Internet Standards and Frontier Technologies: Lessons from the Past, Tasks for Today, Choices for the Future – WS 05 2026: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "27 May 2026 | 14:30 - 15:30 CEST | Room A <br /> '''Draft programme 2026 overview / 27 May'''<br /><br /> {{Sessionadvice-WS-2026}} Working title: <big>'''The Role of High and Frontier Technologies and Standards Setting for the Future of the Internet'''</big><br /> Proposals:<br /><br /> == <span class="dateline">Get involved!</span> == You are invited to become a member of the Session Org Team by simply subscribing to the [https://list..."
 
RosicS (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
27 May 2026 | 14:30 - 15:30 CEST | Room A <br />
27 May 2026 | 14:30 - 15:30 CEST | LORD JENKINS<br />
[[Draft_programme_2026#27may_26|'''Draft programme 2026 overview / 27 May''']]<br /><br />
[[Consolidated_programme_2026#ws05_26|'''Consolidated programme 2026''']]<br /><br />
{{Sessionadvice-WS-2026}}
Proposals: #17, #46, #47<br /><br />
Working title: <big>'''The Role of High and Frontier Technologies and Standards Setting for the Future of the Internet'''</big><br />
Proposals:<br /><br />
== <span class="dateline">Get involved!</span> ==  
== <span class="dateline">Get involved!</span> ==  
You are invited to become a member of the Session Org Team by simply subscribing to the [https://list.eurodig.org/mailman/listinfo/ws05_2026 '''mailing list''']. By doing so, you agree that your name and affiliation will be published at the relevant session wiki page. Please reply to the email send to you to confirm your subscription.
You are invited to become a member of the Session Org Team by simply subscribing to the [https://list.eurodig.org/mailman/listinfo/ws05_2026 '''mailing list''']. By doing so, you agree that your name and affiliation will be published at the relevant session wiki page. Please reply to the email send to you to confirm your subscription.
Line 12: Line 10:


== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
1-2 lines describing the focus of the session; will be provided by the Programme Committee.  
Starting from a review of Internet standards, this session examines how open standards can help deliver the Internet we want: resilient, secure, interoperable and inclusive, especially in a time of rapid technological and political change.
 
As debates on the future of Internet governance continue beyond WSIS+20, one question is becoming increasingly urgent: how do we preserve an open, secure and interoperable Internet while integrating new and more complex technologies?
 
The Internet’s success has long depended on open standards developed in multistakeholder processes and adopted across networks on a voluntary basis. This model enabled innovation, resilience and global interoperability. But today, the deployment of more complex, automation-dependent and sometimes non-backwards-compatible technologies is putting that model under pressure. At the same time, policymakers are taking a growing interest in standards-setting, while technologies such as AI, quantum computing and other frontier innovations are reshaping the technical and political environment in which the Internet evolves.


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  
Always use your own words to describe the session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.
This session asks what we can learn from the Internet’s own history to guide the next phase of technological governance. It looks at the gap between standards development and standards deployment; the economics of adoption, including first-mover disadvantage; and the roles of governments, the technical community, the private sector and civil society in turning open standards into operational reality.
 
Bringing together technical and non-technical perspectives in the Brussels policy context, the session will explore how multistakeholder cooperation can help align public objectives and technical feasibility - and how standards can remain a practical tool for building the Internet we want.


== Format ==  
== Format ==  
Please try out new interactive formats. EuroDIG is about dialogue not about statements, presentations and speeches. Workshops should not be organised as a small plenary.
This workshop will start with inputs from key participants and be structured around four key questions:
 
'''(1) Success stories:''' What lessons from the Internet’s early governance and standards-setting model still matter today?
 
'''(2) Reality check:''' What are the main barriers to legitimate and effective standards-setting and uptake today (technical complexity, deployment challenges, weak incentives, or lack of coordination) and how can they be addressed?
 
'''(3) Inclusion and multistakeholder approaches''': How can we ensure that all stakeholders are included and that standards are developed fairly and in a spirit of solidarity and inclusion? 
 
'''(4) Future readiness:''' How should policymakers, the technical community, and other stakeholders work together on Internet standards in the age of AI, quantum and other frontier technologies, without undermining the Open Internet?


