Steering Committee meeting for joint EU / CoE Cybercrime@EAP II and Cybercrime@EAP III projects – Pre 06 2017: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Programme overview 2017 {{Sessionadvice01}} == Session teaser == '''Until 1 April 2017.''' == Keywords == '''Until 1 April 2017.''' They will be used as hash tags for eas..."
 
No edit summary
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Programme overview 2017]]
<big>'''closed meeting'''</big><br />
{{Sessionadvice01}}
5 June 2017 | 15:00 - 17:30 | Room Tartu, Swissotel, Tallinn, Estonia<br />
[[Programme overview 2017|'''Programme overview 2017''']]<br /><br />
 
== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
'''Until 1 April 2017.'''
Review of progress made and way forward for Cybercrime@EAP II and Cybercrime@EAP III projects


== Keywords ==
== Keywords ==
'''Until 1 April 2017.''' They will be used as hash tags for easy searching on the wiki
Cybercrime, projects, EU, CoE, EAP, PGG, Partnership for Good Governance, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, C-PROC, Cybercrime Programme Office, electronic evidence, international cooperation, public/private cooperation


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  
'''Until 30 April 2017.'''
The Steering Committee meeting aims to critically assess the performance against project objectives, identify the major gaps that could be addressed until the end of the project, and re-engage project teams and partners into discussion about the future activities that could take advantage of the expected project achievements.
Always use your own words to describe your session. If you decide to quote the words of an external source, give them the due respect and acknowledgement by specifying the source.
 
* Opening session;
* Progress under Cybercrime@EAP projects;
* Discussion on outputs under Cybercrime@EAP projects;
* Proposal for Cybercrime@EAP projects’ extension in 2018.


== Format ==  
== Format ==  
'''Until 30 April 2017.''' Please try out new interactive formats. EuroDIG is about dialogue not about statements, presentations and speeches. Workshops should not be organised as a small plenary.
Roundtable discussion


== Further reading ==  
== Further reading ==  
'''Until 30 April 2017.''' Links to relevant websites, declarations, books, documents. Please note we cannot offer web space, so only links to external resources are possible.  
* [https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/home CoE Action against cybercrime];
Example for an external link: [http://www.eurodig.org/ Main page of EuroDIG]
* [http://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/cybercrime-office-c-proc- Cybercrime Programme Office of the CoE(C-PROC)];
* [http://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/cybercrime-eap-ii Cybercrime@EAP II];
* [http://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/cybercrime-eap-iii Cybercrime@EAP III]


== People ==  
== People ==  
'''Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.'''
* Representatives of the country teams from Cybercrime@EAP II project team;
*'''Focal Point'''
* Representatives of the country teams from Cybercrime@EAP III project team (2 per country);
Focal Points take over the responsibility and lead of the session organisation. Focal Points are kindly requested to observe [http://www.eurodig.org/get-involved/organising-a-session/#jfmulticontent_c2865-1 EuroDIG's session principles]. Focal Points work in close cooperation with the respective Subject Matter Expert (SME) and the EuroDIG Secretariat.
* PCF project coordinators from each EAP country;
*'''Key Participants (for workshop) or Panellists (for plenary)'''
* Project partners;
'''Until 15 May 2017.''' Key Participants (workshop) are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session – not necessarily on stage. Key Participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. Panellist (plenary) will be selected and assigned by the org team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance. Panellists should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session.
* Representatives from the European Commission and Europol (TBC);
Please provide short CV’s of the Key Participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
* C-PROC management and staff.
*'''Moderator'''
'''Until 15 May 2017.'''
The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers.
Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
*'''Organising Team (Org Team)'''
'''As they sign up''' The Org Team is a group of people shaping the session. Org Teams are open and every interested individual can become a member.
*'''Reporter'''
'''Until 15 May 2017.''' The Reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:
*are summarised on a slide and  presented to the audience at the end of each session
*relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
*are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
*are in (rough) consensus with the audience
*are to be submitted to the secretariat within 48 hours after the session took place
Please provide short CV of the reporter of your session at the Wiki or link to another source and contact the [mailto:office@eurodig.org EuroDIG secretariat] if you need help to find a reporter.


== Current discussion, conference calls, schedules and minutes ==
== Messages ==
See the [[{{TALKPAGENAME}} | discussion]] tab on the upper left side of this page. Please use this page to publish:
 
*dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
By the end of the Planning workshop/Steering Committee meeting, the participants and project partners would have discussed and decided on:
*short summary of calls or email exchange
* Progress by Cybercrime@EAP projects up to date;
Please be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you. Use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize the discussion process.
* Current gaps in project implementation to be addressed until the end of the project – focus on outputs;
* Possible additional activities in light of planned extension of both projects in 2018.


== Messages == 
Please provide a short summary from the outcome of your session. Bullet points are fine.


[[Category:2017]][[Category:Sessions 2017]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Side events 2017]]
[[Category:2017]][[Category:Sessions 2017]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Side events 2017]]

Latest revision as of 17:55, 4 December 2020

closed meeting
5 June 2017 | 15:00 - 17:30 | Room Tartu, Swissotel, Tallinn, Estonia
Programme overview 2017

Session teaser

Review of progress made and way forward for Cybercrime@EAP II and Cybercrime@EAP III projects

Keywords

Cybercrime, projects, EU, CoE, EAP, PGG, Partnership for Good Governance, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, C-PROC, Cybercrime Programme Office, electronic evidence, international cooperation, public/private cooperation

Session description

The Steering Committee meeting aims to critically assess the performance against project objectives, identify the major gaps that could be addressed until the end of the project, and re-engage project teams and partners into discussion about the future activities that could take advantage of the expected project achievements.

  • Opening session;
  • Progress under Cybercrime@EAP projects;
  • Discussion on outputs under Cybercrime@EAP projects;
  • Proposal for Cybercrime@EAP projects’ extension in 2018.

Format

Roundtable discussion

Further reading

People

  • Representatives of the country teams from Cybercrime@EAP II project team;
  • Representatives of the country teams from Cybercrime@EAP III project team (2 per country);
  • PCF project coordinators from each EAP country;
  • Project partners;
  • Representatives from the European Commission and Europol (TBC);
  • C-PROC management and staff.

Messages

By the end of the Planning workshop/Steering Committee meeting, the participants and project partners would have discussed and decided on:

  • Progress by Cybercrime@EAP projects up to date;
  • Current gaps in project implementation to be addressed until the end of the project – focus on outputs;
  • Possible additional activities in light of planned extension of both projects in 2018.
Retrieved from "https://eurodigwiki.org/mw04/index.php?title=Steering_Committee_meeting_for_joint_EU_/_CoE_Cybercrime@EAP_II_and_Cybercrime@EAP_III_projects_–_Pre_06_2017&oldid=17292"