Talk:Surveillance, laws and governments vs. Internet rights – WS 07 2018: Difference between revisions
AlexanderI (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{| |- | 8 | Olga Kyryliuk | NGO “Digital Defenders Partners” | Internet freedom: at the edge of liberty and security |- | 137 | Nata Goderdzishvili | Data Exchang...") |
AlexanderI (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| "We need to put it under control": How both Europe and oppressive states claim the same rights on regulate Internet content | | "We need to put it under control": How both Europe and oppressive states claim the same rights on regulate Internet content | ||
|} | |} | ||
* Description | |||
** Proposed by SME | |||
The session can be a debate format: Among the Internet community, some are of the opinion that government actions and regulation usually hamper our internet rights and the fundamental principles of the Internet such as interoperability and openness. Some others believe that efforts such as data localization, legitimation of third-party platform content regulation and even surveillance and protectionism serve our rights and are here to protect us. And there are those who believe that there can be a genuine balance: good regulations that can enhance our Internet rights while respecting the Internet longstanding principles. We will be debating these issues during this session to provide a landscape of opinions about how government regulations positively or negatively affect our rights. | |||
Revision as of 10:14, 8 May 2018
| 8 | Olga Kyryliuk | NGO “Digital Defenders Partners” | Internet freedom: at the edge of liberty and security |
| 137 | Nata Goderdzishvili | Data Exchange Agency | Building sustainable balance of individual privacy and state security considering GDPR and NIS regulations |
| 156 | Alexander Isavnin | RosKomSvoboda | Development of IG ecosystem Government interverence to technical infrustructure of Internet, affecting not just network performance, but also human rights. |
| 162 | Olga Kyryliuk | NGO “Digital Defenders Partners” | State surveillance online |
| 190 | Laurin Weissinger | University of Oxford Academia | How can the fight against abuse (e.g. crime) be balanced with citizens' rights and expectations of privacy online? |
| 214 | Giorgi Kldiashvili | Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI) | Surveillance in the Digital Age and the Importance of Transparency and Public Trust |
| 223 | Eduardo Santos | D3 ‐ Defesa dos Direitos Digitais | "We need to put it under control": How both Europe and oppressive states claim the same rights on regulate Internet content |
- Description
- Proposed by SME
The session can be a debate format: Among the Internet community, some are of the opinion that government actions and regulation usually hamper our internet rights and the fundamental principles of the Internet such as interoperability and openness. Some others believe that efforts such as data localization, legitimation of third-party platform content regulation and even surveillance and protectionism serve our rights and are here to protect us. And there are those who believe that there can be a genuine balance: good regulations that can enhance our Internet rights while respecting the Internet longstanding principles. We will be debating these issues during this session to provide a landscape of opinions about how government regulations positively or negatively affect our rights.