with their country of origin and access information but also are actively involved to create media content and debate the information. Additionally, it had become a space to establish online platforms for political mobilization, for awareness-raising campaigns, for exchange of information and transformation as well as misinformation. Thus, the current issue proposes to debate both the positive and negative internet use by migrants and diaspora communities.  || Both
| 110 || Big Stage (TBC) || MARIANA ROSCA || University of Deusto || Academia || Issue: Internet and diaspora communities. The issue proposed is relevant due to the fact that many European and South-Eastern European countries are affected by the migration phenomenon. Some are countries of origin, some of destination and some of transition. Regardless of the role played in the migration process; the phenomenon had and will continue to influence the economic, political and social realm of both countries of origin as well as the destination. A central role in this process is played by the Internet. Migrants and diaspora communities are using the Internet and online spaces not only to keep in contact with their country of origin and access information but also are actively involved to create media content and debate the information. Additionally, it had become a space to establish online platforms for political mobilization, for awareness-raising campaigns, for exchange of information and transformation as well as misinformation. Thus, the current issue proposes to debate both the positive and negative internet use by migrants and diaspora communities.  || Both
|- id="prop_112" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_112" class="m-a-c"  
| 112 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Bissera Zankova || Media 21 Foundation, Bulgaria || Civil society || Social media and convergence - COMPACT - the holistic approach. So far convergence has been approached from various perspectives in an isolated manner, with the technological focus prevailing. A holistic treatment of the features of convergence (including its technological, economic, policy and socio-cultural aspects) and how they impact the evolution of social media is undoubtedly a desirable goal. The pursuit of this precise goal represents the main aim of the EU COMPACT project. This approach is visible in the comprehensive analysis of the problems of a variety of fields amalgamated to produce the overall content. The accomplishment of this ambitious effort on the multidisciplinary character of convergence and social media is strongly supported by our team comprised of a bouquet of specialists with diverse backgrounds and interests. || Both
| 112 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Bissera Zankova || Media 21 Foundation, Bulgaria || Civil society || Social media and convergence - COMPACT - the holistic approach. So far convergence has been approached from various perspectives in an isolated manner, with the technological focus prevailing. A holistic treatment of the features of convergence (including its technological, economic, policy and socio-cultural aspects) and how they impact the evolution of social media is undoubtedly a desirable goal. The pursuit of this precise goal represents the main aim of the EU COMPACT project. This approach is visible in the comprehensive analysis of the problems of a variety of fields amalgamated to produce the overall content. The accomplishment of this ambitious effort on the multidisciplinary character of convergence and social media is strongly supported by our team comprised of a bouquet of specialists with diverse backgrounds and interests. || Both
|- id="prop_113" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_113" class="m-a-c"  
| 113 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] (double 112) || Bissera Zankova || Media 21 Foundation, Bulgaria || Civil society || Social media and convergence - COMPACT - the holistic approach. So far convergence has been approached from various perspectives in an isolated manner, with the technological focus prevailing. A holistic treatment of the features of convergence (including its technological, economic, policy and socio-cultural aspects) and how they impact the evolution of social media is undoubtedly a desirable goal. The pursuit of this precise goal represents the main aim of the EU COMPACT project. This approach is visible in the comprehensive analysis of the problems of a variety of fields amalgamated to produce the overall content. The accomplishment of this ambitious effort on the multidisciplinary character of convergence and social media is strongly supported by our team comprised of a bouquet of specialists with diverse backgrounds and interests. || Both
| 113 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] (double 112) || Bissera Zankova || Media 21 Foundation, Bulgaria || Civil society || Social media and convergence - COMPACT - the holistic approach. So far convergence has been approached from various perspectives in an isolated manner, with the technological focus prevailing. A holistic treatment of the features of convergence (including its technological, economic, policy and socio-cultural aspects) and how they impact the evolution of social media is undoubtedly a desirable goal. The pursuit of this precise goal represents the main aim of the EU COMPACT project. This approach is visible in the comprehensive analysis of the problems of a variety of fields amalgamated to produce the overall content. The accomplishment of this ambitious effort on the multidisciplinary character of convergence and social media is strongly supported by our team comprised of a bouquet of specialists with diverse backgrounds and interests. || Both
