Why the WSIS+20 Review Matters and How National and Regional IGFs Can Enhance Stakeholder Participation – MT 01 2025

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

13 May 2025 | 09:00 - 10:30 CEST | Hemicycle
Consolidated programme 2025

Proposals: #13, #16, #27, #29, #36, #42

Get involved!

You are invited to become a member of the Session Org Team by simply subscribing to the mailing list. By doing so, you agree that your name and affiliation will be published at the relevant session wiki page. Please reply to the email send to you to confirm your subscription.

Kindly note that it may take a while until the Org Team is formed and starts working.

To follow the current discussion on this topic, see the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page.

Session teaser

This year’s 20 year review by the UN General Assembly of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society – the WSIS+20 Review – gets under way in July with the first preparatory meeting of Member States and the WSIS+20 High Level Event hosted by the ITU. EuroDIG will subsequently have the opportunity to submit an input into the WSIS+20 “non-paper”. The EuroDIG messages from its session on WSIS+20 in Vilnius in June 2024 recommended that the review a) should enhance the existing processes of Internet governance, global digital policy and cooperation, and b) renew the IGF's mandate. The aims of the plenary session in Strasbourg are to agree on 1) new consensus-based messages concerning the modalities for stakeholders – assisted by the platforms of the national and regional IGFs – to engage in the WSIS+20 process; and 2) to consider what would be desirable outcomes from the WSIS+20 review.

Session description

As the global community prepares for the WSIS+20 Review, this session can serve as a platform for European stakeholders to align their perspectives on the WSIS objectives and deliver a unified message to the United Nations. The discussion will explore practical ways for non-governmental actors to effectively engage in implementing WSIS commitments, examine how the WSIS objectives align with the Global Digital Compact (GDC), and how National and Regional Initiatives (NRIs) can contribute to both initiatives at their levels. The session seeks to identify concrete actions while maintaining a strong commitment to independent, multi-stakeholder Internet governance.

The Guiding Questions:

  • How can non-governmental stakeholders be effectively engaged in the WSIS+20 Review process in the lead up to the intergovernmental phase?
  • How can NRIs be more involved in the WSIS+20 Review process? How can stakeholder inputs be integrated into national WSIS positions and priorities? What mechanisms would be useful at the country and EU levels?
  • How can alignment between the WSIS+20 Review and other global initiatives and processes, such as the GDC and SDGs 2030 Agenda, be achieved?

Format

We introduce a new format for all Main Sessions. They are NOT panel discussion and conducted as follows:

  • 30 min input (2 x 15' or 3 x 10' VIP / expert presentation)
  • 45 min moderated discussion with the entire audience along a set of guiding questions
  • 15 min agreeing on the messages

Interpretation in English and French.

Further reading

People

Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.

Programme Committee member(s)

  • Mark Carvell, Independent consultant on Internet governance policy
  • Vlad Ivanets, Journalist and media researcher

The Programme Committee supports the programme planning process and works closely with the Secretariat. Members of the committee give advice on the topics, cluster the proposals and assist session organisers in their work. They also ensure that session principles are followed and overlook the complete programme to avoid repetition among sessions.

Focal Point

  • Akriti Bopanna, Global Partners Digital

Focal Points take over the responsibility and lead of the session organisation. They work in close cooperation with the respective member of the Programme Committee and the EuroDIG Secretariat and are kindly requested to follow EuroDIG’s session principles.

Organising Team (Org Team) List Org Team members here as they sign up.

  • Craig Stanley-Adamson, Department for Science, Innovation & Technology, UK Government
  • Alena Muravska, Ripe NCC
  • Nebojša Regoje
  • Mariam Chaladze, ISET
  • Tatiana Tropina, Internet Society
  • Oksana Prykhodko, iNGO European Media Platform
  • Henry Wang, SmartMesh
  • Titti Cassa, AGID | Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale
  • Akriti Bopanna, Global Partners Digital
  • Bruna Martins dos Santos, WITNESS Inc

The Org Team is shaping the session. Org Teams are open, and every interested individual can become a member by subscribing to the mailing list.

Key Participants

Key Participants (also speakers) are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session. Key Participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. They will be selected and assigned by the Org Team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance. Please provide short CV’s of the Key Participants at the Wiki or link to another source.

  • Thibaut Kleiner, Director Future Networks Directorate of DG CONNECT at the European Commission (online)
  • David Souter, ict Development Associates (online)

Moderator

The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event they must attend on-site. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers. Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.

Remote Moderator

Trained remote moderators will be assigned by the EuroDIG secretariat to each session.

Reporter

The members of the Programme Committee report on the session and formulate messages that are agreed with the audience by consensus.

Through a cooperation with the Geneva Internet Platform AI generated session reports and stats will be available after EuroDIG.

Current discussion, conference calls, schedules and minutes

See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page. Please use this page to publish:

  • dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
  • short summary of calls or email exchange

Please be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you. Use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize the discussion process.


Agenda for the First Org Team meeting on March 3:

  1. Introductions of Programme Committee and Org Team members
  2. Summary by Programme Committee members of session’s format, content and objectives
  3. Next steps for the Org Team
  4. Appointment of session Focal Point
  5. Keynote speaker agreement/suggestions
  6. Drafting questions for the 45-min interactive discussion and the 15-min messaging approach agreement
  7. Timeline for agreed actions and scheduling of the next meeting

The summary of the calls and all preparatory details are available via the public link

Messages

  • are summarised on a slide and presented to the audience at the end of each session
  • relate to the session and to European Internet governance policy
  • are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
  • are in (rough) consensus with the audience

Video record

Will be provided here after the event.

Transcript

Will be provided here after the event.

Retrieved from "https://eurodigwiki.org/mw04/index.php?title=Why_the_WSIS%2B20_Review_Matters_and_How_National_and_Regional_IGFs_Can_Enhance_Stakeholder_Participation_–_MT_01_2025&oldid=26848"