Right to be forgotten – updates & developments – Flash 10 2018: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
[[Michael J. Oghia]] – Independent consultant | [[Michael J. Oghia]] – Independent consultant | ||
[[Category:2018]][[Category:Sessions 2018]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Flash 2018]] | [[Category:2018]][[Category:Sessions 2018]][[Category:Sessions]][[Category:Flash 2018]][[Category:Media and content 2018]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:17, 25 April 2023
6 June 2018 | 14:00-14:30
Consolidated programme 2018
The so-called "Right to be Forgotten" has moved beyond its European roots to become debated in legislatures around the world. What will the implications be?
Keywords
Right to be Forgotten, Delisting, Right to erasure
Session description
This flash session will cover recent developments within the so-called "Right to be Forgotten" in Europe and around the world, with particular emphasis on a report written for the Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA) titled, "Information Not Found: The “Right to Be Forgotten” as an Emerging Threat to Media Freedom in the Digital Age."
After a brief presentation, the floor will be open for discussion and Q&A.
Format
Since it is a 30-minute flash session, the organizer will present some key developments since last year's EuroDIG session, and then open the floor to discussion.
Further reading
- Information Not Found: The “Right to Be Forgotten” as an Emerging Threat to Media Freedom in the Digital Age
- How ‘right to be forgotten’ puts privacy and free speech on a collision course
- Google Has to Hit Delete After Right to Be Forgotten Turns to Crime
- Google seeks to limit ‘right to be forgotten’ by claiming it’s journalistic
- The “Right to Be Forgotten”: Negotiating Public and Private Ordering in the European Union
- Google’s right to be forgotten – industrial scale misinformation?
- IFLA issues Statement on Right to be Forgotten
People
Michael J. Oghia – Independent consultant