List of proposals for EuroDIG 2021: Difference between revisions

From EuroDIG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 53: Line 53:


|- id="prop_2" class="hu-ri"
|- id="prop_2" class="hu-ri"
| 2 || [[Consolidated_programme_2021#pre01_21 | PRE 1]] || Babatunde Onabajo || ChurchMapped Limited || Private sector || The year 2020 has been marked not only by the COVID-19 pandemic but the George Floyd protests, which began in the United States and spread internationally, including to many countries in Europe. This issue concerns the topic of "algorithmic bias" and how the use of algorithms may put certain marginalised groups at a disadvantage, particularly women and ethnic minorities. In the wake of the George Floyd protests, many companies such as Amazon evaluated how exactly their technologies (e.g. facial recognition) could inadvertently put certain groups at harm. This is also a relevant issue for many companies based in Europe, and the transparency of how some of these algorithms work has been a cause of concern for some leaders, such as Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany. This issue asks questions such as whether self-regulation by companies on algorithmic biases is sufficient, or whether regulation is required, and if regulation is required, in what form?
| 2 || [[Consolidated_programme_2021#ws07_21 | WS 7]] || Babatunde Onabajo || ChurchMapped Limited || Private sector || The year 2020 has been marked not only by the COVID-19 pandemic but the George Floyd protests, which began in the United States and spread internationally, including to many countries in Europe. This issue concerns the topic of "algorithmic bias" and how the use of algorithms may put certain marginalised groups at a disadvantage, particularly women and ethnic minorities. In the wake of the George Floyd protests, many companies such as Amazon evaluated how exactly their technologies (e.g. facial recognition) could inadvertently put certain groups at harm. This is also a relevant issue for many companies based in Europe, and the transparency of how some of these algorithms work has been a cause of concern for some leaders, such as Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany. This issue asks questions such as whether self-regulation by companies on algorithmic biases is sufficient, or whether regulation is required, and if regulation is required, in what form?
|- id="prop_10" class="hu-ri"
|- id="prop_10" class="hu-ri"
| 10 || [[Consolidated_programme_2021#ws03_21 | WS 3]]<br />[[Consolidated_programme_2021#ws04_21 | WS 4]] || Kristin Little || IEEE || Technical community || Issue: Personal Data Sovereignty - Evolving the logic of a physical passport to a digital framework where people can be placed at the center of their data. It is time for the advent of Personal Data Sovereignty -- when the digital environment serves to enhance human interests (of humans and their meaningful groupings). By creating tools for citizens, such as data governance frameworks and machine readable privacy terms for all, society can evolve the logic of a physical passport to a digital framework where people can be placed at the center of their data. Beginning with children to strengthen GDPR and Privacy by Design focused legislation, the creation of such tools allow individuals (or their caregivers) to better understand and influence the collection and use of their (or their children’s) data, as well as access and meaningfully curate and share their data as they choose. While people may still be tracked by advertising or government surveillance oriented tools, Personal Sovereignty provides all humans with their digital voice at an algorithmic level to face the future as empowered and proactive participants in digital democracy.  
| 10 || [[Consolidated_programme_2021#ws03_21 | WS 3]]<br />[[Consolidated_programme_2021#ws04_21 | WS 4]] || Kristin Little || IEEE || Technical community || Issue: Personal Data Sovereignty - Evolving the logic of a physical passport to a digital framework where people can be placed at the center of their data. It is time for the advent of Personal Data Sovereignty -- when the digital environment serves to enhance human interests (of humans and their meaningful groupings). By creating tools for citizens, such as data governance frameworks and machine readable privacy terms for all, society can evolve the logic of a physical passport to a digital framework where people can be placed at the center of their data. Beginning with children to strengthen GDPR and Privacy by Design focused legislation, the creation of such tools allow individuals (or their caregivers) to better understand and influence the collection and use of their (or their children’s) data, as well as access and meaningfully curate and share their data as they choose. While people may still be tracked by advertising or government surveillance oriented tools, Personal Sovereignty provides all humans with their digital voice at an algorithmic level to face the future as empowered and proactive participants in digital democracy.  
Line 145: Line 145:
| 9 || [[Consolidated_programme_2021#pre01_21 | PRE 1]]<br />[[Consolidated_programme_2021#fs02_21 | FS 2]] || Wout de Natris || De Natris Consult || Private sector || The Internet stands in fear of splintering, if it has not done so already. Is this à priori a bad thing for Europe? or could it have advantages as well?
| 9 || [[Consolidated_programme_2021#pre01_21 | PRE 1]]<br />[[Consolidated_programme_2021#fs02_21 | FS 2]] || Wout de Natris || De Natris Consult || Private sector || The Internet stands in fear of splintering, if it has not done so already. Is this à priori a bad thing for Europe? or could it have advantages as well?
|- id="prop_14" class="c-c-o"
|- id="prop_14" class="c-c-o"
| 14 || [[Consolidated_programme_2021#pre01_21 | PRE 1]] || Ross Creelman || ETNO || Private sector || Addressing competition in the digital ecosystem by large digital companies has become a priority for competition authorities not only in Europe but also around the Globe. EU’s forthcoming Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act seek to deal with such issues. Discussion on new trends, proposed frameworks and recent developments will identify a good course of action moving forward.
| 14 || [[Consolidated_programme_2021#ws01_21 | WS 1]] || Ross Creelman || ETNO || Private sector || Addressing competition in the digital ecosystem by large digital companies has become a priority for competition authorities not only in Europe but also around the Globe. EU’s forthcoming Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act seek to deal with such issues. Discussion on new trends, proposed frameworks and recent developments will identify a good course of action moving forward.
|- id="prop_17" class="c-c-o"
|- id="prop_17" class="c-c-o"
| 17 || [[Consolidated_programme_2021#pre10_21 | PRE 10]]<br />[[Consolidated_programme_2021#ws08_21 | WS 8]] || André Melancia || Technical Community || Technical community || Post-Pandemic World: Remote working and all-cloud Internet The pandemic led to changes in the way we work. Remote working has become the norm whenever viable (and it's here to stay). To support remote working, all-cloud services have grew to unprecedented levels in the first half of 2020 (and continue growing to this day), radically changing the Internet, it's players, but also where our data resides, who handles it, and naturally, brings many concerns regarding security, confidentiality, privacy, abuse and digital inclusion.
| 17 || [[Consolidated_programme_2021#pre10_21 | PRE 10]]<br />[[Consolidated_programme_2021#ws08_21 | WS 8]] || André Melancia || Technical Community || Technical community || Post-Pandemic World: Remote working and all-cloud Internet The pandemic led to changes in the way we work. Remote working has become the norm whenever viable (and it's here to stay). To support remote working, all-cloud services have grew to unprecedented levels in the first half of 2020 (and continue growing to this day), radically changing the Internet, it's players, but also where our data resides, who handles it, and naturally, brings many concerns regarding security, confidentiality, privacy, abuse and digital inclusion.

Latest revision as of 14:49, 21 April 2021

During the call for issues for EuroDIG we received 97 submissions in the period from 12 October till 13 December 2020 for the EuroDIG 2021 programme planning. You can find the breakdown here.

Categories are colored as follows:

 Access & literacy   Development of IG ecosystem   Human rights & data protection   Innovation and economic issues   Media & content   Cross cutting / other issues   Security and crime   Technical & operational issues 

You may sort the table by clicking at head of the column. To restore the original sorting, just reload the page.

You can also download the list of proposals as of 13 Feb. 2021 as pdf file.