PL 04 2019
Consolidated programme 2019 overview
Title: Making norms work – Pursuing effective cybersecurity
Proposals assigned to this session: ID 31, 32, 53 , 59, 74, 95, 106, 174, 202, 206 – list of all proposals as pdf
You are invited to become a member of the session Org Team! By joining an Org Team you agree to that your name and affiliation will be published at the respective wiki page of the session for transparency reasons. Please subscribe to the session mailing list and answer the email that will be send to you requesting your confirmation of subscription.
Cyber norms: Paris call, GCSC Singapore Norm Package, United Nation's GGE and OEWG, and other proposals put forward various suggestions to make cyberspace more stable and secure. How do we unlock their true potential, bridge the gaps between different initiatives and make them work?
The session will discuss in an interactive manner, with the input from both speakers and the audience, the following issues related to cybersecurity norm-making initiatives:
- is there a need for new normative approaches, or do we have enough of existing initiatives?
- should the norms be binding or non-binding? public or private?
- how do we avoid “pulling the blanket” situations, when initiatives compete instead of complement each other?
- in light of various processes, such as UN GGE, Paris Call, etc - how much normative alignment is needed and is this achievable?
- how to bridge the gaps between different norm-making initiatives?
- ultimately, which normative order will lead to stronger cybersecurity - and how to achieve this?
The goal of this session is to achieve as much interactivity as possible for the plenary session format. No lengthy speeches would be allowed: we will focus on interaction and discussion. The session with start with moderators setting the scene and ensuring that both speakers and audience are on the same page concerning the subject, and then will navigate the conversation between speakers and the audience based on the discussion questions outlined in the session description. Moderators will also use interactive tools to collect input from the audience, such a mobile surveys, word cloud and others. Remote participants are welcome and will be given the same voice as on-site participants.
Cyberecurity norms development
Until 15 May 2019.
Please provide name and institution for all people you list here.
- Dimitri Vogelaar, Deputy Head International Cyber Policy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands
Organising Team (Org Team) List them here as they sign up.
- Chivintar Amenty, YouthDIG 2019
- Zoey Barthelemy
- Joost Bunk
- Jacqueline Eggenschwiler, University of Oxford
- Carmen Gonsalves
- Stefania Grottola
- Arianne Janse
- Matthias Kettemann
- Fotjon Kosta, Coordinator of Albania IGF
- Kristina Olausson, ETNO - European Telecommunications Network Operators' Association
- Oksana Prykhodko
- Ilona Stadnik, Saint-Petersburg State University
- Michelle van Min
- Corien van Pinxteren
- Ben Wallis, Microsoft
Key Participants are experts willing to provide their knowledge during a session – not necessarily on stage. Key Participants should contribute to the session planning process and keep statements short and punchy during the session. They will be selected and assigned by the Org Team, ensuring a stakeholder balanced dialogue also considering gender and geographical balance. Please provide short CV’s of the Key Participants involved in your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
The moderator is the facilitator of the session at the event. Moderators are responsible for including the audience and encouraging a lively interaction among all session attendants. Please make sure the moderator takes a neutral role and can balance between all speakers. Please provide short CV of the moderator of your session at the Wiki or link to another source.
Trained remote moderators will be assigned on the spot by the EuroDIG secretariat to each session.
- Andrijana Gavrilovic, Geneva Internet Platform
The Reporter takes notes during the session and formulates 3 (max. 5) bullet points at the end of each session that:
- are summarised on a slide and presented to the audience at the end of each session
- relate to the particular session and to European Internet governance policy
- are forward looking and propose goals and activities that can be initiated after EuroDIG (recommendations)
- are in (rough) consensus with the audience
Current discussion, conference calls, schedules and minutes
See the discussion tab on the upper left side of this page. Please use this page to publish:
- dates for virtual meetings or coordination calls
- short summary of calls or email exchange
Please be as open and transparent as possible in order to allow others to get involved and contact you. Use the wiki not only as the place to publish results but also to summarize the discussion process.
A short summary of the session will be provided by the Reporter.
Will be provided here after the event.
Will be provided here after the event.