Accountability in the Digital Age – Flash 07 2019: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
19 June 2019 | 17:30-18:00  | EVEREST 1 & 2<br />
[[Consolidated programme 2019|'''Consolidated programme 2019 overview''']]<br /><br />
[[Consolidated programme 2019|'''Consolidated programme 2019 overview''']]<br /><br />
{{Sessionadvice-Flash-2019}}
Working title: <big>'''Flash 07'''</big><br /><br />
== Session teaser ==
== Session teaser ==
Digital Identities for citizens are an emerging hot topic in the governance of Internet’s infrastructure and services as it touches many key questions of our digital future.
This session will explore the possible '21st-century instruments' for Accountability in the Digital Age and 'The Hague Charter for Accountability in the Digital Age' as a structured approach for discussion.


== Session description ==  
== Session description ==  
Today the Single Sign-on identities of Google and Facebook dominate the playing field with hundreds of milliones of daily users. But none of these logins are welcome for e-government services where the true and validated identity of the citizen and the protection of personal data matters most.
In this era of the Global Digital Revolution, digital technologies provide the world with a wealth of positive accomplishments. Societies and individuals can benefit in all manner of ways through access to knowledge, people and organizations on a local and global level. More than that, digital has become a must-have, for people, society and the economy. Indeed, digital technology fosters innovation. Online platforms, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, data analytics, robotics and the internet of things (IoT) are further expediting this process by hyper-connecting individuals, organizations, communities, societies and data with tens of billions of objects and entities.


Digital identities touch key questions like security, privacy and openess for the involved parties which are governments, companies and individuals.
Unfortunately, the Internet is not immune to evil. Breaches of norms and values are also occurring in the online and cyber worlds, ranging from fraud, identity theft, bullying and other forms of personal harassment or exploitation through to malign social engineering, phishing and hacking attacks which can threaten key networks and even entire nations. A number of prerequisites have to be met to maintain democratic principles i.e. privacy, security, transparency, safety, wellbeing, and accountability. We need to develop the right instruments for managing accountability in the Digital Age. Instruments can be traditional, such as new international legislation or international government lead institutes. Or, instruments can be more modern '21st-century' such as the creation of an Accountability Index or other digital instruments to measure, track, and/or manage accountability variables.


The issue is to debate which single sign-on digital identities are capable to fulfill todays and future requirements and how should their governance look like. Do we want industry operated closed identities (walled-garden) or community/government managed open identites.
One of the instruments developed is the'The Hague Charter for Accountability in the Digital Age'. This charter aims to provide a structured approach to the discussion allowing participation from a global multi-stakeholder community.
 
As citizens are prepared, willing and waiting for greater security, the digital identity represents a perfect opportunity for public authorities to revitalize the 'sovereign bond' with citizens.


== Format ==  
== Format ==  
After a short intro into the topic by the chair persons the governance of Digital Identities should be discussed with the audience. It sould be called a debate format.
Following a 10 min introduction of the 'The Hague Charter for Accountability in the Digital Age' we will open the floor for suggestions for improvement and refinement and will serve as a public consultation on the Charter.
 
It is expected to have a lively discussion whether Digital Identities should be validated and managed by private entities or by an community/governmental approach.
 
'''Key question are:'''
 
* How much digital sovereignity do citizens need and want?
* Should the public sector take care not only for the official physical identity (passport, ID card) but also for the official digital identity?
* What are the real advantages of the different identity models?
* What's next on this topic?
* tbd


== Further reading ==  
== Further reading ==  
 
Please refer to https://i4ada.org/#charter for a current version of the charter.
'''Links'''
 
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_identity/ Digital Identity by Wikipedia]
* [https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/11/15/demystifying-digital-identity-what-it-is-what-it-isnt-and-what-it-can-be/ Forbes Magazine on Digital Identity]
* [https://www.handelsblatt.com/today/companies/the-virtual-you-german-online-id-startups-ready-to-take-on-us-titans/23583348.html/ ID startups ready to take on us titans]
* [https://www.gemalto.com/govt/identity/digital-identity-trends/ Digital Identity Trends by Gemalto]
* [http://www.id4me.de.org/ ID4me AISBL — Open Federated Global Idenity Protocol website]
* [https://digitale.id/2018/03/19/id-berlin/ ID-Berlin project website]
* ???


== People ==  
== People ==  
Key participants are
* Frits Bussemaker, chair I4ADA
 
* Arthur van der Wees, board member I4ADA
* Dirk Krischenowski (organizer of the session and CEO of dotBERLIN GmbH & Co. KG), krischenowski@dot.berlin
* Maarten Botterman, board member, ICANN
* Jörg Schweiger (CEO of DENIC e.G. and ID4me founding members)
* Jan Kleissen, Director Council of Europe
* tbd
* tbd
 
 


[[Category:2019]][[Category:Sessions 2019]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Flash 2019]]
[[Category:2019]][[Category:Sessions 2019]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Flash 2019]][[Category:Cross cutting/other issues 2019]]

Latest revision as of 12:41, 15 June 2019

19 June 2019 | 17:30-18:00 | EVEREST 1 & 2
Consolidated programme 2019 overview

Session teaser

This session will explore the possible '21st-century instruments' for Accountability in the Digital Age and 'The Hague Charter for Accountability in the Digital Age' as a structured approach for discussion.

Session description

In this era of the Global Digital Revolution, digital technologies provide the world with a wealth of positive accomplishments. Societies and individuals can benefit in all manner of ways through access to knowledge, people and organizations on a local and global level. More than that, digital has become a must-have, for people, society and the economy. Indeed, digital technology fosters innovation. Online platforms, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, data analytics, robotics and the internet of things (IoT) are further expediting this process by hyper-connecting individuals, organizations, communities, societies and data with tens of billions of objects and entities.

Unfortunately, the Internet is not immune to evil. Breaches of norms and values are also occurring in the online and cyber worlds, ranging from fraud, identity theft, bullying and other forms of personal harassment or exploitation through to malign social engineering, phishing and hacking attacks which can threaten key networks and even entire nations. A number of prerequisites have to be met to maintain democratic principles i.e. privacy, security, transparency, safety, wellbeing, and accountability. We need to develop the right instruments for managing accountability in the Digital Age. Instruments can be traditional, such as new international legislation or international government lead institutes. Or, instruments can be more modern '21st-century' such as the creation of an Accountability Index or other digital instruments to measure, track, and/or manage accountability variables.

One of the instruments developed is the'The Hague Charter for Accountability in the Digital Age'. This charter aims to provide a structured approach to the discussion allowing participation from a global multi-stakeholder community.

Format

Following a 10 min introduction of the 'The Hague Charter for Accountability in the Digital Age' we will open the floor for suggestions for improvement and refinement and will serve as a public consultation on the Charter.

Further reading

Please refer to https://i4ada.org/#charter for a current version of the charter.

People

  • Frits Bussemaker, chair I4ADA
  • Arthur van der Wees, board member I4ADA
  • Maarten Botterman, board member, ICANN
  • Jan Kleissen, Director Council of Europe