== Further reading ==  
== Further reading ==  
Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. Example for an external link: [http://www.eurodig.org/ Main page of EuroDIG]
Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. Example for an external link: [http://www.eurodig.org/ Main page of EuroDIG]
Recommended readings for '''Theme 1''':
*Why Effective Digital Governance Begins with Understanding the Internet Itself: https://labs.ripe.net/author/hisham_ibrahim/why-effective-digital-governance-begins-with-understanding-the-internet-itself/
*Distinguishing the Internet’s Core From What Is Built on Top https://labs.ripe.net/author/hisham_ibrahim/distinguishing-the-internets-core-from-what-is-built-on-top/
*Schrödinger’s IPv6 Cat https://labs.ripe.net/author/hisham_ibrahim/schrodingers-ipv6-cat/
Recommended readings for '''Theme 3''':
*Malcolm, J. (2015). Criteria of meaningful stakeholder inclusion in internet governance. Internet Policy Review, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2015.4.391
*Frei, N. (2021). Equality as a principle of the networked world? an exploratory search for ‘cyber-equality’ in the field of internet governance. Zeitschrift Für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht Und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 81(3), 627–650. https://doi.org/10.17104/0044-2348-2021-3-627
*Weber, R. H. (2015). Principles for governing the Internet: A comparative analysis. UNESCO Publishing. https://books.google.rs/books?id=6LHHCgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA3&ots=HlWSWGYPDM&lr&hl=sr&pg=PA24#v=onepage&q&f=false
*Raboy, M., Landry, N., & Shtern, J. (2010). Digital solidarities, communication policy and multi-stakeholder global governance: The legacy of the World Summit on the Information Society. Peter Lang. https://books.google.rs/books?id=TeFXwzvc7agC&lr=&hl=sr&source=gbs_navlinks_s
*ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee. (2024). DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Record Automation (SAC126). Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/security-and-stability-advisory-committee-ssac-reports/sac-126-16-08-2024-en.pdf


== People ==  
== People ==  
''Please provide the name and affiliation/institution of all people you list here like this:''
*First Name Last Name, Affiliation/institution


'''Programme Committee member(s)'''  
'''Programme Committee member(s)'''  
 
*Milica Vesović, Programme Manager in the Digital Development Unit, Directorate of Security, Integrity and Rule of Law at the Council of Europe
The Programme Committee (PC) supports the programme planning process throughout the year and works closely with the Secretariat. Members of the PC give advice on the topics, cluster the proposals and assist session organisers in their work. They also ensure that session principles are followed and monitor the complete programme to avoid repetition. 1-2 PC members have signed up to each session and  will compile the messages.
*Filip Lukáš, Policy Advisor at CENTR
*Regina Filipová Fuchsová, Industry Relations Manager at EURid
The [https://www.eurodig.org/get-involved/planning-process/#tab-programme-planning Programme Committee] (PC) supports the programme planning process throughout the year and works closely with the Secretariat. Members of the PC give advice on the topics, cluster the proposals and assist session organisers in their work. They also ensure that session principles are followed and monitor the complete programme to avoid repetition. 1-2 PC members have signed up to each session and  will compile the messages.


'''Focal Point'''  
'''Focal Point'''  
 
*Matthias C. Kettemann, University of Innsbruck, Department of Legal Theory and Future of Law
Focal Points take over the responsibility and lead of the session organisation. They work in close cooperation with the Programme Committee and the EuroDIG Secretariat and are kindly requested to follow [https://www.eurodig.org/get-involved/planning-process/#tab-organising-a-session EuroDIG’s session principles]  
Focal Points take over the responsibility and lead of the session organisation. They work in close cooperation with the Programme Committee and the EuroDIG Secretariat and are kindly requested to follow [https://www.eurodig.org/get-involved/planning-process/#tab-organising-a-session EuroDIG’s session principles]  


Line 38: Line 64:


''List Org Team members here as they sign up.''
''List Org Team members here as they sign up.''
 
*André Melancia, Technical community, Portugal
*David Frautschy, Internet Society
*Alena Muravska, RIPE NCC
*Peter Thomassen, desec.io
*Karen Mulberry, Senior Manager, Public Affairs, IEEE Standards Association (IEEE SA)
*Suncica Rosic, Central European University - Private University
*Barbara Jantzen
*Bruna Santos, WITNESS
The Org Team is a group of people shaping the session. Org Teams are open and every interested individual can become a member by subscribing to the mailing list.
The Org Team is a group of people shaping the session. Org Teams are open and every interested individual can become a member by subscribing to the mailing list.


'''Key Participants'''
'''Key Participants'''


Key Participants are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session not necessarily on stage. Key Participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. They will be selected and assigned by the Org Team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance.  
*On theme 1, success stories, key participant 1, '''Alena Muravska''' [[Alena Muravska EuroDIG 2026|Bio]]
Please provide short CV’s of the Key Participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
*On theme 2, reality check, key participant 2, '''Peter Thomassen''' ([https://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/File:Peter_Thomassen_CV.pdf CV])
 
*On theme 3, key participant 3, '''Suncica Rosic''', ([https://suncica-rosic-cv.tiiny.site/ CV])
 
*On theme 4, key participants 4, '''Karen Mulberry''' and '''Bruna Martins dos Santos'''
 
*The discussion will be moderated by '''Matthias C. Kettemann''', ([https://www.uibk.ac.at/de/zukunftsrecht/team/matthias-c-kettemann/ CV])


== Messages ==   
== Messages ==   

Latest revision as of 11:24, 14 May 2026

27 May 2026 | 14:30 - 15:30 CEST | LORD JENKINS
Consolidated programme 2026

Proposals: #17, #46, #47

You are invited to become a member of the Session Org Team by simply subscribing to the mailing list. By doing so, you agree that your name and affiliation will be published at the relevant session wiki page. Please reply to the email send to you to confirm your subscription.