|- id="prop_125" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_125" class="m-a-c"  
| 125 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Valeriia Dubytska  || iNGO European Media Platform  || Civil society || Is disinformation equal to fake news? How and by whom should it be regulated (or not)? || Both
| 125 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Valeriia Dubytska  || iNGO European Media Platform  || Civil society || Is disinformation equal to fake news? How and by whom should it be regulated (or not)? || Both
|- id="prop_141" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_141" class="m-a-c"  
| 141 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws16_20|WS 16]] || Luc Steinberg || 23/09/1981 || Civil society || The potential impact of the Copyright Directive on media pluralism || EuroDIG
| 141 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws01_20|WS 1]] || Luc Steinberg || 23/09/1981 || Civil society || The potential impact of the Copyright Directive on media pluralism || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_171" class="m-a-c"  
|- id="prop_171" class="m-a-c"  
| 171 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre10_20|PRE 10]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Ayca Atabey || İstanbul Bilgi University IT Law Institute  || Academia || Online child abuse and content management in online platforms are relevant globally not only in Europe and/or Southern Europe because children are our future and they are increasingly more threats they are facing.  || Both
| 171 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pre10_20|PRE 10]], [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]] || Ayca Atabey || İstanbul Bilgi University IT Law Institute  || Academia || Online child abuse and content management in online platforms are relevant globally not only in Europe and/or Southern Europe because children are our future and they are increasingly more threats they are facing.  || Both
Line 289: Line 289:
| 162 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws08_20|WS 8]], Big Stage (TBC) || Dorett Bothmann || Managing Data in a European cooperative and an open-sourced and decentralised software solution || Private sector || polypoly is a completely new approach, based on a decentralised data storage system, that’s controlled by the respective user. polypoly is an open structure on which any new and old services can be based, with the aim of creating a fair, transparent, and socially meaningful use of data. polypoly reconciles data protection, property rights, and economic interests, while shattering the supremacy of existing data monopolists. In addition to the already operating polypoly GmbH, which represents and bundles the interests of businesses via a participation and co-operation model, a separate co-operative is being set up. Users will automatically receive a share by installing the polypoly software, enabling the user to participate directly in our economic success. This model ensures data capital flows back into the European market. We want to build the public utility for data with a solid business model. No exit story, no hockey stick growth, no new internet billionaire. We’re committed to our users and businesses alike. || EuroDIG
| 162 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws08_20|WS 8]], Big Stage (TBC) || Dorett Bothmann || Managing Data in a European cooperative and an open-sourced and decentralised software solution || Private sector || polypoly is a completely new approach, based on a decentralised data storage system, that’s controlled by the respective user. polypoly is an open structure on which any new and old services can be based, with the aim of creating a fair, transparent, and socially meaningful use of data. polypoly reconciles data protection, property rights, and economic interests, while shattering the supremacy of existing data monopolists. In addition to the already operating polypoly GmbH, which represents and bundles the interests of businesses via a participation and co-operation model, a separate co-operative is being set up. Users will automatically receive a share by installing the polypoly software, enabling the user to participate directly in our economic success. This model ensures data capital flows back into the European market. We want to build the public utility for data with a solid business model. No exit story, no hockey stick growth, no new internet billionaire. We’re committed to our users and businesses alike. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_167" class="c-c-o"  
|- id="prop_167" class="c-c-o"  
| 167 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || Valentina Scialpi || European Commission || Intergovernmental organisation || Socio-economic strand: Platform/intermediary liability; || EuroDIG
| 167 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]], [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || Valentina Scialpi || European Commission || Intergovernmental organisation || Socio-economic strand: Platform/intermediary liability; || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_168" class="c-c-o"  
|- id="prop_168" class="c-c-o"  
