The IANA stewardship transition: a test case for Internet governance? – PL 04 2015: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
An overview of the IANA stewardship transition processes to date, and a discussion of their broader implications for future multistakeholder approaches to Internet governance and the global political Internet governance landscape.
A year into the IANA stewardship transition: an update on the ongoing process and its effects on European and global multistakeholder Internet governance discussions.


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  

Revision as of 09:59, 14 April 2015

Session teaser

A year into the IANA stewardship transition: an update on the ongoing process and its effects on European and global multistakeholder Internet governance discussions.

Session description

Deadline 30. April 2015

Keywords

IANA, governance, multistakeholder, WSIS+10, bottom-up, accountability

Format

Deadline 30. April 2015

Further reading

Deadline 30. April 2015

People

  • Focal Point: Chris Buckridge
  • Org team: Andrea Beccalli, Konstantinos Komaitis, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Walid Al-Saqaf, William Drake, Anna Kakalashvili
  • Key participants|Panelists: (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
  • Moderator: (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
  • Reporter: (deadline 15. Mai 2015)
  • Remote moderator: (deadline 15. Mai 2015)

Conf. call schedule & minutes

PL4 Org Team Teleconference, 9 April 2015

Participants: Andrea Beccalli, Chris Buckridge, William Drake, Athina Fragkouli, Anna Kakalashvili, Konstantinos Komaitis

The first call of the PL4 organising team was held on 9 April, and these discussions produced loose agreement on a format for the 90-minute session that breaks into three distinct segments:

  1. info sharing on what's going on, top level, re. the IANA stewardship process
  2. discussion of the multistakeholder process and its generalizable implications, and then
  3. a link to the broader geopolitics of 'oversight', WSIS+10 and global Internet governance generally

The current approach is to have 2-3 “focus” speakers for each of those segments (with the moderator leading discussion in an interview-style format) and reserving time for audience discussion between each segment (though it was noted that this would require some quite strong, pro-active moderation).

On a related note, we discussed the possibility of Konstantinos Komaitis moderating the session (at this initial stage he was open to the possibility). Other tentative suggestions for speakers included Matthew Shears (Centre for Technology and Democracy, civil society) and someone from the European Commission (or EU more generally... perhaps an MEP?).

The group on the call discussed the teaser sentence and key words, both of which need to be updated on the wiki by 10 April. General consensus was reached on these, and they are now reflected on the wiki.

We will endeavour to schedule a second call during the week of 27 April-1 May (a Doodle poll will be made available shortly). This actually fits quite nicely with our next “deadline” for content, which is 30 April.

Notes taken by Chris Buckridge

Current discussion

See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page

Mailing list

Contact: pl4@eurodig.org

Live stream / remote participation

Final report

Session twitter hashtag

Hashtag: #eurodigp4