Kindly note that it may take a while until the Org Team is formed and starts working.

Check the discussion tab and the mailing list archive for information on the development of the session.

Session teaser

Starting from a review of Internet standards, this session examines how open standards can help deliver the Internet we want: resilient, secure, interoperable and inclusive, especially in a time of rapid technological and political change.

As debates on the future of Internet governance continue beyond WSIS+20, one question is becoming increasingly urgent: how do we preserve an open, secure and interoperable Internet while integrating new and more complex technologies?

The Internet’s success has long depended on open standards developed in multistakeholder processes and adopted across networks on a voluntary basis. This model enabled innovation, resilience and global interoperability. But today, the deployment of more complex, automation-dependent and sometimes non-backwards-compatible technologies is putting that model under pressure. At the same time, policymakers are taking a growing interest in standards-setting, while technologies such as AI, quantum computing and other frontier innovations are reshaping the technical and political environment in which the Internet evolves.

Session description

This session asks what we can learn from the Internet’s own history to guide the next phase of technological governance. It looks at the gap between standards development and standards deployment; the economics of adoption, including first-mover disadvantage; and the roles of governments, the technical community, the private sector and civil society in turning open standards into operational reality.

Bringing together technical and non-technical perspectives in the Brussels policy context, the session will explore how multistakeholder cooperation can help align public objectives and technical feasibility - and how standards can remain a practical tool for building the Internet we want.

Format

This workshop will start with inputs from key participants and be structured around four key questions:

(1) Success stories: What lessons from the Internet’s early governance and standards-setting model still matter today?

(2) Reality check: What are the main barriers to legitimate and effective standards-setting and uptake today (technical complexity, deployment challenges, weak incentives, or lack of coordination) and how can they be addressed?

(3) Inclusion and multistakeholder approaches: How can we ensure that all stakeholders are included and that standards are developed fairly and in a spirit of solidarity and inclusion?

(4) Future readiness: How should policymakers, the technical community, and other stakeholders work together on Internet standards in the age of AI, quantum and other frontier technologies, without undermining the Open Internet?

Further reading

Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible. Example for an external link: Main page of EuroDIG

Recommended readings for Theme 1:

Recommended readings for Theme 3:

People

Programme Committee member(s)

  • Milica Vesović, Programme Manager in the Digital Development Unit, Directorate of Security, Integrity and Rule of Law at the Council of Europe
  • Filip Lukáš, Policy Advisor at CENTR
  • Regina Filipová Fuchsová, Industry Relations Manager at EURid

The Programme Committee (PC) supports the programme planning process throughout the year and works closely with the Secretariat. Members of the PC give advice on the topics, cluster the proposals and assist session organisers in their work. They also ensure that session principles are followed and monitor the complete programme to avoid repetition. 1-2 PC members have signed up to each session and will compile the messages.

Focal Point

  • Matthias C. Kettemann, University of Innsbruck, Department of Legal Theory and Future of Law

Focal Points take over the responsibility and lead of the session organisation. They work in close cooperation with the Programme Committee and the EuroDIG Secretariat and are kindly requested to follow EuroDIG’s session principles

Organising Team (Org Team)

List Org Team members here as they sign up.

  • André Melancia, Technical community, Portugal
  • David Frautschy, Internet Society
  • Alena Muravska, RIPE NCC
  • Peter Thomassen, desec.io
  • Karen Mulberry, Senior Manager, Public Affairs, IEEE Standards Association (IEEE SA)
  • Suncica Rosic, Central European University - Private University
  • Barbara Jantzen
  • Bruna Santos, WITNESS

The Org Team is a group of people shaping the session. Org Teams are open and every interested individual can become a member by subscribing to the mailing list.

Key Participants

  • On theme 1, success stories, key participant 1, Alena Muravska Bio
  • On theme 2, reality check, key participant 2, Peter Thomassen (CV)
  • On theme 3, key participant 3, Suncica Rosic, (CV)
  • On theme 4, key participants 4, Karen Mulberry and Bruna Martins dos Santos
  • The discussion will be moderated by Matthias C. Kettemann, (CV)

Messages

The Programme Committee is responsible for taking notes during the session and to formulate 3 (max. 5) bullet points that are presented at the end of each session. The audience shall agree on the messages in (rough) consensus.

Messages should:

  • reflect the discussion in the particular session
  • relate to European Internet governance policy
  • be forward looking and propose goals and activities

Video record

Will be provided here after the event.

Transcript

Will be provided here after the event.