| 168 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl01_20|PL 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#pl02_20|PL 2]] || Valentina Scialpi || European Commission || Intergovernmental organisation || Technological/infrastructure strand: 5g and digital sovereignty || EuroDIG
| 168 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl01_20|PL 1]], [[Draft_programme_2020#pl02_20|PL 2]] || Valentina Scialpi || European Commission || Intergovernmental organisation || Technological/infrastructure strand: 5g and digital sovereignty || EuroDIG
Line 301: Line 301:
| 17 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]], Big Stage (TBC) || Rui Esteves || Área Metropolitana do Porto and Internet Society Portuguese Chapter || Government || Cybersecurity Classrooms for Kids || EuroDIG
| 17 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws10_20|WS 10]], Big Stage (TBC) || Rui Esteves || Área Metropolitana do Porto and Internet Society Portuguese Chapter || Government || Cybersecurity Classrooms for Kids || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_34" class="s-a-c"  
|- id="prop_34" class="s-a-c"  
| 34 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]] || Sabrina Vorbau || European Schoolnet/Insafe || Civil society || Online hate speech is a global issue that has no borders and can only be tackled following a multi-stakeholder approach. Hence, this issue absolutely needs to be discussed at European and regional level. || Both
| 34 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]] || Sabrina Vorbau || European Schoolnet/Insafe || Civil society || Online hate speech is a global issue that has no borders and can only be tackled following a multi-stakeholder approach. Hence, this issue absolutely needs to be discussed at European and regional level. || Both
|- id="prop_46" class="s-a-c"  
|- id="prop_46" class="s-a-c"  
| 46 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws07_20|WS 7]] || Giorgi Jokhadze || Council of Europe, Cybercrime Programme Office || Intergovernmental organisation || International regulations on cybercrime: controlling cybercrime or state control over cyberspace? / While the Council of Europe is negotiating a Second Additional Protocol to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime to permit a more efficient criminal justice response to cybercrime with the necessary rule of law safeguards and while the European Union is developing an E-evidence package proposals have also been made to develop a new international treaty on cybercrime at the level of the United Nations. A resolution to this effect has been brought before the UN General Assembly in September 2019 by the Russian Federation with the support of China, North Korea, Azerbaijan, Belarus and others and is expected to be voted in December 2019. Concerns have been raised by also by civil society organisations that this may lead to restrictions to freedom of speech and other rights and be aimed at stronger control by States over cyberspace and not necessarily at more effective cooperation on cybercrime. EURODIG would be the right multi-stakeholder forum to discuss this matter. || EuroDIG
| 46 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws07_20|WS 7]] || Giorgi Jokhadze || Council of Europe, Cybercrime Programme Office || Intergovernmental organisation || International regulations on cybercrime: controlling cybercrime or state control over cyberspace? / While the Council of Europe is negotiating a Second Additional Protocol to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime to permit a more efficient criminal justice response to cybercrime with the necessary rule of law safeguards and while the European Union is developing an E-evidence package proposals have also been made to develop a new international treaty on cybercrime at the level of the United Nations. A resolution to this effect has been brought before the UN General Assembly in September 2019 by the Russian Federation with the support of China, North Korea, Azerbaijan, Belarus and others and is expected to be voted in December 2019. Concerns have been raised by also by civil society organisations that this may lead to restrictions to freedom of speech and other rights and be aimed at stronger control by States over cyberspace and not necessarily at more effective cooperation on cybercrime. EURODIG would be the right multi-stakeholder forum to discuss this matter. || EuroDIG
Line 323: Line 323:
| 105 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl01_20|PL 1]] || Fotjon Kosta || Albania IGF || Government || How 5G development can improve cybersecurtity on networks/infrastructures, technologies and services development || Both
| 105 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl01_20|PL 1]] || Fotjon Kosta || Albania IGF || Government || How 5G development can improve cybersecurtity on networks/infrastructures, technologies and services development || Both
|- id="prop_108" class="s-a-c"  
|- id="prop_108" class="s-a-c"  
| 108 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || André Melancia || Independent || Civil society || Online extreme right wing hatred, cyber bullying, fake news and lack of proper policing/enforcing by social networks: How can we reduce these issues, including how to force social networks to enforce effective answers to issue reporting by users. || EuroDIG
| 108 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]], [[Draft_programme_2020#pl03_20|PL 3]] || André Melancia || Independent || Civil society || Online extreme right wing hatred, cyber bullying, fake news and lack of proper policing/enforcing by social networks: How can we reduce these issues, including how to force social networks to enforce effective answers to issue reporting by users. || EuroDIG
|- id="prop_122" class="s-a-c"  
|- id="prop_122" class="s-a-c"  
| 122 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws13_20|WS 13]] || Oksana Prykhodko || iNGO European Media Platform || Civil society || How to measure efficiency of EU assistance on cybersecurity issues to non-EU countries - we have cyber war in the heart of Europe, we have a lot of threats and cyberchallenges, we do not have common strategy how to deal with such threats and challenges. , what metrics should be used, how to improve cyber support programs for Ukraine. how to measure efficient of EU cyber programs, what metrics should be used, how to improve cyber support programs for Ukraine?how to measure efficient of EU cyber programs, what metrics should be used, how to improve cyber support programs for Ukraine? || Both
| 122 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws13_20|WS 13]] || Oksana Prykhodko || iNGO European Media Platform || Civil society || How to measure efficiency of EU assistance on cybersecurity issues to non-EU countries - we have cyber war in the heart of Europe, we have a lot of threats and cyberchallenges, we do not have common strategy how to deal with such threats and challenges. , what metrics should be used, how to improve cyber support programs for Ukraine. how to measure efficient of EU cyber programs, what metrics should be used, how to improve cyber support programs for Ukraine?how to measure efficient of EU cyber programs, what metrics should be used, how to improve cyber support programs for Ukraine? || Both
Line 391: Line 391:
| 184 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl01_20|PL 1]] || Gianfranco Pensili || Ministry of Economic Development, Italy || Government || 5G and cyber Security - national cybersecurity strategies towards a European Coordinated Plan The Ministry of Economic Development (MISE) has established at DGTCSI-ISCTI the National Evaluation and Certification Centre (CVCN) for the verification of security conditions and the absence of vulnerabilities of products, equipment and systems intended to be used for the operation of strategic networks, services and infrastructures, as well as any other operator performing functions which are essential for national security. This is one of the qualifying actions for the construction of the national cybersecurity architecture that will integrate, at national level, the provisions of the Cybersecurity Act. || EuroDIG at planning meeting
| 184 || [[Draft_programme_2020#pl01_20|PL 1]] || Gianfranco Pensili || Ministry of Economic Development, Italy || Government || 5G and cyber Security - national cybersecurity strategies towards a European Coordinated Plan The Ministry of Economic Development (MISE) has established at DGTCSI-ISCTI the National Evaluation and Certification Centre (CVCN) for the verification of security conditions and the absence of vulnerabilities of products, equipment and systems intended to be used for the operation of strategic networks, services and infrastructures, as well as any other operator performing functions which are essential for national security. This is one of the qualifying actions for the construction of the national cybersecurity architecture that will integrate, at national level, the provisions of the Cybersecurity Act. || EuroDIG at planning meeting
|- id="prop_186" class="s-a-c"  
|- id="prop_186" class="s-a-c"  
| 186 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws12_20|WS 12]], Big Stage (TBC) || Jim Prendergast || The Galway Strategy Group || Other || As part of our efforts to prevent terrorists and violent extremists from exploiting digital platforms, the Global Internet Forum for Counter Terrorism (GIFCT) is committed to engaging with the community.  Sustaining and deepening industry collaboration and capacity, while incorporating the advice of key civil society and government stakeholders is critical to success and EuroDIG presents a key opportunity to achieve this. || EuroDIG during programme review phase
| 186 || [[Draft_programme_2020#ws06_20|WS 6]], Big Stage (TBC) || Jim Prendergast || The Galway Strategy Group || Other || As part of our efforts to prevent terrorists and violent extremists from exploiting digital platforms, the Global Internet Forum for Counter Terrorism (GIFCT) is committed to engaging with the community.  Sustaining and deepening industry collaboration and capacity, while incorporating the advice of key civil society and government stakeholders is critical to success and EuroDIG presents a key opportunity to achieve this. || EuroDIG during programme review phase
|}
|}

Revision as of 14:38, 16 February 2020

During the period from 1 October – 8 December 2019 we received 179 submissions in the joint call for issues for the EuroDIG and SEEDIG 2020 programme planning. You can find the breakdown here.

Categories are colored as follows:

 Access & literacy   Development of IG ecosystem   Human rights & data protection   Innovation and economic issues   Media & content   Cross cutting / other issues   Security and crime   Technical & operational issues 

You may sort the table by clicking at head of the column. To restore the original sorting, just reload the page.

You can also download the list of proposals as of 14 Dec. 2019 as pdf file.

Proposals submitted during the Planning Meeting / programme review phase